The algorithm’s increasing influence in medical decisions

9

October

2021

No ratings yet.

Artificial intelligence now outperforms doctors when it comes to making diagnoses. The computer is becoming increasingly important as medical data grows and demographic research expands.

Applications for various diagnoses

Tuberculosis

It is the software of a company called Thirona, located in Nijmegen, which was the first to determine whether a patient suffered from tuberculosis. In the meantime, this software is used by 45 countries and especially in rural areas in Asia and Africa. In many of those places there is a shortage of radiologists, so this is one viable way of being able to screen many patients in less time. The software is now on a level where it can recognize tuberculosis better than a radiologist.

Lung cancer

The human recognition of lung cancer has been outperformed by software as well. Small abnormalities are difficult to see on a breast X-ray. Only specialized radiologists can do it. But they must assess many photos in population screening and miss one in five tumors. For this problem, another company from Nijmegen, Screenpoint, has developed a solution via artificial intelligence. The product has been approved by the FDA and has achieved the CE-label in Europe. In July of this year, ScreenPoint attracted an investor who will put $28 million into further growth, mainly in the United States, but the company is active worldwide.

Pitfalls

Nowadays, we find it normal that companies like Apple and Facebook recognize faces. However, in the early 2000’s, computers were not able to distinguish a bird from a plane. It was only with the surge of big data when the recognition applications have improved significantly. All the estimates such kind of software gives, is based on input of previous times. The computer learns with thousands of images to recognize the characteristics of a tumor or other disease. So, the software only works when it is trained with archive images on which a radiologist has previously diagnosed a disease. Rare tumors for example, which are not yet in the system, will not be recognized by the computer, even if it has the size of a tennis ball.

Covid-19

The fact that artificial intelligence cannot succeed without training has been noticed by the company Pacmed as well. Pacmed came with intelligent software for intensive care (IC). The software had to provide aid for a doctor to decide whether a patient could be discharged. This was a difficult task, regarding the many different medical aspects that had to be taken into account. With the global pandemic, the IC’s were under big pressure and there was no space to come up with something new. Nevertheless, there resided a different population on the IC than before Covid-19. Luckily, Pacmed could use its infrastructure to collect much information from the hospitals. In this way, Pacmed could improve its technology and make better estimations on whether a patient could be discharged from hospital.

Distrust of doctors towards the use of software

The computer often analyzes medical data at least as well as a doctor. That doesn’t mean doctors are embracing artificial intelligence, though. On the contrary, there is a lot of mistrust against the use of software whose operation is not entirely clear. Makers of the software do try to explain how artificial intelligence works. For example, they design the software in such a way that the doctor retains full responsibility. But it remains a black box, which uses complex algorithms to derive intelligence from a large mountain of data.

The usage of software now depends on several enthusiastic doctors, who follow the developments in artificial intelligence and manage to get money for the software from the management of their hospital. However, the number of these enthusiasts is growing and many think that the usage of artificial intelligence is inevitable given the rise in the amount of medical data. In addition, the patients are proven to be better off with the aid of software, is that not already enough of an argument to fast-track this development?

Please rate this

Implementation of Blockchain in food products; are supermarket chains in the Netherlands lagging behind?

8

October

2021

5/5 (1)

Rising demand for credible information

Over the past decades, there have been occurring numerous scandals regarding the food supply chain. Examples of these are several meat scandals like the horsemeat scandal in 2013 and Brazil’s meat scandal in 2017, but also other scandals like the Chinese milk scandal in 2008 and the fipronil scandal in 2017. These have made a large impact on the awareness of consumers on what they buy (Pardo et al., 2015), and have highlighted the importance of quality and safety regulations. Next to this, the COVID-19 pandemic has increased environmental awareness and sustainable consumption (Severo et al., 2015), and has in combination with the other increments in awareness created a higher-than-ever need for credible information in food products.

However, most of the current systems used in supply chains to trace food products are not able to deliver the credibility that is asked for; it is either too difficult, not cost-effective, or even impossible given the traditional supply chain information technology (Francisco & Swanson, 2018).

Blockchain is the solution

Fortunately, Blockchain technology, which has been in the spotlight over the past few years and has been developing itself tremendously, contains the means to address this problem. Viriyasitavat & Hoonsopon (2019) best define Blockchain technology as “A technology that enables immutability, and integrity of data in which a record of transactions made in a system are maintained across several distributed nodes that are linked in a peer-to-peer network”. In other words, Blockchain enforces the integrity of information and could make sure consumers are provided with credible information.

Foreign supermarket chains

More and more supermarkets see that Blockchain is beneficial to its consumers and improves their trust in the food products that are offered. Carrefour, for example, one of the biggest French supermarket chains, is currently following more than 30 product lines on its blockchain. It states that this feature has boosted sales and aims to expand it to 100 product lines by the end of 2022 (Forbes, 2021). Also Wal-Mart, which has mainly implemented Blockchain to detect contamination and other food safety issues, is now tracking nearly 500 products with its Blockchain and will be conducting a pilot with U.S. Customs and Border Protection to track imported foods this year (Forbes, 2021).

Supermarkets chains in the Netherlands

Surprisingly, the adoption of Blockchain regarding food products in the Netherlands seem to be in contrast with big foreign supermarkets: Albert Heijn for example, has made the journey through the supply chain transparent by the implementation of blockchain technology for its own orange juice and eggs in 2018 and 2019 respectively. Although these were successful experiments, they remained a proof of concept. According to IT-specialist Marcel Yska, who was part of the team that was developing these projects, it had to do with the numerous partners and different locations that are involved in the logistic chain that all had to be put in the Blockchain. Next to this, he mentioned that the business case for Blockchain is not very strong because “you cannot lay the connection between Blockchain and improved sales” (VMT, 2020).

Jumbo, another big supermarket in the Netherlands, also has not come up with another Blockchain implementation since the experiment with its Tilapia (a fish species) in 2019. The reason for this remains unclear.

Final thoughts

One can argue that the foreign supermarket chains that are mentioned in this article are substantially bigger than those of the Netherlands, and therefore the effects of the implementation of Blockchain could be more visible. However, the growing demand on credible information for food product remains a fact, and the reasoning behind the stagnation of blockchain projects on food products do not seem to be substantiated thoroughly. It might be worthwhile for the Dutch supermarket chains to explore the possibilities with blockchain once more and do some more research on the consumer side. More and more experts are saying that Blockchain is here to stay. When also keeping in mind the progress that your foreign competitors are making with new technologies such as Blockchain, will it then not be wise to give the implementation of it a serious try?

References

Severo, E. A., de Guimarães, J. C. F., & Dellarmelin, M. L. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on environmental awareness, sustainable consumption and social responsibility: Evidence from generations in Brazil and Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 124947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124947

Pardo, M. N., Jiménez, E., & Pérez-Villarreal, B. (2016). Misdescription incidents in seafood sector. Food Control, 62, 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.10.048

Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018). The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency. Logistics, 2(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics2010002

Viriyasitavat, W., & Hoonsopon, D. (2019). Blockchain characteristics and consensus in modern business processes. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 13, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2018.07.004

del Castillo, M. (2021, March 5). Blockchain 50 2021. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2021/02/02/blockchain-50/?sh=1dfcb952231c

de Jong, M. (2020, February 18). Blockchainexpert Albert Heijn: ‘De businesscase om blockchain te gebruiken is niet echt sterk.’ VMT. https://www.vmt.nl/duurzaamheid-mvo/nieuws/2020/01/blockchainexpert-albert-heijn-de-businesscase-om-blockchain-te-gebruiken-is-niet-echt-sterk-10139857

Please rate this