When people think about generative AI they usually talk about an increase in productivity, taking over redundant tasks, and predications on various outcomes. But companies such as HereAfterAI try to use generative AI to extend a person’s presence even after their death, of course digitally. Imagine having a terminally ill father or mother of a young family who records hours of himself in having conversations, telling stories, or providing advice and guidance. When the day comes and the parent passes away and an AI is taking over, allowing the parent to “communicate” with their family in the same tone and style.
While the idea may sound like a sequence from a ghost movie or a science fiction film, for families in grieve, this might offer an opportunity to live and deal with the loss. Generative AI can offer relatives a form of connection beyond memories, photos, and video recordings. Especially for young children getting to know their parent or asking them for advice and actually receiving an answer, might offer more comfort in grief and create an alternative way of living with that loss. Ramesh K. a grandfather to a young boy, decided to build a digital avatar of himself to allow his grandson to learn from his experience and advice.
While the idea might sound appealing to some, it raises a number of ethical questions and doubts. There is no scientific prove that being able to communicate with a dead relative actually helps or hinders the grieving process. Additionally, how are users protected from misuse and commercialization of their data?
While technological advancements, especially in generative AI, make many things happen, humans could not have dreamed of 20 years ago, it is important to draw a line when and where generative AI crosses a line. Is communicated with the dead already past that line, what do you think?
