AI Chatbots in Education: Concerns for Future Generations

17

October

2023

No ratings yet.

Over the last year, I have been using ChatGPT more and more to assist with regard to studying. This is also what I hear from fellow students: it is becoming increasingly helpful. This is due to the fact that ChatGPT keeps adding updates with new features and improved accuracy, as well as students gaining a better understanding of its capabilities. For instance, advanced diagram properties can be easily explained by an AI chatbot, which is something that I recently used. Anything you can think of which is relatively basic will be explained to you in a detailed and understandable way.

Moreover, writing essays or other texts has never been easier since there is unlimited inspiration available from these bots. However, several concerns raise the question of whether the active use of AI chatbots for academic purposes is a good choice in the long run. 

One of the main issues with utilizing generated content by such a bot is the fact that information is gathered from various sources, without citing a source. Often, when you do ask that the service provide a source, the sources are generated as well, resulting in fake sources (Welborn, 2023). In other words, there is a high risk of plagiarism that comes with using AI chatbots.

Apart from this, it is highly questionable whether student engagement is as high when they use these bots compared to if they have to think everything through themselves. If the chatbot is consulted every time a student runs into a problem, the student is likely relying too much on the service and could develop a lack of true critical thinking (Lo, 2023). 

Some argue that schools should focus on implementing the usage of the service into the programs, so students are aware of the risks that come with it (Halaweh, 2023). Personally, I think as using these services becomes more and more common, new generations are going to completely rely on them without ever trying to solve a problem by just thinking first. This could have a serious negative effect on newer generations’ academic skills. It can’t be denied that it is an exceptional tool to use for a wide range of applications, but actual problem-solving skills are not gained from relying on a service, but by trying yourself until you succeed. What do you think about this issue, especially with regard to newer generations, for whom it might seem that complete reliance on these services is normal?

Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in Education: Strategies for Responsible Implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036 

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of CHATGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Welborn, A. (2023, 14 maart). ChatGPT and fake citations – Duke University Libraries blogs. 
Duke University Libraries Blogs. https://blogs.library.duke.edu/blog/2023/03/09/chatgpt-and-fake-citations/#:~:text=ChatGPT%20is%20based%20on%20a,or%20write%20your%20literature%20review

Please rate this

AI-Generated YouTube Videos: A New Frontier in Content Creation and Revenue Generation

11

October

2023

No ratings yet. I stumbled onto a video that offered a tutorial on how to automate video creation and upload it to YouTube, in order to create a revenue stream (Think Media, 2023). I was intrigued by this since I was unsure of how it would turn out. It appears that AI is being used to produce content. This is accomplished by picking a subject that you believe will grab people’s attention and developing a variety of prompts to produce as much relevant content parts as possible. Visual, textual and audio content is generated in this way, which is then merged to create a video. Short videos are typically used since they are relatively simple to produce on a large scale (Think Media, 2023). Generating videos which are longer is challenging since it is more difficult to make them make sense. Next, after producing a significant quantity of this generated content, this is combined into actual videos to be uploaded on YouTube.

Thinking back to the content I have watched on YouTube and other platforms, especially short-form content, I realized that some of the videos that I have seen could very likely have been generated. Since short-form content has become very popular nowadays (Potrel, 2022), there is an enormous amount of views generated by this type of content, especially because in no time you have watched multiple videos.
Personally, I am not a big fan of the creation of generated content for YoutTube, since the point of watching videos is getting inspired or entertained by someone’s authentic work. It does not feel right to watch content that is not authentic, made by someone doing it just to generate a revenue stream. While it is still everybody’s own choice to watch videos or not, it seems like an even bigger waste of time to watch them when it is not even actual content but just generated nonsense motivated by earning money. What do you think about generating content for views? Let me know in the comments!

Potrel, V. (2022, September 6th). Five insights into the popularity of Short-Form Video content. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescommunicationscouncil/2022/09/06/five-insights-into-the-popularity-of-short-form-video-content/
Think Media. (2023, June 2nd). How to make 30 YouTube shorts in 1 hour using AI [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiA-DsGumxQ

Please rate this