Digital Transformation Project – Personalized Insurance at Zurich

13

October

2016

No ratings yet.

This digital transformation project aims to transform one of the world’s largest and most influential insurance companies – Zurich Insurance Group Ltd. Just like most of the insurance companies in the world, Zurich Insurance currently runs a traditional insurance business model with minor to medium levels of IT integration in their daily operations. What we are proposing is a new concept called ‘insurance personalization’ which could transform the way Zurich Insurance Group conducts its business. In detail, we propose a solution based on Internet of Things (IoT) technology for Zurich’s car and home insurance business.

We identified two major challenges Zurich is facing at the moment: (1) Consumer demand personalized insurance and (2) Entry barriers have been reduced and new entrants (i.e. startups) are entering the market.

About Zurich

Zurich Insurance Group has an annual revenue of 68 billion USD. They currently operate in over 170 countries with 55,000 employees and clients ranging from individuals, small medium enterprises to multinational corporations. Its current business segments include General Insurance, Global life, and farmers. In order to simplify the current business model of Zurich Insurance, we have broken it down into the following three components:

  1. Underwriting and investing – insurer select risks to be insured and value of premium to be charged
  2. Claim – claims are investigated by claim adjusters and often involves disputes and litigations
  3. Marketing

Solution

The proposed solution for Zurich’s car insurance business consists of two major components, (1) a driving assistant that monitors driver behavior and (2) a smart vehicle extension that transmits critical information about the condition and health of a car using sensor technology. There are three distinct ways in which Zurich will benefit from the proposed solution:

  1. Customers will have a more valuable experience with Zurich. So far, the only value customers usually extracted from the insurer was in case of claims, that is, when it was already too late and something severe happened. Applications such as the driver assistant or the smart vehicle extension will show the customer that Zurich is actively involved in protecting them before something happened. If, for example, the smart vehicle extension detects that a part of a car is about to break down, it can inform the insurer as well as the driver and appropriate measures can be taken to fix the part.
  2. The collected real-time and complex data will allow Zurich to fundamentally change their underwriting process. With the new IoT solution, Zurich is able to assess personal risks on an ongoing basis.
  3. Customers will interact with Zurich more frequently, creating a feeling of a more personal relationship with the company. Creating a more personal relationship is the key for Zurich to close the trust gap between them and their customers.

Recommendations

Based on our analysis, we have have the following recommendations for Zurich:

  • Act proactively, not reactively – do not just blindly follow what is unfolding in their industry, it is the right time to innovate
  • Partner up with startups
  • Focus on the customer
  • Reconfigure the business for change

 

~Group 69

 

Please rate this

Hello Google Pixel! Hello innovation?

4

October

2016

5/5 (3)

So Google just launched their new smartphone, Google Pixel. Does it come with some cool new features? Yes! Is it revolutionary? Probably not (yet). So let me give you a quick rundown of what has been said at the Google event today.

To begin with, Google believes that the future lies in machine learning and AI. Most importantly, they believe that it’s going to be the intersection of hardware and software where machine learning and AI are going to have the greatest impact. For that given reason, Google decided to build the new smartphone Pixel – allowing for a seamless integration of hardware and software. Wait, that concept seems surprisingly familiar, doesn’t it? Exactly! That’s what Apple is already doing for decades and decades (and probably was one of the main reasons for their success). This concept is also not really new for Google either. In the past, Google has launched smartphones under the Nexus series, with limited success however (Forbes, 2015). Anyways, Google’s decision to continue that route makes a lot of sense in the new AI/machine learning context. So what’s the problem?

For me, the most promising feature of Pixel definitely is the Google assistant. It’s purpose is to help you and me in our daily lives and go beyond how apps and the phone in general has helped us in the past. From what I’ve seen so far, it sadly seems to be more or less an improved Siri (yes, I am an iPhone user). But I can definitely see the potential of the technology and I believe the really exciting applications of AI are still to come – that’s why there is the “yet” in the introduction. And don’t get me wrong, reserving a spot in a restaurant just with a few instructions that you tell your phone is of course quite a cool thing. I’m just missing that “Wow” effect – in the end, it still only saves you a few clicks.

Besides the first disappointment on the AI side of things, there were some other things Apple and other providers can learn from. Unlimited storage space! Yes, the new Pixel comes with unlimited storage space for photos and videos. What is even more, the phone holds for 7 (!) hours just after charging it for 15 minutes. Oh and not to forget, Pixel still has a regular headphone jack.

Not only did Google reveal their new phone today, but also other products including a new VR headset, Google Wifi, Google Home and 4K Chromecast. To check the full event, follow this link.

I’m interested in what your thoughts are on the Google event today and in particular the Google Pixel. So let me know in the comment section below!

 

More useful information

Google Pixel website: https://madeby.google.com/phone/

Detailed summary of all new devices: http://thenextweb.com/google/2016/10/04/google-pixel-event-october-2016/

 

 

References

Featured image: The Next Web (2016, October 3). Retrieved October 4, 2016, from Google Pixel Smartphones leaked by carphone warehouse: http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2016/10/03/google-pixel-smartphones-leaked-by-carphone-warehouse/#gref

Silbert, S. (2015, September 30). Fortune.com. Retrieved October 4, 2016, from Nexus phones will never see huge sales—but here’s why they don’t need to: http://fortune.com/2015/09/30/google-nexus-smartphones-about-innovation-not-sales/

Made by Google event (2016, October 4). Retrieved October 4, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4y0KOeXViI

 

Please rate this

BookStash.nl: Experiences From Platform Design

27

September

2016

5/5 (1)

Fitting to this week’s subject of platform mediated networks, I’d like to share some experiences I’ve made building my own platform together with a friend back in Maastricht.
 
