Quantum Teleportation

13

October

2017

5/5 (4)

Teleportation. A subject if discussed 20 years ago people would say you were mad if you believed in it. Now, in 2017, its a broadly discussed subject by many scientists, of which the possibilities are becoming endless. Sure, it may not be the instantaneous Stargate style teleportation device that you had in mind, but it’s incredibly powerful in its own right. Personally, I think we’ve barely begun to understand the full extent of its ramifications.

Quantum Teleportation is just a recent idea on the timescale of breakthroughs in physics. The idea was first discovered in 1993 by a team from IBM and then experimentally verified in 1997 (quantumfrontiers, 2012). Still, on this day, many people do not believe in the possibilities quantum teleportation has to offer. Imagine being told about the internet in 1948 and trying to understand how useful it can be. In my opinion, it’s kind of the same. Any semblance of a quantum internet will intimately rely upon the same teleportation.

Two experiments have been conducted and performed with very positive results regarding quantum teleportation. The first was performed in Qinghai Lake in Western China which resulted in performing an actual teleportation of an entangled photon pair. An entangles photon pair is best described as particles (which float in the air) who are entangled with each other but are separated by great distances. the phenomenon so riled Albert Einstein he called it “spooky action at a distance.”  Entanglement occurs when a pair of particles, such as photons, interact physically (Lifescience, 2013).

The second achievement is of the same nature of the one above, but than rather mind-blowing. In the Canary Islands they managed to teleport qubits (a unit of quantum information, like a computer-bit) with a distance of 143 km, between the islands of La Palma and Tenerife (quantumfrontiers, 2012).

Now let’s see what Quantum Teleportation (QT) has achieved (so far) and also, let’s clear out what it can not do.

The three most important achievements of QT are:

  • QT enables to move unknown quantum states throughout the universe;
  • QT can provide uninterrupted internet, by making ‘reservoirs’ of internet (always being able to be online);
  • QT enables to send quantum states to unknown locations. The unknown location however can relocate the place on which the ‘message’ was sent.

However, there are some things that QT does not allow (yet):

  • QT does not enable faster than light communication;
  • QT can not clone quantum states. Too bad boys, no cloning pickachu’s (just yet).

 

In the article ”How has Electronic markets …. newly vulnerable markets” by Granados et al, it is discussed how the internet and its new digital intermediaries threaten the viability of the existing global distribution systems (GDSs).  They examine the transformation of e-travel distribution to test how the travel markets become vulnerable to fundamental changes triggered by IT. Well, I think its fair to say that the findings of quantum teleportation definitely disrupts the old and current (e-)travel markets and will disrupt more than just the travel industry.

After having seen all the possibilities that lay with Quantum Teleportation, I am very curious to see what your opinion is regarding the subject. We are now still at a phase on which the only thing that can be teleported are just some quantum statuses (some particals) but lets be honest: in, say, 50 years.. Don’t you think we will be able to teleport real life items? Or maybe even humans?

 

By Pieter Spigt

 

References:

How to build a teleportation machine: Teleportation protocol

https://www.livescience.com/28550-how-quantum-entanglement-works-infographic.html

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250204

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please rate this

Orcam Myeye: Giving sight to the blind

28

September

2017

No ratings yet.

I want to share with you the innovative product that Orcam has made possible. It is, as stated on their website, the world’s most advanced wearable artificial vision device and it is truly life changing. The Orcam Myeye makes the blind see again. And that is no exaggeration.

The Myeye is an artificial, portable device that is mounted on the frames of a pair of eyeglasses, which instantly tells you what it sees. The user only needs to point at what they want to read and the device automatically makes a picture, processes the pictures and reads out loud what the picture states. Activated by a simple gesture as pointing your finger (or pressing a button on the device), the Myeye makes newspapers, books, computers, smartphone screens, restaurant menus, labels on supermarket products, street signs accessible – in real time (Orcam, 2017).  The device can even recognize friend’s faces. If you look at a friend, click the button and pronounce their name, the Myeye saves the face with that name and every time you meet your friend but you can’t (properly) see him/her, the device reads out their name for you.

That all being said, it is clear to say that the Orcam Myeye is an innovative product that can be seen as a breakthrough for the medical and healthcare industry. However, the Myeye is not the first in its market. There are only a few head-mounted wearable devices which offers visually impaired users discreet and hands-free access to digital information to augment their awareness of and facilitating their interaction with their environment. For instance, take the Google Glass. The difference with the other artificial vision devices, like the Google Glass, is that those existing devices were merely innovative products made for the (full)able-bodied consumers. These are mainly just practical gadgets in order to make life more practical/fun, but the Myeye is really just there to act as a personal aiding assistant for the visually impaired.  That difference makes the Myeye operate in the healthcare industry and the other existing vision devices operate in the lifestyle consumer market (Goeppert and Manoli, 2004).

With that being clear, the next question pops my mind. Should the Orcam Myeye be covered by your health insurance? Currently, in the Netherlands, it is not and it makes my wonder why (nu.nl). Sure, the device is pretty expensive, to wit between the  €3000,- and €4000,- (orcam.nl). But think about it: it is not only from a ethical perspective to include the vision device in the healthcare system, seeing that it actually changes people’s life, but the Myeye is also actually really beneficial for the government expenses. Because the costs of visually impaired persons for the government to the insurance companies is very high because they need somebody to assist them. But with the vision device it makes people independent. Meaning that they can go back to work, read their texts, buy their own groceries and much more, by having a device in stead op actual people assisting them, which creates great governmental costs reductions.

Concluding that the Orcam Myeye is an innovative product operating in the healthcare industry, digitizing the market by taking over the jobs of assisting the visually impaired. Seeing that the Myeye innovates the current healthcare industry, one could say it is a disruptive technology. I just say that the Orcam Myeye makes the world a better place. What’s your opinion?

 

By Pieter Spigt

References:
https://www.nu.nl/155162/video/video-met-deze-bril-kunnen-blinden-lezen.html

MyEye

Danneels, E. (2004), Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21: 246–258. doi:10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00076.x

Jacob Goeppert, Yiannos Manoli, “Fully Integrated Startup at 70 mV of Boost Converters for Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting”, Solid-State Circuits IEEE Journal of, vol. 51, pp. 1716-1726, 2016, ISSN 0018-9200

 

 

 

Please rate this