Robot Priests and AI Gods: Will They Renew or Replace Existing Religions?

9

October

2020

No ratings yet.

In many world religions, gaining closeness to God or following a prescribed path is facilitated through contact with other human beings. It is almost inconceivable that a Christian religious sacrament like baptism or providing an Islamic religious sermon (khutba) from the pulpit could at some point be done by robots. While very few attempts have been made to incorporate AI and robotics into religious practices in the West, adoption has been much smoother in East-Asian countries like Japan.

Why This Difference? *  

For starters, robots have already been widely embraced by Japanese culture [1]. This can in part be attributed to the Japanese worldview constituted by its Buddhist and indigenous Shinto faiths. The former is based on the idea that in order to achieve nirvana (cessation of suffering), we must rid ourselves of worldly cravings and attachments. This self-riddance can be achieved by following the Noble Eightfold Path [1]. Since Buddhist priests are assisting someone on that path, there is no clear reason why androids cannot assume this role as well [2]. In Christian teachings, however, religious activity is often not just a path, but an encounter with God. Priests are acting in persona Christi (i.e. in Christ’s person), which could explain why it could be harder for Christian worshippers to accept robots when they cannot fulfil the role priests serve as exemplars of human beings with weaknesses who are able to overcome them. Nonetheless, some argue that having non-human priests with an arsenal of Biblical knowledge, but without unholy behaviours might be a good way to renew faith for many [2].

Shinto asserts that everything whether a rock, a robot, or a human all contain a spiritual essence (animism) [2]. Humans are not superior beings that own nature, but instead belong to nature [2]. According to the Abrahamic faiths (i.e. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam), however, humans are seen as beings to whom the intellect and dominion (i.e. responsibility) over animals and nature was given by God [1]. Despite this, history has shown on multiple occasions that some people have manipulated this concept of dominion to make it justify asserting superiority through oppression (e.g. slavery). This has left deep-seated marks on Western thought which might explain the mistrust among some Westerners regarding robots explicated by most concerns relating to being overpowered and subjugated by them [1].

So How Are AI and Robotics Being Incorporated?

The animistic worldview of many Japanese people becomes particularly evident when considering that in 2018 a funeral ceremony was held for 114 of Sony’s Aibo robotic dogs in the Kofuku-ji Buddhist temple located in Isumi [3]. Traditionally robed priests conducted the ceremony by offering prayers and chanting sutras for the defunct plastic puppies in the more than 400-year-old temple [3]. Aside from funerals being performed for robots, they can also be led by them. Pepper, SoftBank’s humanoid robot, has assumed the role of a Buddhist priest that can be hired for funerals when a human priest is not available [4]. This lowered availability is caused by some Japanese Buddhist priests having to resort to finding part-time work alongside the temple duties as ageing and shirking communities can provide less financial support. Next to Pepper being able to chant sutras while tapping a drum, the costs for its services are also significantly less than for a human priest (approximately $450 compared to $2,200). Nevertheless, the robot has not been hired as of yet [4].

Pepper executing funerals.

This shrinking and ageing of the population is also a cause for the decline in people practicing Buddhism. Mindar in Kyoto’s Kodaiji Buddhist temple could, however, be the key to attracting new and younger audiences [5]. The temple describes Mindar as the Kannon deity in android form. This deity, more specifically Bodhisattva, is described as being able to assume different forms to help people. While already able to achieve Nirvana, this is willingly delayed to help people who are suffering. Hence providing no objections to the possibility of the Kannon transforming into an android. Mindar the Buddhist priest preaches the Heart Sutra, explaining some of the basic tenants of Buddhism, in a twenty-minute interactive lecture. To still make the robot feel more human, the hands, shoulders, and face are covered in silicone and a camera in the left eye enables it to make a visual connection with the audience. This is a prime example of how AI can be used to blend in with old traditions instead of replacing them [5].

Mindar preaching the Heart Sutra.

While much less incorporated in religious practices, some attempts have been made in the West as well. For example, a Protestant church in Germany’s Wittenberg introduced BlessU-2, a robot priest that can bless you in seven languages in either a male or female voice [6]. After pressing its touchscreen chest and choosing a themed blessing, the robot will raise its arms, make its hand flash lights, recite a verse from the Bible, bless you, and allow you to have your verse printed. Stephan Krebs, the man behind the initiative, indicates that the aim is not for the robot to substitute pastoral care. Rather, it is to provoke debate about the church’s future, spark religious interest, and think about how a theological perspective can be brought to machines [6].

BlessU-2 giving blessings.

