Amazon One: The Disruption of Banking

29

September

2020

No ratings yet.

Recently, Amazon introduced palm recognition software in its physical Amazon One stores. The technology turns your hand into a payment device, by identifying that it is you. It creates a signature by combining both palm surface area details as well as vein patterns. The company plans to expand its innovation to third parties, like retail shops.

It is yet another example of how big tech companies are trying to gradually disrupt the traditional banking industry. Likewise, in 2014 Apple launched Apple Pay turning your mobile phone into a wallet. Five years after introduction, an estimated 43% of all iPhone users have used Apple pay at least once. This amounts to a total of 383 million Apple Pay users worldwide.

In response to the rise of tech firms, traditional banks are trying to become tech-minded. In 2017, ING CEO Ralph Hamers told that the bank wants be perceived as a tech company with a banking license. Transforming its business model and mindset, however, will take time. Time that they, given the recent developments, will not have in excess.

Currently, technologies like Apple Pay and Amazon One make use of traditional banking services, by connecting to your bank’s app or credit card. In this way, they surpass the lengthy process of getting a banking license. In the future, however, it is not unthinkable that tech firms will apply for banking licenses. According to the Wall Street Journal, Amazon is negotiating a partnership with J.P. Morgan Chase to start offering checking accounts as well.  With their prominent data position and possession of software ecosystems, tech multinationals are likely to stand a good chance at quickly gaining market share in the banking industry. Access to transaction data, however, is yet another step in acquiring complete knowledge about us, as consumers of their services. Given the track record of big tech and a lack of appropriate regulations our privacy is, once more, at stake.

 

References

https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/29/21493094/amazon-one-palm-recognition-hand-payments-amazon-go-store

https://www.ing.com/Newsroom/News/We-want-to-be-a-tech-company-with-a-banking-license-Ralph-Hamers.htm

https://www.paymentscardsandmobile.com/apple-pay-adoption-continues-to-rise/

https://www.verdict.co.uk/big-tech-banking/

Please rate this

Cybercrime on the rise: when data becomes a liability

8

September

2020

No ratings yet.

Nowadays, data is at the core of almost every competitive business. Worldwide, the amount of data stored doubles every two years. The increasing amount of data and its growing importance, however, also make way for new types of cybercrime. Besides, the Dutch Ministry of Justice last week announced that the amount of denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks monitored, surged in the last couple of months. On top of that, the sophistication of these attacks grew as well. Hence, cybercrime is on the rise yet the importance of data security seems to be underestimated.

Around the world, businesses and governments become more dependent on data. Additionally, as a result of the interconnectivity of systems one data leak can expose a strain of vulnerabilities across organizations. In 2020, the Dutch Institute for Vulnerability Disclosure, a privately owned center for information system vulnerabilities, notified the Dutch government about a data leak at more than 900 Dutch companies. The National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security (NCSC), responsible for handling this threat, only informed public authorities and ‘vital’ companies about the breach. In response to a newspaper article about the incident, the Ministry mentioned that Dutch law currently does not allow the government to warn non-essential organizations about possible cyberattacks. However, also companies responsible for securing data are lagging. According to experts, businesses stall important updates and do not adequately secure their systems. A recent security breach at Apollo Vredenstein, a Dutch tire manufacturer, revealed that the company used machinery and software that had not been updated for over 10 years.

A lack of capacity and knowledge at the governmental agencies and businesses, as well as, inadequate regulations to prevent cybercrime threaten the future of our data-driven society. In order to prepare ourselves, data security needs to become a top priority. This means that governments need to invest heavily in the detection of cybercrime and work together with the companies and institutions owning data.

References:
https://nos.nl/artikel/2346721-steeds-meer-ddos-aanvallen-op-bedrijven-en-organisaties.html#:~:text=Steeds%20meer%20bedrijven%20en%20organisaties%20worden%20getroffen%20door%20DDoS%2Daanvallen.&text=Verscheidene%20bedrijven%20en%20organisaties%20zijn,de%20zwaarste%20aanval%20124%20Gbps.
https://fd.nl/ondernemen/1353350/overheid-wist-wie-kwetsbaar-was-maar-liet-bedrijven-toch-gehackt-worden
https://fd.nl/ondernemen/1353014/hack-apollo-vredestein-legt-zwakke-cyberbeveiliging-bij-bedrijven-bloot

Please rate this