Six letters. Not more. Google. So simple and yet so infinitely influencing our lives nowadays. A nice fact about the name is that Google is derived from googol which is a number consisting of a 1 with one hundred 0’s. A trillion only has 12 0’s behind the 1 so you can probably imagine how large a googol is. The reason they used it, is because it symbolizes the mission of google, namely: making all the information on the world accessible for everyone.
What does Google know about you?
From my perspective they are doing a great job so far, concerning this mission. Try to think about things that google doesn’t know about you.
Of course some private information won’t be in their databases, but besides that? Google owns android, which means that they have information about 87% of the smartphone users (Source: IDC, Aug 2016). Besides, google is the most popular search engine (which you would probably use on your smartphone if you are among the 13% non android users) and Google has its own web-browser. So basically google is everywhere on the internet. And do they charge you for any of their services? Not really right? But do they really just provide their service because they want to make all the information on the earth accessible? Are they really that generous?
Well, first of all, they of course have their advertisement revenues. But besides, there is also something even more important, your information. This information is crucial for google’s existence. Based on your information they are able to provide better search results. The can make an estimate where you would be looking for by relating a search query with an older one. Google wants to provide you with the search results you want to see.
Why is this dangerous?
However, there is one big potential danger with those specified search results. They could narrow your mind. ‘All the information’ also consists of wrong information or one sided information. For example, someone who is political liberal and searching for liberal topics will thereafter be more likely served with information from a liberal perspective, because google knows that the person wants to see that. However, by providing this one-sided information stream google is polarizing the thoughts of people.
It somehow comparable with information that we receive from the news. We make perceptions based on what we see, so news media have to some extend control over our opinions. A good example is the reporting of conflict areas. Our perceptions about how life in Syria is, for example, is based on what we see at the news. But is what we see on the news are right reflection of the actual situation?
However, Google is not a news medium. Google is an information medium and people expect to find the truth. I am not sure whether google’s information provision is based on the right concepts. So to conclude, that is why I advocate that Google should put more focus on objective coverage of information, instead of just focussing on what the user wants to see.
Reference:
http://www.idc.com/prodserv/smartphone-os-market-share.jsp