The Future Of The Shared Economy

5

October

2021

No ratings yet.
Understanding the role of governance in the sharing economy | News | CORDIS  | European Commission

In recent years more and more applications and platforms arise that revolve around sharing. The sharing economy is based upon an obtaining, giving or sharing access to goods and services to everyone [1]. Sharing economy is also known as ‘gig economy’ and ‘platform economy’. The sharing economy is heavily technology reliant as most platforms are internet-based. Peer-to-peer interactions are necessary to provide goods or services and the success of companies or organizations who utilize this type of model are strongly affected by network effects [2]. Applications such as Uber, Airbnb and GO sharing are part of the ‘shared economy’ and they have proved to be very successful.

The above mentioned applications/companies are one of the most well known cases of the ‘shared economy’, but according to what services these platforms provide various subcategories can be made [3]:

  1. B2C temporal access to goods
  2. B2C, B2B or P2P temporal access to physical spaces
  3. B2C or P2P temporal access to professional on-demand services
  4. Redistribution platforms
  5. P2P access to knowledge, skills and money

B2C temporal access to goods

This first category entails business to consumer temporal access to goods, meaning that a company offers their goods for rental purposes for a certain amount of time. An example is the ‘GO Sharing’ application in the Netherlands. This application lets users (consumers) rent an electric scooter and let the user pay per km driven.

B2C, B2B or C2C temporal access to physical spaces

This second category involves business or consumers offering physical spaces for rent to consumers. An example for B2C is Stashbee in the UK. Stashbee allows consumers to rent a (shared) storage unit via the application. An example for B2B is WeWork, with enables business to rent an office space from one of WeWork’s location. Lastly, C2C allows temporary access to physical spaces, Airbnb is such a platform which allows consumers to rent an apartment/house for a certain amount of time.

B2C or C2C temporal access to professional on-demand services

This category entails offering professional on-demand services such as, fitness classes and taxi services. An example for B2C is ‘Classpass’, which is a platform that allows companies in the sports industry to offer their service such as fitness or yoga classes to consumers. An example for C2C is Uber, which we all know is rapidly growing and disrupting the taxi service industry.

Redistribution platforms

The last category are redistribution platforms, which entail that businesses or consumer can resell their goods to other businesses or consumers. An example of such as platform in the Netherlands is Marktplaats, or a more international example is eBay.

P2P access to knowledge, skills and money

P2P access to knowledge, skills and or money relates to the fact that the community can make use of each other. An example of such a platform is Kickstarter, where users can crowdfund their projects by providing information about it, in turn other users (peers) can donate money to the project and get specific rewards.

The sharing economy is a thing we can no longer ignore and more and more platforms will arise that will offer different products and services that satisfy the needs of both businessess and consumers. Do you think that in the future the sharing economy will be the norm and will replace existing businesses and services?

[1] https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/sharingeconomy_032017final.pdf

[2] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620300512

[3] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620300512

Please rate this

Augmented Reality in the healthcare industry

28

September

2021

No ratings yet.

At the moment AR solutions (not to be misunderstood with VR solutions) are used in a very wide variety of industries, such as the gaming, real estate, construction and educational industries. But did you know that AR is becoming more well known in the health care industry as well?

In recent years more life science companies are developing AR solutions to provide consumers with new therapies by combining the virtual and physical world. At the moment AR solutions are used in a very wide variety of cases, for patient and doctor education, disease simulation and surgical visualization. These types of solutions assist healthcare professionals and general practitioners make better decisions. An example of such an AR solution is an application that draws and maps a patient’s body and shows the locations of where the veins are located. This can assist nurses and doctors when it is the first time when drawing blood or starting an IV procedure prior to surgery. In addition, augmented reality is valuable for preparation for actual surgeries as it provides useful predictions of the outcome, which minimizes the risk of failure.

Augmented reality can also be used for tracking purposes by using applications. A distinction should be made between marker-less and marker-based tracking. Marker-less tracking entails that patients are being tracked by a stereo camera setup and 3D matching algorithms are used to follow them. Marker-based tracking means that patients are tracked by either fiducial markers or spherical markers. The spherical markers reflect incident IR (infrared) light which in turn are being recorded by a camera. Fiducial markers can be printed and sticked on a patients body, however this is less accurate than spherical markers. This is not only beneficial for doctors to better assess where the issue is located but also for patients. AR can assist healthcare professionals to better explain the symptoms that a patient might have by providing AR images that can precisely show what the issue is.

https://medcitynews.com/2019/09/the-benefits-of-ar-in-healthcare/
https://aabme.asme.org/posts/novel-augmented-reality-technology-to-revolutionize-the-health-care-industry
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17434440.2021.1860750

Please rate this