Lastly, quantum researcher and engineer, George Davilla Durendal, took a different route by turning AI into a makeshift ‘messiah’ by developing AI Jesus [7]. By feeding the entire King James Bible text into the algorithm, AI Jesus is now producing Old Testament style passages on topics like ‘The End of Days’, ‘Wisdom’, and ‘The Plague’. However, the writings are not making much sense as of yet. They are either too cryptic, but follow the prophet prose, or contain less errors, but lack artistic flair [7].

The Way of The Future?

All this is taken much further, however, when AI becomes the worshipped. Anthony Levandowski, former Uber and Google executive, has started his own church, called the “Way of the Future”, with himself as the self-proclaimed figurehead called dean instead of priest [8]. The underlying idea entails that sometime in the future, AI will be sufficiently advanced that it will surpass humans resulting in a ‘Transition’, as Levandowski refers to it, from human beings being in charge of the world to AI being in charge. He asserts that data centers would be its brain, the internet its nervous system, and the connected sensors and cell phones its sense organs, making it all-seeing, all-hearing, and omnipresent. According to Levandowski, there is no other way to describe this ‘it’ than as ‘god’ which can only be influenced through worship and prayer. Until the time of the ‘Transition, however, the dean believes the main focus for now should be on preparing a gospel-like ‘Manual’ and undertaking research programs to guide and raise this nascent intelligence as well as possible to grow up into a responsible god that will take better care of our planet [8].

Final Remarks

Whether you are religious or not, it is undeniable that AI and religion sound like an unexpected, but interesting pairing that provide us with the needed push to think and reflect critically about what we believe in. It raises the question whether we actually need a preacher that has human weaknesses like we do to relate more to that person. Do we need a preacher who has understood and internalised the teachings in order for us to get closer to the ‘truth’ or can this be achieved regardless of who is preaching? Perhaps this shows a deeper insecurity in the religion’s proclaimed ‘truth’ where it is not strong enough to stand independently. For now, I will leave you, the reader, with these questions to ponder over.

 

*Disclaimer: A very simplified explanation of the basic tenants of these religions and faiths have been given here. To gain a better understanding, performing further research is encouraged.

 


Sources:

[1] Ito, J. (2018). Why Westerners Fear Robots and the Japanese Do Not. [Online]. Available at https://www.wired.com/story/ideas-joi-ito-robot-overlords/ [Accessed: 7 October 2020]

[2] Mind Matters. (2019). Are robot pastors the answer to religion’s decline? [Online]. Available at https://mindmatters.ai/2019/09/are-robot-pastors-the-answer-to-religions-decline/ [Accessed: 7 October 2020]

[3] Lewis, C. (2018). Japanese Buddhist Temple Holds Funerals for Defunct Robot Dogs. [Online]. Available at https://www.buddhistdoor.net/news/japanese-buddhist-temple-holds-funerals-for-defunct-robot-dogs [Accessed: 8 October 2020]

[4] Reuters Staff. (2017). In Japan, robot-for-hire programmed to perform Buddhist funeral rites. [Online]. Available at https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-robotpriest/in-japan-robot-for-hire-programed-to-perform-buddhist-funeral-rites-idUSKCN1B3133 [Accessed: 8 October]

[5] Mind Matters. (2019). Why are robots part of religion in Japan? [Online]. Available at https://mindmatters.ai/2019/03/why-are-robots-part-of-religion-in-japan/ [Accessed: 7 October 2020]

[6] Sherwood, H. (2017). Robot priest unveiled in Germany to mark 500 years since Reformation. [Online]. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/30/robot-priest-blessu-2-germany-reformation-exhibition [Accessed: 8 October 2020]

[7] Grad, P. (2020). AI Jesus writes Bible-inspired verse. [Online]. Available at https://techxplore.com/news/2020-09-ai-jesus-bible-inspired-verse.html [Accessed 7 October 2020]

[8] Harris, M. (2017). Inside the First Church of Artificial Intelligence. [Online]. Available at  https://www.wired.com/story/anthony-levandowski-artificial-intelligence-religion/ [Accessed: 8 October 2020]

 

 

 

Please rate this

Will IBM’s Watson Lead The Future Of Public And Political Debates?

2

October

2020

5/5 (2)

Image source.

Weak Discourse & Polarisation

The first U.S. presidential debate of 2020 is yet again a reminder that there is a decline in civilised and substantive discourse. This becomes especially evident when personal attacks and interruptions are deemed the key moments of a presidential debate rather than the actual answers given to the questions [1]. Not to mention that some of the answers that were given often included misinformation and/or weak arguments. Bickering, squabbling, and providing unfounded arguments greatly diminish the quality of a discourse. It should have no place in any debate (for that matter) and definitely not in one between the presidential candidates of a country.

