Digital Transformation Project – Langejan

22

October

2016

No ratings yet.

Langejan is a real estate agency which is established in Kralingen, Rotterdam. In 1867 the company began with buying and selling houses and is nowadays one of the oldest brokerages in the Netherlands. The working area is Rotterdam and they are committed to small and big apartments; family houses; luxury mansions and villas.

 

For a long time, the real estate market was a highly localized market where people were mostly looking for a house close to work or where they were living. Also the real estate agents had mostly houses or apartments that were close by. But new technologies have created new possibilities.

 

In order to gain a sustainable competitive advantage, virtual technology can be an interesting opportunity. Virtual reality is immersive multimedia that digitally simulates physical presence in real or imagined worlds, and let the user interact with that world.

 

IT plays a big role at Langejan. They believe that they’re way ahead of competition in this area. They already use VR goggles for the showing of houses that still have to be built sometimes, but not for houses that already exist. Based on the theory and the conducted survey, it is recommended that the sightings of houses that already exist are also available for VR goggles.

 

The first motive to introduce the VR technology is that it reduces the time that it requires to do a house sighting. This allows customers to see more houses in less time. Something that could be a great benefit for potential clients that have a busy time schedule. A second motive for VR technology is that a frequently made comment about real estate agents is that it takes a long time to make an appointment with an agent. With the use of VR technology, agents are able to digitally send a virtual tour to clients so that they have already seen some houses before the first meeting. The last argument for the use of VR technology is that agents are able to show clients possible renovations or adjustments on the house.

 

When looking at technical feasibility the steps that need to be taken are not very rigorous. When the IT structure is adjusted for this software and the website is capable of playing the videos the company will be able to benefit from the technology. And financially we expect the investment could save them up to 38265,80 euros.

 

In summary we think that the ability of doing house sightings at the office or at home can be seen as an extend of their current business. It is still providing house sightings, but making use of the current development within technology, virtual reality. The transition fits well in the current business, so no drastic changes are needed. The major challenges for Langejan are obtaining the skills for capturing and creating virtual technology content and securing the availability of the content.

Please rate this

Google Home vs. Amazon Echo

10

October

2016

No ratings yet.

Last week in San Fransisco Google introduced their new Google Home. The product will be available for pre-order on Tuesday and on November 4 they will be in stores, the device costs 129 dollars.

 

Google Home is a wi-fi speaker which also works as a smartphone control centre and an assistant, it’s controlled by voice commands. You can use Home to play music, get answers to easily-answered questions, set timers and control smart lighting fixtures. It’s similar to the Amazon Echo which was released in 2015.

 

When Google saw the Amazon Echo being so succesful (over 3 million sold) they must’ve seen it as a great threat. Being able to quickly answer questions has been Google’s bread and butter for years. So it’s pretty obvious for Google to compete with Amazon is this market. Google also has a lot of services like Calender and Maps for example which are connected to the Home, and count as a big advantage for Google.

 

There are some differences between the Home and the Echo. First of all the Home recognizes follow-up questions. For example when you ask Home “who is Nicolas Cage?” you can follow it up by asking “What movies has he been in?” and get a response, you can’t ask Echo this question. The Google Home can also share information with your smartphone and other Google devices like the chromecast.

 

Do I believe Google will immediatly surpass Amazon in the smart speaker market? No. Amazon has a pretty big headstart and they currently have 400 open positions at their Echo department which indicates that they’re still doing pretty well. But I do believe that Google has the ability to be a big player in this market. As I mentioned earlier, answering questions quickly has been their bread and butter and they’ve got a lot of services which make the Home very usable.

 

http://www.pcmag.com/article/348496/google-home-vs-amazon-echo-which-one-should-rule-your-smar

 

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexkantrowitz/google-home-will-put-google-everywhere-when-it-debuts-next-m?utm_term=.kmeYa9E17Y#.ps3WXzB9nW

 

http://variety.com/2016/digital/news/google-home-introduction-1201877695/

Please rate this

Self-driving car, how far along are we?

4

October

2016

No ratings yet.

Almost every car manufacturer is developing a self-driving car, even some technology companies are doing it. So you have to figure we’re pretty close to actually being able to buy self-driving cars right? We might be, but we keep reading about self-driving cars being involved in car accidents, like google’s car last month, or Tesla’s car in China which lead to the death of a 23 year old passenger. Even though both companies claim it’s not the fault of their cars, you can imagine people are getting hesitant toward buying into the self-driving car hype.

So how safe is a self-driving car? The reality is that we don’t know, and we might never know according to RAND corporation. They brought out a report which states that autonomous vehicles would have to drive hundreds of millions of miles to gain enough information to compare them with human driven cars. This would take tens of years at minimum, which makes it highly impractical. Google says that of the 12 accidents that did occur until april 12th 2016, all of them were caused by humans. But their drivers also prevented self-driving cars from causing an accident 13 times, by which we can conclude it isn’t safe yet.

How close are we to self-driving cars? Some car companies have already released self-driving features that gives the car some ability to drive itself. Volvo said that they will start selling self-driving cars in 2021. But we’re not there yet, President Obama recently said that the government must ensure consumers safety without hampering the industry with too much regulation. For self-driving cars to be available among regular consumers regulations need to be clarified.

I think we are pretty close to driving self-driving cars, I believe they seem a lot less safe than regular cars because everytime an accident happens it’s in the news. They might even be safer than human driven cars, I don’t know because not every car accident is newsworthy. What I do know is that I’d rather drive a car myself than be driven by one, I trust myself more than technology I guess.

 

sources:

http://www.nu.nl/gadgets/4324241/tesla-aangeklaagd-in-china-dodelijk-ongeluk.html

 

http://www.nu.nl/gadgets/4326770/zelfrijdende-auto-google-betrokken-bij-verkeersongeluk.html

 

http://fortune.com/2016/04/12/self-driving-cars-safety-study/

 

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/180256/20161002/volvo-to-start-selling-self-driving-cars-in-5-years-silicon-valley-research-center-ready-to-start-work.htm

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-self-driving-cars-2016-9

 

Please rate this