The Job Hunt in the Age of Generative AI

29

September

2025

No ratings yet.

One of the most interesting fields I have used Generative AI as of now, is in the context of job applications. I often struggled with wording when creating my resume and cover letters, such as how to appear professional without being generic or how to modify the same experience for different professions. I was able to more clearly reframe my job experience with the assistance of tools like ChatGPT or Perplexity. For instance, they recommended me to reformulate lines like “Supported business development” into “Conducted market analysis and prepared client proposals, helping to improve communication”. Although it didn´t create anything, it did assist me in using more powerful words to express my accomplishments.

Meanwhile, I noticed that businesses are also beginning to use AI in their hiring procedures. AI-powered applicant tracking systems, also known as ATS, that search resumes for keywords are already used by some HR departments. Now, generative AI goes one step further by being able to autonomously create applicant summaries, create job descriptions and even recommend interview questions. In theory, this may result in a quicker and more reliable hiring procedure.

However, the risks are easy to define. AI adoption by recruiters and applicants may turn the process into a sort of “autonomation arms race”. AI-generated keywords are used by applicants to optimise their resumes and by recruiters it is used to filter them. In such a system, the questions come up: What is happening to authenticity? And by favouring particular educational backgrounds or language patterns, who makes sure AI doesn´t reproduce biases?

In my view, generative AI is most useful when it increases clarity rather than when it replaces human decisions. I think the difficulty in hiring is finding a balance between fairness and efficiency. When applied properly, AI can help candidates express themselves more effectively and help businesses manage high application quantities. However, there is the risk of turning humans into automatic patterns and keywords if it takes over the process. It is impossible for an algorithm to fully imitate human characteristics like creativity, motivation and cultural fit.

The key question regarding this interesting topic remains: How can we make sure AI not only speeds up recruiting but also makes it more transparent and inclusive?

Sources:
https://www.cmu.edu/intelligentbusiness/expertise/gen-ai-in-hiring_lee_100323.pdf

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02079-x

Please rate this

AI Tutors: Revolutionizing Education or Widening the Digital Divide?

18

September

2025

5/5 (2)

Classrooms are rapidly adopting AI-powered learning resources. Khan Academy’s Khanmigo, Duolingo Max, plus ChatGPT and large-scale models are reshaping student learning together with teacher instruction. AI tutors are able to provide personalized support, instead of traditional teachers who use a “one-size-fits-all” approach, because they adapt explanations and also exercises to the individual learners’ pace and their needs.

This topic is now touched upon by Duolingo Max, which provides simulated role-play talks using Artificial Intelligence. This function allows language learners to practise real-world situations, like ordering at a restaurant or talking about hobbies, in a secure setting. Khanmigo is a model that assists kids with scientific or math challenges. Furthermore, it also helps teachers by tracking students’ progress and proposing tasks that match their individual learning paths. According to preliminary research, students are more interested in the content when the AI adjusts the learning method based on the students ‘ needs, like summaries or practical tasks.

Reacting to the digital transformation, universities and schools are simultaneously experimenting with AI tutors as “assistants” rather than replacements. While on the one side, AI handles simple teaching or exercises, tutors concentrate more on deeper discussions with and among students. Universities and schools are simultaneously experimenting with AI tutors as “assistants” rather than replacements. While AI handles simple teachings or exercises, teachers concentrate on intricate discussions. A rural student may eventually have an academic level comparable to a student in a prestigious city school thanks to this hybrid approach, which ensures access to high-quality education.

But there are also challenges that schools and universities will face, which need to be addressed as well. Not all students have the same reliable access to devices or even the internet to be able to use this form of learning. This could actually widen the gap between those who are unable and those who are able to afford this form of learning. Additionally, accuracy could also raise a concern, since AI tools at times give incorrect or biased answers, which could impact students’ learning progress and might not be scrutinized by inexperienced pupils.

This brings up crucial questions: Will AI tutors actually bring educational exclusivity, or will they even increase the “digital divide”? Moreover, how much should we trust AI tutors guiding the academic path of our children?

What do you think? Is this just another tech hype cycle, or are we seeing the beginning of a true revolution in education? Feel free to leave your thoughts about this topic in the comments!

References:

Duolingo. “Introducing Duolingo Max, a Learning Experience Powered by GPT-4.” Duolingo Blog, 14 Mar. 2023, blog.duolingo.com/duolingo-max/.

Khan Academy. “Meet Khanmigo, Khan Academy’s AI-Powered Teaching Assistant & Tutor.” Khanmigo.ai, 2024, www.khanmigo.ai/.

Nichols-Barrer, Ira. “Does Student Attrition Explain KIPP’s Success?” Education Next, vol. 25, no. 1, 30 Sept. 2014, www.educationnext.org/student-attrition-explain-kipps-success/, https://doi.org/1026079/homepage-main-970.

Please rate this