What do bitcoin and Azerbaijan have in common?

17

October

2017

No ratings yet.

If you have never heard of the blockchain technology, you probably have lived under a stone for a little while. Investors are throwing millions at cryptocurrencies, companies are heavily seeking blockchain applicable business cases and even the average man is able to make a fortune trading cryptocurrencies, overnight. But does blockchain only lead to winners? Or may there also be any downsides related to the blockchain technology? In this blog I would like to share an interesting article that touches upon one of the downsides of blockchain enabled cryptocurrencies.

The following article (https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption) reflects on an index that measures the amount of energy used by computers maintaining the bitcoin network: the Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index. On average, every 10 minutes ‘miners’ add new sets of transactions to the Bitcoin ledger. These transactions are being authorized by the cryptographic code and require computers to process them.

What turns out is that Bitcoin currently uses about the same amount of electricity as the entire country of Azerbaijan. Compared to another payment method, Visa, Bitcoin uses more than 40 times the energy that Visa uses in order to handle its transactions. Thereby, with 82.3 billion transactions per year, Visa handles a lot more transactions than bitcoin does. Bitcoin is not the only extensive energy consuming cryptocurrency. A same index is available to measure the energy consumption of Ethereum: the Ethereum Energy Consumption Index. This index shows that Ethereum uses more units of electricity than countries like Cyprus and Combodia. This, in my opinion, makes blockchain enabled cryptocurrencies not a very sustainable method of handling transactions.

If you are interested in this topic, the article ends by sharing some related articles reflecting on the energy consumption of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Please feel free to share your thoughts on this topic and the particular article below.

References:

Please rate this

Disrupt or be disrupted

2

October

2017

No ratings yet.

‘The collaborative economy is growing rapidly. Gross revenue in the European Union from
collaborative platforms and providers was estimated to be 28 billion Euros in 2015. Growth in recent
years has been spectacular with revenues almost doubling from 2014 to 2015.’

This quote from the communication on the collaborative economy by the commission demonstrates
the growing importance of a new form of business called the collaborative or sharing economy.
Uber is one of the prime examples of companies operating through the sharing economy. According to the commission staff working document that accompanies the communication Uber is one of the largest companies in the sharing economy of the EU.

So what is Uber and what is the sharing economy that they participate in? Uber describes itself on twitter and their website as a ‘way to evolve the world by seamlessly connecting riders to drivers through their app.’ Uber is an online platform that everybody can use which connects consumers to other consumers. On one side they provide a way to get a ride for consumers on the other side they provide an opportunity for other consumers to offer rides in their own cars. This is also the essence of the sharing economy, companies that provide a platform for consumers to connect with each other and provide services. Uber started out as an app to request rides in 2008 and has spread to hundreds of cities throughout the world, expanding its service portfolio (UberEATS e.g.).

This huge growth has lead to an enormous amount of resistance both on the ground, where
Uber offers its services, and on a political level. As it is with all things new, people are afraid of
change initially, this is true for Uber and the whole of the sharing economy as well. On the ground
level Uber has faced enormous difficulties with traditional taxi companies that feel threatened by this new competition. In multiple big European cities this has led to witch hunting and violence by taxi drivers against Uber drivers. 4 But it is not just on the ground level where Uber has run in to trouble, individual EU member states have also tried blocking Uber from operating. For instance in Spain where Uber was banned by the court and forced to stop all activities.

These unrests are a reaction to the feeling that Uber provides unfair competition to the more traditional companies. But what turns out is that legislation and frameworks in general have proven to be insufficient in protecting old-fashioned companies in the sharing economy era. Fortunately, because they shouldn’t. Disruption is nothing new. What’s new is that with the current information technology, disruption can happen faster than ever. Old-fashioned companies should not hope for regulators to protect their market share; disrupt or be disrupted would be my advice.

Sources
• European Commission, ‘The Collaborative Economy’, http://tinyurl.com/hfhrnfl (2-6- 2016)
• European Commission, ‘European agenda for the collaborative economy – supporting analysis’, (Brussels 2-6-2016) 9.
• Uber, https://twitter.com/Uber.
• L. Westcott, ‘The Fight Against Uber Gets Violent in France’, in: newsweek, http://tinyurl.com/h62l2my (25-6- 2015).
• BBC, ‘Uber taxi app suspended in Spain’, http://www.bbc.com/news/business-30395093(9-12- 2014).

Please rate this