Drone Art: Franchise Freedom on Burning Man

5

October

2019

No ratings yet.

Can you imagine walking around in the middle of a desert in Nevada, the dusk sets in, you’re surrounded by 80,000 people on one of the greatest festivals on the planet and you see a swarm of lights rising up above the partying crowd with soft tones of piano in the background? 

According to many visitors, it was one of the most touching, inspiring and memorable art shows they have ever witnessed and the highlight of their visit to Burning Man 2018:

“I’ll never forget peddling my bike faster and faster racing out deeper and deeper to witness this, my eyes fixated and staring mesmerized into the sky…. I rode so fast that when I turned around to talk to the group, I realized I had ditched them and was separated lost in the deep playa alone with beautiful piano music and Studio Drift’s flying artwork …. thank you for this special moment.”  

By using AI in a swarm of drones, art collective Studio Drift tried to visualize the concept of freedom and the relationships between individuals in a group. The algorithm allowed the drones to move around individually, as well as consider their relationship to each other in the swarm. This resulted in the unforgettable experience for Burning Man visitors described above. Click here to watch Franchise Freedom at Burning Man 2018. 

Nowadays, many concepts like robotics, self-driving cars and human-like robots take center stage in the debate on the futuristic applications of AI. Consequently, these debates resonate within the creative sector, and artists often try to visualize debates on philosophical concepts like freedom with these new technologies.

However, visualizing these complex, ‘fuzzy’ ideas with technology is most definitely not an easy process, which I became very aware of after hearing a short anecdote about the creation of Franchise Freedom. When I attended a seminar on AI, one of the creators shared a story of how the creative members of the team were trying to tell an immensely frustrated team of engineers they were ‘just not feeling the right emotional response’ when they saw the finished product. I can only imagine how many iterations (and discussions) this development process needed to lead to a satisfactory outcome for both parties.

In the end, they managed to find a way to communicate and create an unforgettable experience for thousands of people. But I can’t help but wonder how they ever managed to create clear documents like a fitting Software Requirements Specification when I think back on our own experience in the Designing Business Applications course. Or imagine if you are a consultant like Deloitte, trying to find new ways for your clients to create value with these new technologies, having to navigate all these different stakeholders. It looks like a very challenging, yet amazing job to have!

What challenges do you see in working with these kind of innovative, creative applications of technology? And do you recognize the struggle of quantifying ‘fuzzy’ business requirements in project proposals?

References:

  1. Amsterdamdroneweek.com. (2019). PRESS RELEASE | Franchise Freedom | Amsterdam Drone Week. [online] Available at: https://www.amsterdamdroneweek.com/news/articles/the-european-premiere-of-franchise-freedom [Accessed 5 Oct. 2019].
  2. Rea, N. (2019). Next Stop: Burning Man. After the Launch of a 300-Strong Fleet in Amsterdam, Studio Drift’s Luminous Drones Will Fly Over the Desert. [online] artnet News. Available at: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/studio-drift-burning-man-drones-1332377 [Accessed 5 Oct. 2019].
  3. Studio Drift (2018). Studio Drift FRANCHISE FREEDOM at Burning Man. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ixGWdzTah4 [Accessed 5 Oct. 2019].
  4. Studio Drift. (2019). Franchise Freedom — Studio Drift. [online] Available at: http://www.studiodrift.com/franchise-freedom [Accessed 5 Oct. 2019].

Please rate this

Are We Ready For Robotics In Food Delivery?

2

October

2019

No ratings yet.

The landscape of food delivery is changing fast. The take-away trend impacted many traditional dine-in restaurants. Then, platforms like UberEats and Foodora took over the take-away industry. Now, food delivery robots are on the rise: either flying through the air with drone technology like UberElevate, or cruising on sidewalks like the Kiwibot

However, these robots have not always been performing without mistakes. In 2018, a Kiwibot caught fire on the campus of the University of California, Berkely. In 2017, a robot ‘drowned’ when it fell into a decorative fountain. One witness of the drowning robot summed up his faith in technological innovation “We were promised flying cars, instead we got suicidal robots”. This quote perhaps reflects one of the important barriers to these innovations: will society accept robots in their life? If yes, under what conditions? 

There are some obvious safety risks involved in these experiments and the eventual realization of robotics in these everyday applications that need to be closely monitored. Whilst the Kiwibot that drove around in flames, or Steve the “suicidal” robot in the fountain mostly made people laugh, some autonomous robots have caused serious accidents, severely injuring people around them. 

In addition to safety risks, many people complain about robots taking over their jobs. For example, in this video – in which they are trying to steal the food from one of the delivery robots – one of the delivery employees from another platform gets angry at the small delivery robot cruising by, as she indicates it is ‘her’ territory. 

