Technology of the Week – [Group 59] How the Second-hand Market Disrupted Conventional Retailers

13

October

2017

5/5 (1)

Up until the mid-19th century, acquiring exclusive new clothes was only for the rich. The second-hand ‘market’ consisted of the less wealthy passing on their old clothes to each other.

Mass manufacturers later entered the market and made new clothes available to everybody. However, the second-hand market really only gained popularity recently, due to the introduction of electronic markets and auctions. Millennials nowadays represent about one third of the market. Also, the notion that the rich are not interested in second-hand items is outdated. High-income individuals are 35% more likely to shop second-hand than low-income individuals (ThredUp, 2017). The second-hand market is expected to have a worth of $33 Billion by 2021 (Kestenbaum, 2017).

The second-hand market started taking away market share from the mass producers. The modern second-hand market runs on a different business model. Retailers use a linear economy business model: products are 1)produced, 2)used, and 3)disposed of. Second-hand markets are based on circular economy: products are 1) produced, 2) kept and used to extract maximum value, and 3) regenerated, restarting the circle (ThredUp, 2017).

The conventional market felt the rise of the second-hand market in several ways:

  • Exclusivity in high-end fashion. High-end pieces became available to a worldwide audience, for a lower price than when the pieces would be bought in the store. This could result in brand damage for high-end brands.
  • Sales. Customers can sell or buy from other customers directly, inferring that store sales go down and brand image may go down.

United wardrobe is an electronic market and auction for customers to customers in one. They are interesting to customers, as transaction costs are reduced because they do not engage in the actual sale. Electronic markets like Vestiaire collective – selling second-hand designer pieces – have their own team of experts that make sure all the products are authentic. Retailers like Asos already started providing customers their own ‘marketplace’ through their website, possibly as a defense mechanism.

Electronic markets enabled customers to take part in auctions by suppressing auction houses as intermediary. Customers are now able to create their own auctions when selling their products on these online auctions. Oftentimes ‘English Auctions’ are used for this, meaning the bidder that names the highest price gets the products. Such apps and electronic markets are popping out of the ground quickly, each with their own focus and identity (ThredUp, 2017). Another phenomenon that is gaining popularity is the practice of buying high-end designer pieces – for one-time use – and then selling them again, losing little value in the transaction. Or even renting them!

This new trend entails traditional clothing stores losing market share and brand value, since customers do not need to spend a lot of money on designer items anymore. Electronic markets reduce search, communication and information costs, and people do not need to be physically present in stores or acutions.

All in all, the second-hand market is gaining more popularity and conventional retailers must act now or never.
Have your thoughts on second-hand markets changed lately?

 

Sources:
Kestenbaum, R. (2017). Fashion Retailers Need to Adapt to Deal With Second-hand Clothes Sold On-line. Accessed online through: https://www.forbes.com/sites/richardkestenbaum/2017/04/11/fashion-retailers-have-to-adapt-to-deal-with-secondhand-clothes-sold-online/#76907b7f1a7f

Thredup (2017). Annual Resale Report. Annual Resale Report 2017. Accessed online through: https://cf-assets-tup.thredup.com/resale_report/2017/thredUP_resaleReport2017.pdf

Please rate this

How Digitization is Destroying Your Emotions

26

September

2017

No ratings yet.

 

Remember that book you loved reading? How you felt when you opened it and started a new chapter? Or that one professor that used to talk so interestingly you could not not pay attention to him?
When you imagined these things, you probably thought of a physical book and a professor in a physical lecture room, not about an e-book or an online course, right?

Products like books – aside from required lecture books maybe – are usually categorized as hedonic or experiential goods; people purchase them for the pleasure they get from the product (Chen & Granitz, 2010). Also, people tend to attach more emotional value to physical experiential goods than the digitized versions of those products (Waheed, Kaur, Ain & Sanni, 2014). Nowadays  digitized versions of a wide variety of products exist, called digital information goods (Goh & Bockstedt, 2013). To give an example: sure, you can purchase a Beatles album straight from iTunes as a birthday present for your Uncle, but wouldn’t he be so much happier if you would give it to him on vinyl – given your cool uncle has a record player, of course.

Now, the question here is: How can digitized goods provide just as much emotional value (if not more) as physical products?

Note that the question is not whether hedonic products should be digitized at all, because, of course, it is way more efficient to carry around 500 songs on your phone, instead of carrying them around on CD’s. So, when we look at efficiency, digitization is a big help. Also, selling information goods like these can be very beneficial for companies. Creating that first product might be expensive and takes some time, but creating the second version is just a matter of making a copy and, consequently, takes very little time and resources. In other words, marginal costs of information goods are very low, meaning companies can enjoy a big profit marge (Brynjolfsson & Bakos, 1998).  However, wouldn’t it be nice to be able to be just as happy about digitized products as you are about physical ones? If this can be achieved, this could have major effects on companies still producing physical goods that can be digitized, think of DVD’s – which have already lost a huge chunk of market share because of Netflix, HBO, etc. –  postcards and even schools may be at risk somewhere in the unforeseeable future.

