Facebook: will it stay or will it go?

18

October

2017

No ratings yet.

Have you ever wondered whether 10 years from now, Facebook will still be there? I have. Turns out that in 2014, two Princeton researches used Google search data and predicted that Facebook would lose 80% of its users within three years (Wakefield, 2014). They even went so far as to compare Facebook with an infectious disease: ‘ideas, like diseases, have been shown to spread infectiously between people before eventually dying out, and have been successfully described with epidemiological models’ (Quirk, 2014). Different sources also confirmed findings of the predicted degrade of Facebook. So, let’s have a look at how Facebook is doing three years later!

In 2012 Facebook went public and had a tough start. However, five years later Facebook has made an incredible turnaround and has become one of the five most valuable companies by market capitalization (Fiegerman, 2017). This may seem strange, since the general feeling around me seems to be that Facebook is slowly going down. However, when you hear Facebook, remember Facebook has acquired a total of 68 companies till date (Toth, 2016). The most well-known are WhatsApp Messenger (2015) and Instagram (2012), so the company is about more than just facebook.com.

One of the things that is viewed key in Facebook keeps proving itself is its adaptability. Not only related to design or features of Facebook itself, but also in terms of business models this seems key. For example, at a recent developer conference Facebook talked about the possibility of turning their additional products (for example Whatsapp or Instagram) from products to platforms, by opening up functionality to developers (Dawson, 2016). Secondly, Facebook has focussed on reaching less mature markets such as Asia.

Do you think Facebook will, using its continuous innovations, still be around for the next generation? Or do you believe it will follow the faith of its predecessor MySpace? Let me know in the comments below!

Wakefield, J. (2014) Facebook turns 10 but are its days numbered? [online] BBC.com. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-25953225 [Accessed 15 Oct. 2017]

Quirk, M. B. (2014) Researchers Claim the Disease that is Facebook Will Face Out in a Matter of Years. [online] consumerist.com. Available at: https://consumerist.com/2014/01/23/researchers-claim-the-disease-that-is-facebook-will-fade-out-in-a-matter-of-years/ [Accessed 15 Oct. 2017]

Fiegerman, S. (2017) 5 years after rocky IPO, Facebook is stronger than ever. [online]. Money.cnn.com. Available at: http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/18/technology/facebook-ipo-anniversary/index.html [Accessed 15 Okt. 2017]

Dawson, J. (2016) Why is Facebook doing so well? [online] recode.net. Available at: https://www.recode.net/2016/4/29/11586544/why-is-facebook-doing-so-well [Accessed 15 Oct. 2017]

Toth, S. (2016) 65 Facebook Acquisitions – The Complete List! [online] techwyse.com. Available at: https://www.techwyse.com/blog/infographics/65-facebook-acquisitions-the-complete-list-infographic/ [Accessed 15 Oct 2017]

Anna Haffmans – 380106

Please rate this

Technology of the Week – Disruption in the Navigation Industry

29

September

2017

No ratings yet.

Nowadays, whenever we go somewhere, we grab our phone and use a navigational tool to get there. However, it was not always this easy. Advances in information technology have disrupted information industries, such as the navigation industry, significantly (Shapiro & Varian, 1998).

For many centuries, a compass and a paper map were key instruments for navigation. However, this way of navigating was significantly disrupted when the United States developed the Global Positioning System (GPS). Using information received from satellites, GPS is able to locate a person accurate to about 15 meters. (GPS.gov, 2017)

GPS influenced Porter’s Five Forces for the navigation industry. For example, the navigation industry faced a higher threat of new entrants and a higher threat of substitutes. GPS offered a new, superior technology to the conventional compass and paper map, and firms were keen on using the technology for the navigation industry. TomTom introduced a new business model in which they developed both hardware and software to provide paid navigation services. Rivalry among firms increased because of all the new players in the market and prices started to pull down.

GPS, the Internet and the use of mobile phones also made the navigation industry newly vulnerable. The market became easier to enter. Due to the cost structure of information goods -costly to produce, cheap to reproduce- business models changed. Once several companies had sunk costs of producing the maps, competitive forces moved the price down toward marginal costs (Shapiro & Varian, 1998).

Companies such as GoogleMaps, Maps.me or HERE WeGo introduced a new business model, in which they offered free maps and based their revenues on the sales of advertisements. Companies who supplied stand-alone GPS devices had to rethink their strategy. As a result the industry shifted towards a business-to-business model (Privat, 2015).  

