These years, a beauty test has become popular in South Korea and then in east Asia, which is called color analysis. Color analysis is a method of image management that classifies people into four seasonal types—spring, summer, autumn, and winter. At first, beauty clinic started with physical colorful clothes. They offer clothes of various clothes and make customers wear them. By comparing and analyzing the visual effect that colors combined the skin tone, hair color, and eye color, the customers will get personal style suggestions. For example, individuals with a warm-toned spring type suit bright yellows and oranges, while those with a cool-toned winter type are better suited to highly saturated blues and reds.
Such a color test in offline beauty clinic costs around 100 euro one time. However, with the help of GenAI, we can do it for free. I took a selfie under natural sunlight, without makeup or filter, then used the edit function in my phone to get the RGB value of my hair color, skin color and eye color. After that, I sent those RGB values to ChatGPT and asked it to give me advice following the format of color analysis. Finally I got a detailed report on beauty suggestions like clothes style and makeup style, saying I was the deep autumn type, which turned out to fit me very well.
Another GenAI function I use usually is generating pictures. My part time job is about managing a social media so I need to post many pictures according to the text. I tell ChatGPT to make a poster about a webinar, with captions of its theme, time and location. Unfortunately, in most cases the picture is not what I imagined, even I gave a clear instruction. I usually had to make adjustments for four or five times before getting a just-so-so pic. At first, I guessed the free version was the one to blame and maybe a premium could do better. But after a month of premium version I gave up. The picture generation is just not so satisfying as text analyzing function.
I believe if I give a descriptive instruction following the coding format, the picture it generates could be perfect. But the problem is that I use GenAI tool to save time and energy. If I have to type the programming code for a picture, why don’t I just make a new picture in Photoshop? In my opinion, GenAI tools are already quite smart about analysis and reactions to very clear quantitative orders. More improvements could be done in more abstract and more practical areas, especially under qualitative instructions. For example, when I say “zip up the character’s jacket, keeping the rest of the image unchanged”, don’t generate a picture where the person in it has two right eyes.
