End to End message encryption and privacy/safety concerns

24

October

2016

No ratings yet.

In the beginning of the era of man, people talked with each face to face. A personal way of communicating with each other and private one, unless some else was eavesdropping. The evolution of man generated also new forms of communication between people. First the letter came due to the ability of people to express themselves in letters and words. Right now, the telecommunication and text messages and an important form of communication for us. All these new forms of communication are receptive for privacy and safety issues.
For instance, a phone call can be bugged and text messages between people could also be looked into by intelligence agencies. Basically are these main, new, forms of communication not private anymore since it could be possible that there is someone checking the content of these communications all the time. This might seem as a major drawback but on the other hand could screening these types of communication for societal threats, terrorism, also save lives.
Nevertheless are more and more of these communication channels protected by encryption which makes it harder or sometimes even impossible for external parties to look into these “private” messages. Popular at the moment is the “End to End Encryption” of messages on apps like WhatsApp and Facebook. This encryption means that it is indeed difficult to look into the certain messages for 3rd parties but also for the host of these messages platforms. WhatsApp for instance can’t even see their “own” messages that people sent to each other. Sending a spicy picture on the web “seems” to be more safe now. But are we not giving in on something else at the same time?
Is this increase in our privacy/safety feeling towards messaging, indeed such an improvement of our overall safety for instance? The agencies which are more or less responsible for our safety are facing increasingly difficulties regarding looking into our communication channels. So was it last year the FBI that had a broil with Apple because they could not break into a phone of a terrorist. The same thing goes for our communication channels. So what is more important, a higher feeling of privacy/safety when sending someone a message or the higher feeling of safety for the overall population. This is a very difficult trade-off, especially in times where terrorist attacks are a larger threat to our safety than war with another country. Should intelligence agencies get exemption for looking into our communication channels and devices? For which channels is this more important? Will hackers be the world savers of the future I this wat? Or do we just accept the loss of overall safety in favour of our personal feeling of safety and privacy, in a world where almost all information is already on the world wide web? What do you think?

Please rate this

The internet of things and sustainability

13

October

2016

No ratings yet.

The internet of things, IoT, has been a hype for quite a while now. Unlike many other (technological) hypes, is this one still present right now. Although the internet of things seems to be a technological hype isn’t it really solely about “technology” itself but also about bringing technology together with costumers and businesses. The internet of things could also link internet technology with topics which would not seems to be logical on first sight. One of these interesting combinations is the combination of the IoT with sustainability.

The IoT has a large potential to foster the shift to a more sustainable world. The IoT is able to do real-time analyses of almost any operations or processes within businesses. This is a real tipping point in creating environmental benefits. For instance, linking all traffic data and their greenhouse gas emissions to the air quality in that area, will enable traffic management to directly manage the traffic in such way it will harm the environment the least. Moreover will it change our cities into smart cities with for instance smart public transport, smart lighting and heating systems in buildings. Especially in less developed countries could it enhance the yields from the agricultural sector using smart sustainable crop management systems. This will lead to a decrease of deforestation of the rainforests for example. These efficiency improvements are in essence the core of the internet of things. This is an important link between sustainability and the IoT, since “More from Less” is an essential pillar of sustainability.

Embedding the internet of things even more in our lives will be a costly project. Moreover, are there privacy issues which could impede further growth of the internet of things. Nevertheless has it also great economical perspectives. The IoT will be responsible for 15 trillion of the global GDP in upcoming 20 years, according to Cisco and IBM. This will open countless possibilities for using the internet of things for the good, the shift to a more sustainable world.

Please rate this