Vacancy: data generator wanted! $$$

8

October

2020

No ratings yet.

Data is more valuable than gold. This is a phrase we hear a lot! But, why is this the case, and who is making the money here?

Data has become extremely valuable over the past years. Researchers say that in the last decade we have produced more data than in our entire history. What do seven out of the top 10 most valuable companies have in common? They are all tech companies that either rely on data for their revenue streams or data strengthens their sustainable competitive advantages. Companies such as Amazon, Google, and Facebook all have the same strategy on collecting and using data.

Why is data so important? Well, data can be used for various reasons. From analyzing why people like cat videos, to which products are better to be sold together to even saving human lives. Yuval Noah Harari said in his book 21 Lessons for the 21st Century that whoever owns the data owns the future. This is not a strange quote as we have all seen what happened during the 2016 US elections. It has been established that Russian hackers interfered during these elections by posting fake news and targeting US citizens by influencing their voting behavior.

So, who generates this valuable data then? We! We are the product that these influential companies are exploiting. Every day hundreds of terabytes of data are created, and it’s only going to become more and more as the estimation is that by the year 2030, there will be 125 billion connected devices in the world. In 2018, the joined revenue of Google, Facebook, and was 236 billion US dollars. Will this become more when we will generate more data in the future? I think it will, but why are we – the product – not being paid for this valuable revenue-generating asset?

Of course, lots of people protect their data from being abused, but many and I mean many people not. The tradeoff between privacy and usage is different for every person. However, why can’t people make a tradeoff between privacy and money? If you need the money and don’t take your privacy so seriously, you should at least be paid for this. This is exactly what some start-ups have made possible. For example, the company Brave Shields is a browser that blocks ads and trackers and gives you the opportunity to decide whether to allow these ads to be rewarded in “basic attention tokens”. Moreover, the company digi.me helps users to store their data created from your Fitbit, Spotify, and social media accounts, and provide insights that were only accessible for large data companies in the past. Another example is UBDI, Universal Basic Data Income, which helps users to collect money by sharing their anonymous insights. Companies buy these studies and users get paid in money or UBDI points.

Thus, will this become the future? Will these multinational companies start paying for our data? Will this be the start of a universal basic income in the AI economy? Or are there other ways we will be compensated for our data generation? Please let me know in the comments what you think!

https://medium.com/@ashjo/how-can-data-be-more-valuable-than-gold-find-out-below-166d844c6664

https://www.ted.com/talks/jennifer_zhu_scott_why_you_should_get_paid_for_your_data/transcript#t-59722

https://medium.com/swlh/our-personal-data-is-a-lot-more-valuable-than-we-can-imagine-60af3b920da0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections

https://www.amazon.com/Lessons-21st-Century-Yuval-Harari/dp/0525512179/ref=sr_1_1?crid=23X46QA3R9U9G&keywords=21+lessons+for+the+21st+century+by+yuval+noah+harari&qid=1561820525&s=gateway&sprefix=21+Lessons+%2Caps%2C151&sr=8-1

Please rate this

The Dark Side of Videoconferencing: Zoombombing

19

September

2020

5/5 (2)

Imagine following one of the Zoom lectures of prof Ting Li or prof Yashar Ghiassi-Farrokhfal and suddenly being interrupted by a troll trying to pull off a prank. This is called “Zoombombing” and it means that an uninvited person invades a Zoom meeting and tries to interrupt this. However, Zoom bombers are not bored teenagers trying to get some laughs from their classmates anymore. Nowadays, these are organized attacks trying to shock and disturb innocent people with extreme messages.

As we all started to use the videoconferencing app more and more since the outbreak of COVID-19, these Zoom bombings started to happen more often too. Unfortunately, the messages started to become darker and darker. From racist, sexist to even sexual child abuse material was shown by the Zoom bombers. Moreover, these events are also being used to advocate extreme political messages.

Some examples of disturbing hijacks are trolls who in March communicated that “Alcohol is so good!” during an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting in New York. Also, in April a Zoom raider who invaded an online Holocaust memorial service in Berlin showed images of Adolf Hitler. Several people reported they can’t get the distressing images out of their heads. Footage of these hijacks also started to circulate on other social media platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter which enforced the bad intentions of the hijackers.

There are of course some measurements that people can set to protect their Zoom meeting. Zoom has released a guidance guide to inform its users on how to make their conferences more secure. Furthermore, they announced on the 5th of April 2020 some features to enhance the security enabled by default.

From my perspective, the problem is caused by major tech firms. Their business operations are all about speed, speed, and speed. The tech climate is very competitive, and firms need to move quickly to survive. However, during the race, they (deliberately) forget to think about the ethics of tech. The CEO of Zoom reported to the NY Times: “We were focusing on business enterprise customers,” Mr. Yuan said. “However, we should have thought about ‘What if some end-user started using Zoom’” for nonbusiness events, “maybe for family gatherings, for online weddings.” He added: “The risks, the misuse, we never thought about that.” Fiesler and Garrett (2020) us the term “ethical debt” to describe the societal harms issued by choosing the easy option in software development.

So, what could we do about this? Bad people with bad intentions will always exist. Therefore, future software engineers and developers should think about how their technology could be abused and how to make it as difficult as possible to do so. This could be done by creating a “user persona”, and to try to imagine all kinds of different personas and scenarios one could use the technology for. Moreover, we – information students – should be taught on the ethics of tech and how we will incorporate it into our future work.

Do you have other thoughts regarding this issue? Please let me know in the comments!

Sources

https://www.howtogeek.com/667183/what-is-zoombombing-and-how-can-you-stop-it/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/03/technology/zoom-harassment-abuse-racism-fbi-warning.html
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/m7je5y/zoom-bombers-private-calls-disturbing-content
https://blog.zoom.us/a-message-to-our-users/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/08/business/zoom-video-privacy-security-coronavirus.html
https://www.wired.com/story/opinion-ethical-tech-starts-with-addressing-ethical-debt/

Please rate this