The Streaming Wars: when streaming services become a more expensive cable

20

September

2019

Netflix is more than just an online digital platform; it has become a cultural phenomenon. Three years ago, Netflix became this one channel to watch virtually anything: from Jurassic Park to Breaking Bad to Toy Story. Many people take their first-month-free subscription because they don’t want to miss out on the latest season of Stranger Things, and never left since. It introduced a trend of binge-watching shows, finishing hours of series in one go until the screen blacks out and asks “Are you still watching?” Television became a device that streams Netflix instead of being its own thing. It lost its meaning so much that many people become cord-cutters – ditching their expensive cable TV subscriptions for a mere $9.99 per month Netflix accounts. It seems that the development of internet goods has yet again made life much cheaper and simpler.

 

Or so we think.

 

Direct-to-consumer distribution model

As Netflix’s popularity and valuation grow, linear (traditional) TV suffer. It is not long when media companies such as WarnerMedia, NBC Universal, and Disney start to launch their own streaming platforms, too. These networks apply a direct-to-consumer distribution model (Sherman & Evans, 2019); instead of selling the licensing rights of their shows to Netflix, they use their brands to make their own platform. These so-called streaming wars prompt TV networks to spend millions of dollars to buy the rights to their most popular shows – such as The Office, Friends, and every Disney movie – back from Netflix to be streamed in their own online platforms NBC’s streamer, HBO Max, and Disney+, respectively (Steinberg, 2019).

Just like most industries, giant tech companies also plans to infiltrate the entertainment industry. Following Netflix’s path of bringing more on-demand consumer base by introducing original content, Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV+ are also in the game with their exclusive contents. For streaming services, the ability to deliver quality content for their platforms is crucial. Take Disney+ as an example: people most probably already have the physical form of their movies, so they need to add value to this new channel (Horner, 2019).

 

Pricing plans

Netflix’s current monthly subscription fee of $9-16 is one of the highest among competitors, Amazon Prime Video ($13), and Hulu ($6-12). However, newcomers’ subscription prices are way lower; with Disney+’s $7 per month and Apple TV+’s mere $5 per month, these prices will definitely damage Netflix’s subscriber count. Other platforms also continue to respond by cutting their subscription prices, like NBCU’s free for cable or satellite subscribers ($12 for non-subscribers). Rao et al. (2000) mentioned that cutting prices may not always be a good retaliation move on their parts as it reduces the overall pie of the market. The other route that each player can take to win is to maximise their platform’s value. Disney, with its extensive collection of movies and series, definitely has the upper hand on this matter. Everything Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars, National Geographic, 21st Century Fox will be on its platform, which will launch in November this year. Not only that, Disney+ also has a subscription bundling plan with other streaming platforms Hulu and ESPN+; both of which are owned by Disney Corporation as well.

Streaming platforms are, in general, a great innovation because it decouples watching TV and watching advertisements (Texeira & Jamieson, 2014). Nonetheless, it seems that the losing party in this war are the consumers. Taking all the pricing plans mentioned above (plus HBO Max’s rumoured subscription price of $16-20 per month), subscribing to all of these platforms would cost – if not more – the same as cable TV subscriptions. The only difference is that giant tech companies have now also entered the battlefield.

Although we have more choice in what to purchase, more options often mean that we might (reluctantly) spend more money than we should have. “Unbundling” Netflix would only create a fragmented market, which will generally increase prices for content (Steinberg, 2019), and induces the need to – yet again – have a platform that bundles everything together again. So, how many loops will it take before the system breaks?

 

References

Horner, A. (2019, July 3). Streaming wars: Why Disney and Apple rivalling Netflix is good news for fans of great TV. Retrieved September 17, 2019, from Independent: https://www.independent.co.uk/

Rao, A., Bergen, M., & Davis, S. (2000). How to Fight a Price War. Harvard Business Review, pp. 107-116.

Sherman, A., & Evans, D. (2019, August 10). How the streaming wars between Disney, Netflix, Apple and everybody else will change TV forever. Retrieved September 17, 2019, from CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/

Steinberg, B. (2019, July 18). Why Consumers Are Already Losing in the Streaming Wars. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from Variety: https://variety.com/

Teixeira, T., & Jamieson, P. (2014, October 28). Disruption Starts with Unhappy Customers, Not Technology. Harvard Business Review.

