How is Facebook changing YOUR Internet?

10

October

2017

4.9/5 (10)

 

The main purpose of the Internet is to freely provide access to data and communication (InternetSociety, 2017). There are different “tools” which enable this, such as Wikipedia or Facebook.
We all know Facebook, a free platform that you can distribute almost everything on it. For most of its users (the users like me and you), the Facebook product is the shared information (could be a product, idea, article etc.) of your network or yourself.

Currently, the platform has over 2 billion users (Zephoria, 2017) and has the goal to offer access globally, to 7.6 billion people, (Worldometers, 2017). But the Internet users are limited (only 3.6 billion people) (Internetlivestats, 2017).
To achieve its goal, Facebook is closing partnerships with telecom firms in developing countries or launching Internet-connected drones into space (Smithson N., 2017). All this will help the company to get more users.

Furthermore, Facebook creates new ways of doing business. For instance, one user in Nigeria wants to sell several jackets but opening a brick and mortar store is too expensive. Thus, he will share the jackets on the platform where potential buyers can see and buy his items. Facebook has a big influence of how some countries run their economies. The platform helps marketers to boost sales, developers monetize applications and most important people in developing countries to take part in “the digital economy” (Fiegerman S., 2015).

What if Facebook will want a part of your business (a percentage of your revenues) or if Nigerian government will put some fees on the Facebook users within its country? Does not this change how the Internet was supposed to work?

Moreover, the Facebook’s influence on people offering their own reality – rewarding users engagements by prioritizing current hot topics- can be a good tool to organize big mass actions (Mike, 2014). For instance, the people can be exposed to some controversial content regarding their religion or country leaders, where big national movements can be planned against these seen topics. But maybe these topics were edited to appear more controversial, manipulating people in the interest of others.

The Facebook goal is to offer access to the whole world but ill-promoted information can have a major impact on all countries in the world.But is someone actually caring about the impact of Facebook on society? Yes, more and more governments try to regulate this online space and what kind of information is getting distributed and by whom (Ingram, 2017). The company tries to eliminate “fake news” as well. But how do you determine if it’s fake news or not? We see the world from different perspectives making really hard to categorize what is true or not.

Is not a paradox that Internet was supposed to give us free access to information across borders without restrictions?
Here is the actual issue with how Facebook shapes our use of the Internet. While in some countries Facebook encourages free-of-speech, in other countries the firm bans some of the subjects tackled by its users introducing us their reality. The Internet became a new reality, which companies such Google, or Facebook own it. Facebook actually operates as a central authority, which tracks what you do, and controls what you share.
Taking all the above points, whose values are we following right now? Is it ours or Facebook’s policies and algorithm values? Is not that Facebook creates markets of how the company wants to see them?

Sources:

Fiegerman S., 2015. Facebook has a big impact on the global economy, says Facebook- funded study.
http://mashable.com/2015/01/20/facebook-impact-global-economy/#N3ftyJhQ0mqz

Ingram M., 2017. Facebook and Google need to be regulated, says British news Industry.
http://fortune.com/2017/03/09/facebook-google-regulated/

Internetlivestats, 2017. Internet users in the world. http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/

InternetSociety, 2017. What is the main purpose of the Internet.
https://www.reference.com/technology/main-purpose-internet-f26f4c9227f6a8a2#

Mike, 2014. Everything you should know about Facebook’s news feed algorithm.

Everything You Need To Know About Facebook’s News Feed Algorithm

Smithson N., 2017, Facebook Inc.’s Vision Statement & Mission Statement. http://panmore.com/facebook-inc-vision-statement-mission-statement

Worldometers, 2017. The current world population.
http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

Zephoria, 2017. The top 20 Valuable Facebook Statistics. https://zephoria.com/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics/

Please rate this

Transparency to NGOs: A real need for a new system?

18

September

2017

No ratings yet.

NGO

 

Working for a global NGO, I was always wondering what drives donors’ trust to share their financial materials with us. Some of the answers consisted in being accountable, quickly respond to their questions and needs as well as making the whole donation process more reliable. But a more critical question that I asked myself was what makes donors lose trust in us or any other NGO around the world? I came up with one essential factor transparency.

Despite the significant efforts of all NGOs or non-for-profit organizations to increase transparency by showing their accountability and responsiveness to all stakeholders, these efforts seem to fail. One reason for this attribution is the actual system.

The actual donation system is made through a third trusted party. For instance, if you want to donate 10 Euros to a community or person, you need to go through a third party, which charges you a small type of fee (transaction fee, project management fee, wages, etc.). Once the third party identifies the person or community that you want to donate your money, your capital will not arrive 100% in their pockets. Instead, part of your donation will be used for internal operations. For instance, the logistic costs cumulate up to 80% of money donated to United Nations for a certain project (Illac Diaz, 2014).

What actually donors need, is a platform where they can efficiently track all their money or contributions without high current fees or considerable efforts.

One great solution coming to offer these advantages is Blockchain.

What Blockchain really does is to immediately transfer the money, with a considerably lower fee, being an immutable, unhackable distributed database. The synchronized distributed open ledger offers the stakeholders’ reliance for their transactions making everything clear for parties, donors and recipients. In a nutshell, this is a platform for truth and it’s a platform for trust (Tapscott D., 2016).

One real-life commercial Blockchain example that is coming to solve transparency to NGOs is AID: Tech. This start-up works with governments and NGOs to provide digital Identity for 2.4 billion undocumented people around the world as well as to make the process of receiving donations more transparent (Abisdris L., 2017). The main idea of the organization is based on the distribution of plastic cards to people offering them a digital identity operating as an account where they can receive donations. They do this through Red Cross: 1 of 17 million volunteers takes a picture of the undocumented individuals (Abisdris L., 2017). This allows Ngo’s donors to transfer their capital for a certain commodity to recipients, easily tracking the money. Moreover, AID: tech went further with the idea. They collaborate with local merchants in order to allow recipients to buy the products they want to with the help of blockchain (Abisdris L., 2017).

For instance, when a refugee receives the AID: Tech card is digitally identified with the help of Red Cross. The donor gives him 10 Euros for the rice. The refugee can order one kilogram of rice online with the money received. Afterwards, the person can go to the shop where his card gets scanned and the shopkeeper can easily identify the person by the photograph in the system and what the refugee is entitled to, offering him the ordered product. What makes this idea more exciting is that the donor receives a text message where he can see how his money got spend, by whom and when.

This idea cannot only reduce fraud but can establish the trust that NGO’s are looking for so badly.

All in all, BlockChain creates new products, changing the nature of relationships between stakeholders. The AID: Tech product not only improves the relationship between the donor and recipients but is changing the NGO’s industry structure. If an efficient implementation of this platform will be made do we still need NGO’s to make the world a better place?

 

Reference

Don Tapscott, 2016. How Blockchain can change the world.
Lanie Abisdris, 2017. Blockchain startup AID:Tech brings more transparency to NGOs and wins $25,000 investment from Jason Calacanis
Illac Diaz, 2014. Lighting Up the World a Liter at a Time
link here – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z02ngSto-sk&t=441s

Please rate this