It is a hot topic in America: DNA software FST. This tool is used in one of the major crime labs of New York. The software is able to analyze two or more mixed DNA styles. These complex computer algorithms are able to distinguish different DNA. But critics recently raised some questions about the reliability of the software. They said that the code is flawed and not useable. There might even be people in jail who are not supposed to be there due to errors in the system. (nu.nl, 2017)
Some criminal defense experts do agree with the opinion that this system might have some flaws and they demanded transparency. This is a clear example of lack of transparency from FST, as it was not an open software and they did not share any details with the community of how the coding works. In 2016, the code was transferred to some experts and lawyers for use of the defense in a case, but still not public accessible (Coldewey, 2016).
As this can be a hot topic, my point of view is that these life changing software tools should have more openness to begin with. Although it might be dangerous to share the code with the public, the benefits can be huge as the public can help you develop a better system with their contribution. Arguments against this might be that hackers or smart criminals can use this code to their advantage and manipulate the software. This might lead to them hacking the system and manipulating the DNA match. On the contrary, crowds have knowledge. So making the code public available can offer you great benefits. What do you think? Do the benefits outweigh the downsides? Should such an important code be public and shared all around the world?
As I have never heard of the software, it is very interesting to take a look at the code. It can be found here at GitHub. So, if you are interested in building your own DNA software you might be able to transfer this code to your own computer ? https://github.com/propublica/nyc-dna-software
Other sources:
Nu.nl (2017) rechter VS maakt broncode DNA-software openbaar in belang van rechtzaak. Retrieved 22 October from https://www.nu.nl/internet/4973984/rechter-vs-maakt-broncode-dna-software-openbaar-in-belang-van-rechtszaak.html
Coldewey, D. (2016) Disputed DNA analysis software’s code open for inspection after court order. Retrieved 22 October from https://techcrunch.com/2017/10/20/disputed-dna-analysis-softwares-code-open-for-inspection-after-court-order/