Apples: the best fruit by FAR

1

October

2022

No ratings yet.

On the one hand, the world’s population is expected to grow to 9.7 billion by 2050, requiring fruit production to double. On the other hand, young people are increasingly moving away from agricultural work in pursuit of urban jobs. As a result, when it comes to fruit farmers’ most critical activity, which is organizing the harvest, the number of skilled and reliable pickers is thinning. In particular, recent estimates predict agriculture employment to be cut in half by 2050, resulting in a shortage of around 5 million fruit pickers, more than 10% of fruits worldwide being left to rot, and a loss of about 30 billion dollars in sales per year. 

Tevel Aerobotics Technologies, an Israeli startup, is coming to the rescue. The tech startup has developed flying autonomous robots (FAR) that can select, pick, and box fruit ready for market. The technology combines cutting-edge algorithms, AI, and data analytics. In particular, AI perception algorithms deal with fruit tracking and data fusion; vision algorithms classify fruits in terms of size, colour, ripeness and so on; maneuver and balancing algorithms execute the harvest. The company’s mission is to transform manual fruit picking into on-demand harvesting. Flying autonomous robots will be able to work day and night upon request, and report real-time updates on the harvesting status, fruit quality and quantity. They will reduce operating costs, boost productivity and minimize losses. At the moment the company is pilot testing the technology in apple orchards in Spain, the US, and Italy, with promising results. It is set to enter the market in 2023.

Will Flying Autonomous Robots replace human labour? Recent trends point indeed in this direction. Are agricultural robots and automation good or bad for society? One should consider that to meet customer demands for higher-quality products, fewer pesticides, as well as more sustainable production, agricultural practices have had to change, with humans increasingly being treated like robots. Moreover, the industry is facing labour shortages while experiencing growing food demand. Agricultural robots and automation are not only inevitable but also necessary.  

References

Tevel (2022). Available at: https://www.tevel-tech.com/mission/ (Accessed: October 1, 2022).

Sciullo M. (2021). Le mele? A raccoglierle ci pensano i droni: il Piemonte apripista. Available at: https://torino.repubblica.it/cronaca/2021/06/21/news/le_mele_a_raccoglierle_ci_pensano_i_droni_il_piemonte_apripista-306926837/ (Accessed: October 1, 2022).

Please rate this

AI-generated Artwork Wins Art Contest

1

October

2022

No ratings yet.

Generating images from simple text prompts is no longer science fiction. An artificial intelligence software that uses machine learning algorithms and language processing models can take our words as inputs and turn them into original compositions. Firstly, it was Dall-E 2, a research project which only a few could access; that same technology is now available to virtually anyone. Indeed, other platforms have emerged in recent months, with similar functioning, thereby democratizing access to this technology. Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, and Pixelz.AI are among the most used.

Recent events revealed AI-generated artworks’ potential to disrupt the professional art scene. At the 2022 Colorado State Fair Annual Art Competition, Jason Allen (president of Incarnate Games Inc.) submitted three AI-generated pieces in the digital art category and took home the blue ribbon (first place), along with 300 dollars. Jason Allen used Midjourne (a text-to-image generator based on Discord) to generate the winning piece ‘Theatre d’Opera Spatial’, an image depicting women in victorian style robes and steampunk features.

Upon posting his victory on Twitter, Allen received significant backlash from artists and art enthusiasts. Some proclaimed the death of artistry and questioned Allen as an artist, others were outraged by how AI was actually ‘stealing’ images of other artists, and many requested Allen to return his award and apologize. While AI certainly did most of the work, AI is a tool just like a paintbrush: it needs a creative force and a mind behind it. Allen spent over 80 hours on the project; modifying the text prompts and ultimately choosing from over 900 iterations of the same image. Moreover, Allen did not hide the nature of his artwork; indeed, he signed his piece ‘Jason Allen via Midjourney’. Despite the jury admitting to not knowing what Midjourney was at the time, Allen’s entry did not break any rule (Midjourne is a digital technology after all) and the jury validated their decision.

Allen’s victory set the stage for a fierce debate on what constitutes art and who should be considered an artist: Should art contests allow AI-generated artworks? Should art contests create another category for AI-generated artworks? Is there actually a difference between using photoshop or other digital image-manipulation tools and AI? Does art need an artist, or does it simply need an author? Will AI-generated artworks make human art obsolete?

References

Roose, K. (2022) An A.I.-Generated Picture Won an Art Prize. Artists Aren’t Happy. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/technology/ai-artificial-intelligence-artists.html

Giovinazzo E. (2022) Un’opera creata da intelligenza artificiale ha vinto un concorso d’arte. Ma per molti è un imbroglio Avialable at: https://video.repubblica.it/tecnologia/dossier/intelligenza-artificiale/un-opera-creata-da-intelligenza-artificiale-ha-vinto-un-concorso-d-arte-ma-per-molti-e-un-imbroglio/424813/425767

Please rate this