However, on a more positive note, for us as consumers drone delivery may enable access to restaurants that were previously out of reach, like ordering from your favorite brunch restaurant on the beach. Or it can become cheaper or perhaps even free to have food delivered with robots like the Kiwibots on campus or business districts. 

It is understandable that platforms are trying to differentiate their offer so they provide superior value to its customers, but are delivery robots or drones the way to do it? What value or harm do you see in these new ways of food delivery? 

Sources:

  1. BBC News. (2019). Bear spray accident hurts Amazon workers. [online] Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46468719 [Accessed 2 Oct. 2019].
  2. C., Rajko, A., Schumacher, T. and Wrulich, M. (2016). The changing market for food delivery[online] McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/high tech/our-insights/the-changing-market-for-food-delivery [Accessed 17 Sep. 2019]. Isaac, M. and Yaffe-Bellany, D. (2019). The Rise of the Virtual Restaurant. [online] The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/14/technology/uber-eats-ghost-kitchens.html [Accessed 20 Sep. 2019].
  3. Grant, C. (2019). Human-guided burrito bots raise questions about the future of robo-delivery. [online] The Hustle. Available at: https://thehustle.co/kiwibots-autonomous-food-delivery/ [Accessed 2 Oct. 2019].
  4. Fisher, C. (2019). Uber Elevate plans to deliver Big Macs by drone this summer. [online] Engadget. Available at: https://www.engadget.com/2019/06/12/uber-elevate-drone-deliveries-san-diego/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAKugXZb4aqLzRbS0ZrxUFL4DUmLIIkvE8mTb6mFq9gDv5GsERdQv6sMJwT8qo5IHJ-2QM2Yb4sHohSf-wVl0ksffoIsgLpgRy5PjlfZr4LyEAyjmqdKoSVjCZcLNyL3NuQdo4fcK7mV7NQG4zjWMtWHKaf5LV8taP0AJB9xo_cDj#targetText=Kate%20Fraser%2C%20head%20of%20policy,jump%20year%2Dover%2Dyear. [Accessed 2 Oct. 2019].
  5. Steinberg, Y. (2019). “He Looked So Happy” ‘Suicidal’ security robot called Steve is found drowned in a water fountain. [online] The Sun. Available at: https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/4053140/a-security-robot-has-drowned-in-a-water-fountain-and-one-witness-called-it-suicide/ [Accessed 2 Oct. 2019].

Please rate this

Barbies With Artificial Intelligence Are Here: “Barbie Wants To Get To Know Your Child”

28

September

2019

5/5 (1)

When I first heard about Barbie’s with Artificial Intelligence (AI), I was not sure whether to be celebrating a cool new application of AI or to be concerned. Several questions arose in my head: What kind of things will barbie say or not say? Who is allowed to program the AI? Is there even legislation in place to guide the development of AI in toys for children?

Many institutions and organizations focus on these questions on the ethical considerations in designing technology. For instance, The Center for Humane Technology originates from design ethicist at the biggest tech firms in Silicon Valley, wanting to make a change for the better. They raise concerning points on how technology has shaped our society in negative ways; companies like Facebook successfully manage to fight for a consumers screen time by creating addictive features like scrolling through content, exposure to social media sometimes creates unrealistic expectations and harms self-image, and some primary school children measure their friendship in Snapchat streaks. 

Another example of an institution that focuses on technology’s role in society here in the Netherlands is Waag Society. They organize Hack-a-thons to allow people from multiple backgrounds to come together and think about matters such as the application of AI in society, and how we should shape these in the most beneficial way. You can find interesting perspectives and discussions on their website, such as articles in which they propose to create a few key ‘design principles’ for these emerging applications of technology for children’s toys, to safeguard ethical principles in design and programming whilst legislation may still lag behind.

A third example I would like to share with you is the Next Nature Network, a network of people that uses science, art and education to discuss how we can find new ways to live together with technology. They have interesting publications and events to explore “how to dream, build and live in the next nature”.

Personally, I think that it is good to keep raising questions when you’re involved with new applications of technology, especially now the BIM program gives us the knowledge, tools and frameworks to be shapers and facilitators of these technological transformations.

And what about Barbie? A committee designing the toy has decided on her personality, what she will value and how she will respond. I wonder what her personality is like. If you’re curious, you can see the “Hello Barbie” talk here.

What do you think of a Barbie with AI? Would you buy it for your kids in the future? At the moment, I don’t think I will. But then again, that’s what most people said about the mobile phone in 1999 too.

Please rate this