Efficiency of digital information goods. Source: https://theecoguide.org/books-vs-ebooks-protect-environment-simple-decision
Efficiency of digital information goods. Source: https://theecoguide.org/books-vs-ebooks-protect-environment-simple-decision

One thing that can be done is to offer more customer value in the case of digitized products. For example, if you purchase that Beatles album – or any other album – through iTunes you get free extra’s such as little video fragments of behind the scenes footage. In this way, consumers get more value for their money, which might increase their happiness.
Although there is no solution to this problem yet, companies selling digitized hedonic/experiential products should try to get consumer happiness to the same level as consumers get from physical products in one way or another.

So, next time you’re thinking of sending someone an e-card, remember that they’ll probably be happier to see one on their doormat.

 

 

Sources

  1. Brynjolfsson, E. & Bakos, Y. (1998). Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits and Efficiency. Management Science, 45(12), 1613 – 1630.
  1. Chen, S. & Granitz, N. (2010). Adoption, rejection, or convergence: Consumer attitudes toward book digitization. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1219 – 1225.
  1. Goh, K. H. & Bockstedt, J. C. (2013). The Framing Effects of Multipart Pricing on Consumer Purchasing Behavior of Customized Information Good Bundles. Information Systems Research, 24(2), 334 – 351.
  1. Waheed, M., Kaur, K., Ain, M. & Sanni, S. A. (2014). Emotional attachment and multidimensional self-efficacy: extension of diffusion theory in the context of eBook reader. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(12), 1147 – 1159.

Please rate this

How AI is Changing the Way You Do Your Groceries

23

September

2017

4/5 (1)

Imagine how much time it would save you if you could just walk into the supermarket, grab the groceries you need, go your own way again. No check-out line, no need for paying on the spot, no packing from your basket into your bag. Sounds too futuristic? Such supermarkets already exist! Amazon introduced the Amazon Go supermarkets, where there are no cashiers and consumers just take the products they need and walk out (Alba, 2016). The consumers are charged through their amazon account after they leave the store (Alba, 2016).

Source: https://www.mobilegeeks.de/news/amazon-go-der-supermarkt-der-zukunft-eroeffnet-2017/
Source: https://www.mobilegeeks.de/news/amazon-go-der-supermarkt-der-zukunft-eroeffnet-2017/

It seems that more and more businesses are moving to a digitally driven environment. If you thought Amazon Go was too futuristic, you will be thunderstruck by Moby, a Japanese 24-hour grocery store with no staff, check-out register, or even fixed location (Peters, 2017). That is right, the grocery store moves itself around and even is designed to visit the warehouse to restock – all by itself (Peters, 2017).

With these technological developments, everyday supermarkets may face serious problems if they do not invest in similar practices. It is too big of a step to implement all the artificial intelligence and machine learning systems Amazon has installed in their Amazon Go shops at once. However, supermarkets are starting to introduce more and more digital driven practices in their environment. An example of a supermarket that started doing so is Albert Heijn, a Dutch supermarket chain that exists for over a century already. They already have a website and mobile application where consumers can, among other things, order products and receive personal discounts, based on their prior buying behavior (Albert Heijn, 2017). They were also the first in The Netherlands to introduce digital shopping lists, meaning consumers can save either spoken or written messages to the list – which has the form of a fridge magnet – or scan barcodes of products, which would then appear on their shopping list in the Albert Heijn App (ESM, 2017).

appie-juni-2017-startscherm-oudnieuw
Albert Heijn App. Source: https://www.iculture.nl/nieuws/vernieuwde-appie-app-albert-heijn-juni-2017/

The above examples are excellent illustrations that artificial intelligence and machine learning are not just fancy technologies used in fancy businesses. They also illustrate that if everyday grocery stores choose to complete disregard these developments, they might end up in big trouble. The ‘new way of grocery shopping’ is much more efficient and time-saving.

No worries – unless you really enjoy spending time in the grocery store, then do worry – better times are coming. Maybe in a few years we will be visited by the grocery stores themselves, instead of the other way around. What do you think?

 

 

 

Sources:

ESM (2017). Albert Heijn Trials Hiku Smart Shopping Gadget. Accessed online through: https://www.esmmagazine.com/albert-heijn-trials-smart-shopping-list-gadget-hiku/41736

Alba, D. (2016). Only Amazon Could Make a Checkout-Free Grocery Store a Reality. Accessed online through: https://www.wired.com/2016/12/amazon-go-grocery-store/

Albert Heijn (2017). Appie App: Alles over de vernieuwede Appie App. Accessed online through: https://www.ah.nl/appie-app

Peters, A. (2017). The Grocery Store Of The Future Is Mobile, Self-Driving, and Run By AI. Accessed online through: https://www.fastcompany.com/40429419/this-tiny-grocery-store-is-mobile-self-driving-and-run-by-ai.

Please rate this