The slow death of qualitative media

9

October

2016

5/5 (1)

Growing up with a television on which your favourite show aired at a certain time on a certain day has always been the way we experienced the media. The newspaper that was delivered every morning and the billboards by the side of the road as you went to work. By the introduction of the digital media things have been changing and habits are going to change even further according to Mckinsey. But what will happen to the quality of the media and how is the revenue stream going to change?

The traditional media had a business model in which the ad revenue was their biggest income. This explains both the newspapers, in which ads were displayed at the side of the pages and sometimes covered entire pages, and the television stations, which showed ads in the middle of their shows and between two shows. The income was steady and the companies could ask a price for their ad space depending on the popularity of the show or news article. Also billboard sign have generated a steady income depending on the amount of traffic on the road.

The digital innovation has disturbed this market with a new platform on which the revenue was generated in a different way. By 2019 the global add revenue of the television industry will rise with 5%, the newspaper industry with -0.6%, the billboards with 3.1% and the digital industry with12.7%. (Desjardins, J., 2016) Newspapers are being attacked by for example the Dutch firm Blendle, which offers a pay-per-article instead of the traditional subscription to the entire newspaper. The television is being pushed out of the market by the rise of both Youtube content as well as big movie providers such as Netflix. The quality of the media is however not unharmed.

Blendle for example only shows a small part of the article to make you decide whether or not you want to buy it. The tendency for authors to make the title and the small abstract as sensational and popular as possible might cause a failure to actually bring quality content. The traditional media could have both sensational and quality content due to the subscription based revenue. If only the sensational news will be sold the quality will suffer. The same principal applies to the television industry. The quality talk shows will be replaced by the sensational shows that are meant to entertain people instead of inform them, because this will generate more views.

Do you share this opinion on the slow death of the qualitative media and the rise of more sensation seeking media?

Sources:

Chart: The Slow Death of Traditional Media

Please rate this

Adblock Plus will start selling ads

14

September

2016

5/5 (6)

The days of ads in the banner and pop-up displays seemed to be part of the past for internet users, but it might see its return soon. The company Adblock Plus offered an add-on for internet browsers blocking the ads shown on web pages. This free service was thought to be a generous community anticipated action with great benefits for users and great downsides for companies. Recently though, the company has announced it will be selling whitelisted space in the application for companies who want their ads to still be shown.

Companies have struggled for years trying to get around the Adblock users. The revenue of most websites were fully reliant on the ads shown on the page. Companies such as Hulu, Bloomberg and others have tried to get around Adblock by detecting the application and blocking all the content of the website for users who do not turn the application off or whitelist the website in the application. To show the damage Adblock Plus does to companies PageFair has an online paid service to show how much companies suffer by Adblock Plus. For instance, in the year 2012 Google had a total $887 million loss in revenue due to the blocking service. The total amount of revenue generated by the Google ads was however $50 billion (businessinsider.com, 2013). Studies of PageFair and Adobe in 2015 showed that the average user who blocks ads in the USA is about 16%, in the UK 21% and in Europe up to 25% in some countries (arstechnica.com, 2016).

Recent developments however might save companies from their ads not being displayed for every user. Adblock Plus is using their power to give companies the opportunity to show their ads by paying for a whitelisted spot in the application. Adblock Plus is however not the only ad-blocking company and therefore their power is more limited. This development seems like an interesting combination of both IT, innovation and strategy in a modern start-up. Do you think the strategy of Adblock Plus will be effective or do you think competitors will be taking over the ad-blocking industry?
 

Sources:

http://www.businessinsider.com/google-saved-an-estimated-887-million-by-paying-adblock-plus-to-show-its-ads-2013-8?IR=T

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/09/adblock-plus-starts-selling-ads-but-only-acceptable-ones/

Please rate this