Background story
 
During our Bachelor time in Maastricht, a good friend of mine, Oskar, and I early realised that both of us were fascinated by the idea of starting our own project. So we spent some time brainstorming and went on the hunt to spot some good opportunities. It didn’t take us long until we found a problem that was not only bothering us two, but also many of our other friends:
 
Since almost every course at university requires you to buy a book and new books are super expensive, the second-hand book market is booming (I guess that’s the case in almost every student city). Almost all of the second-hand books are sold on Facebook, where buyers and sellers connect and communicate via dedicated Facebook groups (e.g. “Second-hand Book Market Maastricht”). The biggest problem with these groups is, however, that the posts appear chronologically, similar to how your personal timeline works. This means that with an increasing amount of listings being created, things quickly become quite messy. Without a search function, you find yourself scrolling through endless posts until you finally find the book you were looking for. And from a seller perspective, you need to ensure that your post stays on top of the list to be found by other students. At this point it was clear to us that we wanted to change something about this annoying and inefficient part of buying used books via Facebook. Determined to make a change, we soon had to make the frustrating realisation that without any programming knowledge whatsoever, it is hard to impossible to build something on your own.
 
It would take almost until the end of our studies that this situation changed. Coming back from our exchange semesters abroad, we both figured out that there was more than one month left until university would start again. So we decided to move back to Maastricht earlier and learn some programming. After 3 weeks of intense online courses we felt that we were finally able to build the application we envisioned almost 2 years earlier – BookStash was born.
 
Why am I telling you this story and how does it relate to our course content you might ask? According to Eisenmann, Parker & van Alstyne (2006) “[p]roducts and services that bring together groups of users in two-sided networks are [referred to as] platforms”. The web application we’ve built, BookStash, is a good example of such a platform. On the one side there are the sellers of used books and on the other side students who are looking to buy used books. BookStash serves as the intermediary platform that facilitates the transactions of both sides of the equation. Fitting to this week’s subject of platform mediated networks, I’d like to share some thoughts on this topic and discuss two key points taken from the literature.

 

1. Pricing the platform
 
Two-sided networks typically have a “money” and a “subsidy” group of users (Eisenmann, Parker & van Alstyne, 2006) – remember the bar example from the lecture. Ideally, you as the platform provider know which side of your network belongs to which group. Attracting many users on the subsidy side will bring more money-side users to the platform. An increased presence of money-side users, in turn, will drive more subsidy-side users to the platform. Especially for platforms that just launched, this “penguin” problem is particularly challenging though. Why should subsidy-side users sign up when there are few to none money-side users? And why would money-side users pay money when there are almost no customers for them?
 
Let’s have a look at BookStash. Both sides, sellers and buyers, are students, so their willingness to pay for a service is low anyways (i.e. they are both highly price sensitive). Besides the fact that we built BookStash more as a “fun-but-relevant” learning project and not to make money, it was clear that our main goal in the beginning should be to drive users on both sides to the platform. We decided that this is only possible if the service is free for everyone. Maybe when a critical mass of users is reached, we might think about charging a small fee for the sellers of books (the rationale here is that sellers would potentially just sit on their books if they cannot sell them so they are happy to make any money instead of none).
 
Taking BookStash as an example, it might make sense for new platforms to delay monetisation on either side until a certain user base is reached. Only then providers can start thinking about the “money” vs. “subsidy” pricing decisions.
 

Directory of books on sale
Directory of books on sale

 

2. Website registration: Value vs. Privacy
 
Most of today’s websites require users to register to access the key functionalities or content on their site (and so does BookStash). Providing personal information such as an email or home address is a very common part of the sign-up process. Disclosing such information is likely to cause some privacy concerns on the user’s side and might even scare people away from registering at all. This is why we don’t ask users to link their Facebook profile in the registration process but leave is as an optional point in your personal settings once registered. In contrast to the privacy concerns, people also know that without registering, they will not be able to take full advantage of the privileges and benefits of the website in question. Thus, there is a personal conflict between privacy concerns and access to value (Li and Pavlou, 2016).
 
While I certainly agree with everything that is stated in the literature, I’d like to bring up another point regarding the registration discussion. In my opinion you can argue for cases where a mandatory registration on a website actually increases trust and is a sign of quality. Since people have to go through the registration procedure and are willing to provide personal information, they show commitment and an honest intent towards the network they would like to enter. Sure, this argument is somehow weakened by the possibility of creating fake profiles, but I still would prefer to engage with somebody on a marketplace where users have to register with personal information instead of one without this requirement. This is also why sellers of books have to register on the BookStash platform. Interesting side note: Even though you could register on BookStash only indicating your first name, most people use their full name.
 

BookStash User Registration
BookStash User Registration

 
It would be great to hear your thoughts on some of the things I discussed in my post! Also if you have any question about the programming or web app project in general, just shoot me a message or leave a comment. Oh, and don’t forget to check out BookStash 😉

 

PS: The website wasn’t used for quite a while, so don’t be surprised.

 

References

Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., and Van Alstyne, M.W. 2006. Strategies for Two-Sided Markets. Harvard Business Review 84(10) 92-101.

Li, T., and Pavlou, P. 2016. What Drives Users’ Website Registration? The Network Externalities versus Information Privacy Dilemma. (Working Paper).

Please rate this