Open Banking Strategy of Incumbent Banks

15

October

2019

No ratings yet.

Back in 2014, ING announced it considered opening up the transaction data of their customers to external parties, resulting in rather negative media attention (ING, 2014). Now, five years later, Open Banking and the revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2) is soon to become commonplace and may instigate a seismic change in the financial services industry. But how do and can incumbent banks deal with this imminent change?

Generally, Open Banking refers to the ability for customers to authorize third parties to access their bank account data to collect account information and initiate payments through application programming interfaces (APIs) (KPMG, 2019). As a result, the barriers to entry the financial industry will be lowered, allowing FinTechs and so-called ‘challenger banks’ to compete and collaborate with incumbent banks. Clearly, this poses an interesting question for incumbent banks on if and how they should change their business model to stay competitive.

Screenshot 2019-10-15 at 13.58.03

Openness in the banking lending value chain (Source: DNB, 2019)

As the figure above displays, Open Banking opens up the value chain horizontally (through customer interactions) and vertically (in the value chain itself by unbundling). Currently, the traditional banking value chain is already broken up more and more as outsourcing is becoming increasingly important in banking operations (DNB, 2019).

In order to successfully adapt to Open Banking, incumbent banks should continue to leverage their status as safe and stable repositories of financial data but also proactively stimulate third parties to collaborate rather than to view new entrants as hostile. These collaborations lead to new ecosystems, built on the key assets of the incumbent bank, in which customers receive superior customer value through new applications based on their transaction data. As a result, incumbent banks have to share revenue, but collaborations will simultaneously offer opportunities for more diversified revenue streams. This way, incumbent banks can focus on their core activities while FinTechs can use their distinguishing technologies to create and capture new value. I believe the latter to be crucial for incumbent banks to retain and increase market share in the era of Open Banking. In fact, this strategy already seems to be commonplace in the industry as more than 90% of European banks collaborate with FinTechs (DNB, 2019). I believe this will continue to be the dominant strategy of incumbent banks wishing to stay competitive in a market increasingly populated with FinTechs, challenger banks and big tech firms.

What do you think? Will Open Banking revolutionise the banking industry? If so, how should incumbent banks approach Open Banking?

Sources:

https://www.ing.com/Newsroom/All-news/NW/ING-position-paper-for-the-round-table-Use-of-customer-data-by-banks-in-Dutch-parliament.htm

https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2019/05/open-banking-opening-opportunities-for-customer-value.pdf

https://www.dnb.nl/en/binaries/Unchained%20Supervision%20in%20an%20open%20banking%20sector_tcm47-380419.PDF?2019092711

Please rate this

Will Amazon keep us fulfilled?

15

September

2019

No ratings yet.

Since its establishment in 1994, Amazon has gradually become one of the largest corporations we know today. Consumers worldwide enjoy the retail behemoth’s excellent delivery service and product range at prices at which most competitors fail to compete. Nowadays, more than 50% of all product searches in the U.S. start on the platform (Bloomberg, 2016). Although the company certainly enriched the online shopping landscape, we should wonder if the company’s increasing dominance and power will keep us fulfilled if only few alternatives remain.

https---blogs-images.forbes.com-danidiplacido-files-2018-12-south-park-s22e10c01-i-got-fulfilled_16x9

A recent and avid example of the power and dominance that Amazon already enjoys is the tax benefits it got offered by the state of New York, totaling $2.8 billion for locating their second headquarters in the state. This tax incentive may exceed $5.5. billion if Amazon hires additional employees (CNN Business, 2018). But Amazon’s influence certainly does not stop there. Jeff Bezos’s “everything store” is living up to its name with not only a wide product offering but also as a dominant player in, among others, the web services, entertainment and digital infrastructure industry. The consumer and vendor data derived from that, as well as the network effects that come with it, may enable the platform to fully monopolize the online shopping industry.

The first signs of this dominance are already there, as several vendors start to speak out against the increasing demands of the platform for larger discounts and higher margins (Amazon’s Stranglehold, 2016). But this may just be the first step of the platform to leverage its power. Amazon already started to exploit manufacturing and vendor data to start producing products very similar to the ones offered by vendors on the platform (Amazon’s Stranglehold, 2016). The move to manufacturing, combined with the increasing dependence of vendors and manufacturers on the platform, may lead to full control of the value chain.

If this Amazon’s dominance becomes reality, we should hope for regulators to intervene, innovative ideas of other market players to flourish or for Amazon to not exploit its power. However, I deem the latter unlikely and as a result, a lack of competition might leave consumers paying the price. Amazon truly enriched online shopping with their low prices, quick delivery service and wide product offerings. However, the idea of having few shopping alternatives (such as Alibaba) should leave us wondering if the smile in the company’s logo will stand for that of the consumer or merely the platform.

What do you think? Will Amazon leave us (un)fulfilled if it becomes too powerful? Or will the platform’s dominance be held back by regulators and/or innovators? Or is it, like in SouthPark, up to the people to step up?

 

 

References:

CNN Business, 2018. Helipads and everything else Amazon is getting out of its deals with New York and Virginia. Available at:
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/13/business/amazon-hq2-subsidies/index.html

Bloomberg, 2016. More Than 50% of Shoppers Turn First to Amazon in Product Search. Available at:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-27/more-than-50-of-shoppers-turn-first-to-amazon-in-product-search

ILSR, 2016. Amazon’s Stranglehold: How the Company’s Tightening Grip Is Stifling Competition, Eroding Jobs, and Threatening Communities. Available at:

Click to access ILSR_AmazonReport_final.pdf

Please rate this