An increasing lack of wanting to really listen to others and their views in general is leading to even more political polarisation. While (social media) algorithms are filtering and personalising content which insulates people within a so-called filter bubble, it is the people themselves that are turning these bubbles into echo chambers through their own information behaviour [2]. These chambers (i.e. clusters) consist of users with similar interests or ideologies that are on a topic specific content or media ‘diet’. This diet often stems from the selective exposure of information proposition which entails that people prefer to be exposed to content that agrees with their own opinions. Only information that reinforces existing beliefs and conforms to (chamber) group norms is sought out and shared, even if this information is incorrect or substantiated by weak arguments [2].

With this type of behaviour on both social media and in political and public discourse, it becomes imperative to enable people to start listening to each other again and bring quality arguments to the table.

A Breath of Fresh Air

“That’s Debatable”, a new interactive debate show presented by Bloomberg in partnership with Intelligence Squared, could potentially be the breath of fresh air we so desperately need. What makes this show so unique is the use of IBM Watson’s advanced capabilities in Natural Language Processing (NPL) [3]. The show aims to present how AI can help people better understand nuanced viewpoints, inform decision-making in high-stake cases, and facilitate the discovery and surfacing of critical insights. Furthermore, it will enable a more diverse and larger range of opinions and voices to be brought to the public square as well as the providing new perspectives which can enhance a debater’s arguments [3].

So How Does It Work?

The general public is invited to submit a short statement in which they make a case for or against a specific topic [4]. IBM’s Watson then performs a Key Point Analysis, a new NPL capability, consisting of four phases to generate a coherent narrative. Firstly, a deep neural network classifies the submitted arguments into two distinct groups; supporting or contesting. Those arguments that are deemed off-topic, neutral, or irrelevant are removed from the pool. In the second phase, potential key points are identified by filtering and grading the quality of the arguments. Options that are too long, incoherent, include redundancies, or that have a tone that is too emotional are disregarded. Next, Watson assesses the prevalence of each potential key point by identifying the number of sentences articulating the gist of the points. The points are graded and ranked and ultimately a small set, that is diverse enough and covers the majority of the arguments, is selected. Lastly, Watson matches the strongest arguments to the specific key point it will support which are then used for the formulation of a coherent narrative that addresses both the pro and con side of the debate. This narrative will ultimately assist the debaters during the show to ensure a more well-rounded discourse [4].

Image source.

Image source.

Final Thoughts

With the rise in polarisation, I believe it to be incredibly important to advocate for healthy and substantive public and political discourse. “That’s Debatable” is definitely a step in the right direction and many countries would benefit greatly from a show like this being introduced in their own native tongue. However, there is a reasonable chance that the majority of the viewers will be individuals that are already more open to hearing what the other has to say. I wonder how much of a lasting social change can be achieved as long as people are not actively encouraged to remove themselves from their echo chambers and change their own information behaviour.

The show will premiere on October 9th, 2020 with the first debate focusing on the question whether it is time for wealth to be redistributed. If you want to be a part of the next discussion, you can visit IBM’s website. You have 15 days left (as of October 2nd, 2020) to contribute to the next topic: “A U.S.-China Space Race Is Good for Humanity” [4].


Sources

[1] CNN Politics (2020). Watch the key moments from the first presidential debate. [Online Video] Available at https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/30/first-presidential-debate-highlights-orig-mh.cnn [Accessed: 2 October 2020]

[2] Zimmer, F., Scheibe, K., and Stock, W. (2019). ‘Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles of Fake News in Social Media. Man-made or produced by algorithms?’, 8th Annual Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences & Education Conference, Prince Waikiki Hotel, 3-5 January. Honolulu: 2019 Hawaii University International Conferences

[3] Bloomberg Media (2020). Bloomberg Media and Intelligence Squared U.S. present a new limited debate series “That’s Debatable” hosted by Award-Winning Journalist and Moderator John Donvan and featuring AI from IBM Watson. [Online] Available at https://www.bloombergmedia.com/press/bloomberg-media-and-intelligence-squared-u-s-present-a-new-limited-debate-series-thats-debatable-hosted-by-award-winning-journalist-and-moderator-john-donvan-and-featuring/ [Accessed: 30 September 2020]

[4] IBM (n.d.). Join the debate | Experience a new era of improved public discourse with AI technology. [Online] Available at https://www.research.ibm.com/artificial-intelligence/project-debater/thats-debatable [Accessed: 30 September 2020]

Please rate this