The New Age(nt) of Storytelling: GenAI thoughts

9

October

2024

5/5 (1)

Since about a year ago, I started playing around with generative AI, mostly to render playful images making fun of my friends in specific settings.

I personally deeply value storytelling, as it allows me to immerse my friends into the story, sometimes even letting them interact with it as it goes. Being able to ask questions like “Imagine being there” or “What would be your reaction?” can turn a fun story into a great one in my opinion.

So when the opportunity arose to use tools like Stable Diffusion to bring the stories in my head to life, it made my life very enjoyable. I could heavily abuse GenAI to make fun of my friends, having a monopoly on a resource that was foreign to them. I would even go as far as saying that I managed to match a friend of mine with his current girlfriend, due to her accidentally seeing an image I sent my friend, making fun of their “romantic escapades”.

(Image of me making fun of my friend)

But eventually, my willingness to teach them about this amazing tool backfired, and they also started making fun of me – touché.

(Image of my friend making fun of me)

To my surprise though, even the guys who had previously told me that they disliked coding and “technology” were, in some cases, much better than me at creatively prompting their way to incite chaos in our group chats.

This got me thinking.

There will never be an easier time to give life to your stories through technology than today. And this will likely hold for the coming days, maybe even for the rest of our lives—assuming there isn’t mass censorship. 

As we age, many of us turn to digital entertainment to pass the time, whether it’s Netflix, Instagram, or YouTube. Today, attention is a commodity, and this shift in information economics heavily benefits the entertainment industry.

But what happens if the means to bring a story to life becomes truly decentralised when any kid with an overactive imagination and access to GenAI can create visuals that rival the CGI of blockbuster movies from just a few years ago? 

I think it will have amazing long-term benefits to how society perceives creativity.

Because realistically, there will probably come a time when most modern jobs can be replaced by AI-driven automation and robotics that handle manual labour. What then? Perhaps our value will no longer be defined by our ability to be productive but instead by our creativity, our ability to connect, and the stories we share. We may reach a point where we find meaning not in the grind of daily work, but in the act of creation itself—where everyone has the power to tell their own stories, inspire others, and shape the world in ways we haven’t yet imagined. A world where storytelling, in all its forms, becomes the new measure of human fulfilment.

Please rate this

AI-rtificial Dementia, How Technology Is Disrupting Our Memory and Brain Chemistry

18

September

2024

5/5 (1)

How much of your past do you truly remember, and how much of it could be just a figment of your imagination?

We all know that spending too much time online is bad for us, influencing our attention spans and for some leading to social media addictions. But the true, terrifying possibility of being online, is that it could very well ruin our memory.

A 2018 paper raised the hypothesis that the internet serves as an endless transactive memory, encouraging our minds to offload memory functions to our technology (Nijssen et al., 2018). Our brains recognize our phones and computers as an extension of our body and internalize that there is no need to remember certain parts or details –  if we can just access that information at the click of a button. 

Do you remember the last book you read or do you just think you do? Even if you read it from cover to end, it is entirely possible that your brain decided to forget most of it on your behalf. Because if your brain is acutely aware that you can easily access that information at all times, why bother remembering it?

This phenomenon is not only limited to minor inconveniences but plagues people from all walks of life alike. 

Health practitioners are overriding their own correct decisions in favor of erroneous recommendations made by decision support systems (Goddard et al., 2012). People who rely on GPS navigation suffer a deteriorated spatial memory; and taking photos to document an experience, reduces our memory of said experience – referred to as the photo impairment effect (Dahmani & Bohbot, 2020; Soares & Storm, 2018).

Understandably, we give up power to technologies that make our lives simpler, but it is still a pervasive problem in that we can not predict how this symbiotic relationship between man and machine will end. As more and more functions and decisions in society are automated, with more and more information being accessible at all times, are we going to be able to distinguish between ourselves and our technological extension? I remember a time when I had all of my family’s and friends’ phone numbers memorized. Today, I don’t think I know any other number than my own, by heart – and even then I second guess if I truly know it at times. 

Nowadays, your average person has easy access to Artificial intelligence(AI) as a form of decision-support system, be it for academic or professional work. I do not see a world where we use less of it as it develops, so it is obvious in my opinion that AI is here to stay. And with research showing that matured technologies have already done their damage, who knows how far this will go with the coming breakthroughs in AI? 

I do not think we should prevent the development of technology, but I do think we should refrain from becoming too reliant on them. As in an increasingly automated world, our dependence on technology may very well be eroding our memories and minds in ways we can’t predict. 

That is why I find it important that we occasionally ask ourselves this; How much of our past do we truly remember, and how much of it could be just a figment of our imagination?

References:

Nijssen, S. R., Schaap, G., & Verheijen, G. P. (2018). Has your smartphone replaced your brain? Construction and validation of the Extended Mind Questionnaire (XMQ). PLOS ONE, 13(8), e0202188. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202188 

Goddard, K., Roudsari, A., & Wyatt, J. C. (2012). Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(1), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089

Dahmani, L., & Bohbot, V. D. (2020). Habitual use of GPS negatively impacts spatial memory during self-guided navigation. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62877-0

Soares, J. S., & Storm, B. C. (2018). Forget in a flash: A further investigation of the photo-taking-impairment effect. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(1), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.10.004

Please rate this