The Space Race: Suing against Progress

9

October

2021

No ratings yet.

When humans first set foot on another celestial body, the moon, in 1969, it captivated the world. This “small step” for man was the culmination of a decade long frenzy by the world’s two largest powers, the USA and Russia, to first put a man in space and then to put a man on the moon. When Neil Armstrong set foot on the moon and spoke his immortal words, the world was watching. After this amazing feat of human engineering though, the interest in moon landings started to fade, as after the first few landing the scientific benefits were declining and the main motive of national pride had been achieved, man left the moon, to never return. NASA had had its budget sliced by a large amount, as the propaganda-use of the moon landings had faded, and priorities had shifted elsewhere.

That is, until five decades later. Nasa announced the Artemis project, and to facilitate this, the agency allowed private companies to bid for the production of some parts of the moon missions, for instance the moon lander. The three finalists for the moon lander contract were Elon Musk’s SpaceX, Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin and Dynetics (McFall-Johnsen, 2021). The clear-cut winner for NASA’s mission was SpaceX, as it provided the best prospect for by far the lowest cost, which is why NASA chose the company’s proposal over the others. Besides this specific offer, SpaceX is miles ahead of its competitors, by actually developing reusable rockets and successfully launching and landing them from orbit, a feat no other private space company has been able to do (Fernholz, 2021). To combat SpaceX’s victory over the other two companies, Blue Origin sued NASA for alleged inaccuracies in its selection process (Koren, 2021), putting the whole Artemis program on hold (or even cancelling it) until the lawsuit is resolved. By suing, Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin is able to flatline progress towards space exploration for its own. This of course raises the question: should companies be able to completely halt progress in human accomplishment? While legal processes and due diligence are important, I think in this case a much better company is being stifled by a lesser company’s greed, and mankind is off worse because of it.

References

Fernholz, T. (2021). Blue Origin is still catching up to Elon Musk’s SpaceX. Quartz. https://qz.com/2037008/blue-origin-is-still-catching-up-to-elon-musks-spacex/.

Koren, M. (2021). Jeff Bezos Needs NASA to Listen to Him. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/bezos-blue-origin-lunar-lander-lawsuit/619831/.

McFall-Johnsen, M. (2021). NASA’s top official says Blue Origin lawsuit could delay human return to the moon. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-lead-says-blue-origin-lawsuit-may-delay-moon-landing-2021-9?international=true&r=US&IR=T.

Please rate this

Facebook outage: At what point does a tech company become too big, and has that already happened with Facebook?

6

October

2021

No ratings yet.

Because of Monday evening’s outage of Facebook and its sister services Instagram and WhatsApp, a large part of the world was without their favorite social networks for about six hours. This led to annoying situations for RSM students, as a Designing Business Applications assignment was due that same evening and the outage made communications difficult, but more importantly, it also caused many institutions to be without a means of quickly communicating with their dependents for some time. Both medical professionals and hospitals who communicate with their patients over WhatsApp and governments were unable to quickly inform people about the outages, as the very ways of disseminating information were down (Facebook down, 2021). This of course poses the question: how dependent on Facebook’s services are we, and is this dependency too large?

Since Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram and WhatsApp in 2012 and 2014, the company has owned the four most-downloaded apps over the past decade (Shead, 2019), as well as four of the five most popular social networks worldwide (Statista, 2021). Personally, I think this should have never been possible, and the acquisition should never have been approved. Last Monday’s global outage showed just how much we depend on one single company for communications, and that one simple error within that company can significantly hinder communications for a couple of hours.

Not only is the lack of communication annoying, an outage like this week’s causes economic damage as well. Advertisers lose money because of not being able to make use of a part of their services (Hsu, 2021), and small vendors were unable to sell through the social media platforms for six hours. While these economic consequences are admittedly not very large or of long-term consequence, they do further show the almost monopolistic role Facebook and its brands play in our everyday social and commercial life. So let’s just call Facebook what it is: a practical near-monopoly in social media, that should in my opinion be hit with some antitrust laws. If one single company can have such a large influence on worldwide communications, news output and general data, the company should be broken up and be returned to its original state of three or two separate companies.

References:
Facebook down: Six hours without WhatsApp. (2021). BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-58801814.

Hsu, T. (2021). Facebook’s outage frustrates advertisers heading into the holiday season. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/05/business/media/facebook-outage-advertisers.html.

Shead, S. (2019). Facebook owns the four most downloaded apps of the decade. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50838013.

Most popular social networks worldwide as of July 2021, ranked by number of active users. (2021). Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/

Please rate this