5/5 (1)

Please rate this

IKEA: the future of smart homes?

10

September

2019

The Internet of Things (IoT) is one of the disruptive developments of technology that has been prominently infiltrating homes, businesses, and cities. With the emergence of Alexa and Google Assistant, many companies have followed suit. One of the relatively new players in this game is IKEA, the Swedish company known for its functional and affordable home furnishing. Initially developed as a project in 2012, the company first dove in by introducing wireless chargers and smart LED lights.

 

IKEA Home smart

The collection of their items, labelled ‘IKEA Home smart’, started with the smart lighting ecosystem Trådfri (translates to wireless from Swedish), a cheaper alternative to Philips’ Hue. Cheap wireless chargers soon followed to compete with those of giant tech companies such as Apple and Samsung. In addition, IKEA also partnered with the speaker company Sonos to jointly introduce their €99 smart speaker Sympfonisk.

What is attractive about these line of products, aside from the low price, is the compatibility with Apple HomeKit, Alexa, and Google Assistant – an existing AI technology with a growing customer base. At the end of 2019, IKEA will launch yet another tech-induced furniture: smart blinds. All of these smart products are also controllable through IKEA Home smart app, similar to the likes of other incumbents. The company does not show signs of stopping as it has just significantly increased its investment for smart technology by introducing a new business unit.

 

A ‘smart’ business move

Björn Block, Head of the new IKEA Home smart Business Unit at IKEA of Sweden, exclaimed that the company would focus on “improving and transforming existing businesses and developing new businesses.” IKEA successful cost leadership business strategy extends to these smart product line as well, apparent with the success of Trådfri LEDs against Philips’ Hue, the first mover of smart lighting. It also seems that the company’s upcoming smart blinds, with a €99-129 price range, will also become the cheapest among the current €300-400 smart blinds available in the market.

IKEA’s years of experience in the furniture and appliance sector gives them a massive platform of specific product approach and gigantic distribution network. Most of the incumbents of smart home AI developers and device designers – Amazon, Apple, Google, and Samsung, among others – may have these platform as well. Still, they lack a massive retail presence, while IKEA has hundreds of physical stores that double as warehouses around the globe.

 

5d5bef10cd978471a167f0b6-750.jpg

 

Perhaps the determining factor of IKEA’s likely success in the smart home battle is its integration of the fragmented smart home ecosystem to a single, IKEA standard as it has access to all home products. Whereas many developers of smart home devices, such as Samsung and Nest, are only experts in specific – and limited array – of products. If this business unit continues to introduce smart technology furniture, it has a strong chance of becoming the leader in the industry and may promote the rise of IoT into everyday lives.

While the security risks of cheap IoT products is still a question mark, there is no doubt that the introduction of smart products enhance the value of IKEA’s products to customers and magnifies the company’s vision of creating a better everyday life for people.

 

As Block says, “We are just getting started.”

 

References

Barrett, B., 2019. Ikea’s Slow and Steady Plan to Save the Smart Home. [Online]
Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/ikea-fyrtur-smart-blinds/
[Accessed 9 September 2019].

Chandler, S., 2019. IKEA Smart Home Investment Could Be Boost The Internet Of Things Needs. [Online]
Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonchandler/
[Accessed 9 September 2019].

Gartenberg, C., 2019. Ikea’s smart blinds have been delayed to later in 2019. [Online]
Available at: https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/
[Accessed 9 September 2019].

IKEA, 2019. IKEA invests heavily in the smart home going forward. [Online]
Available at: https://newsroom.inter.ikea.com/news/
[Accessed 9 September 2019].

IKEA, n.d.. Smart home. [Online]
Available at: https://www.ikea.com/gb/en/product-guides/ikea-home-smart-system/
[Accessed 9 September 2019].

Newman, P., 2019. IKEA is looking to broaden its smart-home ecosystem with a new business unit. [Online]
Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/
[Accessed 9 September 2019].

5/5 (1)

Please rate this