Bridging the Generational Gap: Embracing AI in the Workplace

7

October

2024

No ratings yet.

Recently, I completed an internship at a major FMCG company, which gave me a firsthand look at how AI is being adopted in the corporate world. I have noticed that many students and young adults around me are increasingly turning to ChatGPT for a wide range of purposes, from seeking answers to simple questions to generating ideas for both their academic pursuits and personal live. This comfort with AI extends to the workplace, where I saw a significant gap in how different generations approach these new technologies. 

During my internship, I was often tasked with developing marketing campaigns and innovations. For these projects, I found text-to-text and text-to-image AI tools very helpful for creating quick prototypes for my ideas. My fellow young colleagues and I used these tools intuitively, seeing them as natural extensions of our creativity and productivity. Instead of relying solely on traditional design software, we could generate effective visual concepts in a fraction of the time, saving both time and resources. 

However, I soon realized that this was not the case across the board. Many of my older colleagues were either unfamiliar with these AI tools or hesitant to integrate them into their workflows. They often stuck to conventional design, potentially missing out on the efficiencies and innovative possibilities that AI technologies offer. This generational divide in AI adoption was eye-opening. While some departments in the company were already leveraging AI to some extent, I could see numerous areas where we could benefit more from generative AI, particularly in developing prototypes for marketing ideas. What struck me most was the lack of knowledge and, in some cases, willingness to engage with these tools among some of the older staff members. 

This observation led me to think about ways we could better support our more experienced colleagues in embracing relevant AI tools in their workflow. I believe that almost every company would benefit from implementing AI training programs, tailored to their specific needs. These could leverage the expertise of younger employees to help bridge the knowledge gap. However, it is crucial to approach this training holistically, because while highlighting the benefits of AI tools, we must also discuss their limitations and potential drawbacks. In my opinion, bridging this AI adoption gap between generations is key to maximizing the potential of these technologies in the professional sphere. 

Please rate this

Digital Disruption in Literature: The Future of Books

17

September

2024

5/5 (1)

Over six months ago, Michel Krielaars posted an article in NRC, a Dutch newspaper, that shows a great real-world example of the concept of digital disruption and its impact on the world of literature. The article references ‘La fin des livres’ by Octave Uzanne and Albert Robida, a century-old story that predicted the decline of printed books due to emerging technologies like sound recordings. Even then, the authors predicted that people would increasingly seek convenience and that turning a book page would soon be seen as too much trouble. This idea seems to be coming true today, as fewer and fewer people read physical books and new media are gaining a larger share (Krielaars, 2023). 

Krielaars highlights a significant shift at the Koninklijke Bibliotheek (KB) in the Netherlands, where digital books are now prioritized over physical copies due to space constraints. This change reflects the broader trend of digital disruption, where emerging technologies transform traditional industries—in this case, the publishing and library sectors. The rise of e-books and digital platforms offers advantages, such as increased convenience and accessibility. However, this shift also introduces new challenges and vulnerabilities. The article warns of potential risks, including cyber-attacks and political censorship, which could lead to the loss of knowledge. Unlike physical books, which act as a repository of cultural heritage, digital formats are more fragile and subject to these threats. This disruption showcases the balance between embracing innovation and safeguarding long-standing traditions in the digital age.

As someone who appreciates the benefits of digitalization, I find myself torn between its advantages and the concerns it raises. The ease of access to e-books and digital resources is advantageous as studying becomes more efficient. Yet, the potential for digital information to vanish due to technical failures or cyberattacks is troubling. This tension shows why physical books are still important, they are dependable and lasting sources of knowledge.

What are your thoughts on this shift? Do you believe that the convenience of digital media outweighs the risks associated with it? How do you see the balance between physical and digital books evolving in the future?

References:

Krielaars, M. (2023b, December 29). Digitalisering bedreigt de bibliotheek: waarom papieren boeken nog broodnodig zijn. NRC. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2023/12/29/digitalisering-bedreigt-de-bibliotheek-waarom-papieren-boeken-nog-broodnodig-zijn-a4185489

Please rate this