The future

We expect that navigation will become more personal and more focussed on business-to business in the future because of four important factors.

Firstly, the Internet of Things (IoT) will connect everything to the internet. As a result, the car’s navigation will be aware of its surroundings and do a better job in providing the fastest route, but will also warn you for approaching emergency vehicles, reducing the number of accidents (Privat, 2015).

Secondly, artificial intelligence will enable navigation to learn from your habits, schedule and preferences. It will compose base its advice not only on time, but also on your preferences for sights.

Thirdly, augmented reality will change the way of displaying navigation. Relevant information will be displayed in your field of vision. Navigation will be integrated into the windshield of your car, while smart eyewear will offer new possibilities for navigation for pedestrians and cyclists (Privat, 2015)

Finally, self-driving cars will increase the need for extremely detailed maps. In the future, navigation will not only indicate the best route, but will be driving the car (Privat, 2015). The advances in self-driving cars will increase the rivalry between firms and the focus on business-to-business (McKinsey, 2014).

 

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLJmP255Y9c&feature=youtu.be

References:

GPS.gov (2017). GPS.gov: GPS Overview. [online] Available at: http://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/ [Accessed 20 Sep. 2017].

McKinsey. (2017). A road map to the future for the auto industry. [online] Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/a-road-map-to-the-future-for-the-auto-industry [Accessed 26 Sep. 2017].

Privat, L. (2015). The Future Of The GPS Market. [online] Available at: https://www.belegger.nl/Forum/Upload/2016/9459903.pdf [Accessed 22 Sep. 2017].

Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. (1998). Pricing Information. In Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Stencl, M. (2014). Four Technologies That Will Change the Future of Navigation in 2014, Beyond. [online] Available at: http://insights.wired.com/profiles/blogs/4-technologies-that-will-change-the-future-of-navigation-in-2014#axzz4u4NJNIEt [Accessed 29 Sep. 2017]

 

Please rate this

The Future of Warfare: Robot Killers?

28

September

2017

5/5 (41)

For some years now, pre-programmed defence systems have been widely used in warfare. These defence systems are programmed to work in certain, predetermined conditions only (NRC, 2017). As opposed to defence systems that only react on threats, more recently developed autonomous weapons are able to identify and exterminate (human) targets. They can be sent in to unknown territory and learn while on the battle field, without any form of human intervention.

Critics claim that the use of autonomous weapons would escalate the scale of conflicts. The weapons could be hacked to behave undesirably by for example terrorists. Moreover, if the software does accidentally hit a civilian, it is unclear who should be held responsible for the mistake (NRC, 2017). Lastly, human rights organisations think that the barrier of starting a war will be lower for countries with autonomous weapons, since they do not have to fear human losses on their side. Proponents however, claim that the technology could reduce battlefield casualties and discriminate more effectively between civilians and combatants. At the moment no country seems willing to stagnate development of the technology, since being overtaken by other countries would expose them to risks.

In August 2017 leaders in the field of AI and robotics signed a letter urging the United Nations to illegalize the use of lethal autonomous weapons in warfare, claiming that these weapons would cause a ‘third revolution in warfare’, which would ‘equal the invention of gunpowder’ (The Verge, 2017). The petition is signed by over 116 leaders of companies in the field of AI and robotics. However, producers of autonomous weapons are not considering ceasing production. Especially in the US, who currently have a competitive advantage in the market, illegalization of these weapons does not seem realistic in the near future (NRC, 2017).

Let me know your thoughts on this matter below. Do you think that it is important to invest in autonomous weapons for defence purposes and keep up with other nations, or do you think we should cease production?

References
NRC. (n.d.) Niet Elke Killer Robot is een Bedreiging. Retrieved September 28, 2017 from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/08/22/niet-elke-killer-robot-is-een-bedreiging-12615666-a1570642
NRC. (n.d.) Landen en wapenproducenten negeren roep om verzet ‘killer robots’. Retrieved September 28, 2017 from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/08/21/roep-om-verzet-tegen-killer-robots-bestaat-al-langer-maar-landen-en-wapenproducenten-geven-geen-gehoor-12615880-a1570592?utm_source=NRC&utm_medium=related&utm_campaign=related2
The Verge, James Vincent. Elon Musk and AI leaders call for a ban on killer robots. Retrieved September 28, 2017 from https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/21/16177828/killer-robots-ban-elon-musk-un-petition

Please rate this