Navigating the Educational Landscape with Generative AI: A Deeper Understanding

12

October

2023

No ratings yet.

Recently, I stumbled upon a captivating video that drew intriguing parallels between integrating ChatGPT into education and the initial debates surrounding calculators in mathematics classrooms. This comparison prompted profound reflections on the very essence of learning. It hinted at a future where the art of essay writing, much like solving complex math problems, could demand a deeper level of understanding, all thanks to the transformative rise of generative AI, a trend that promises to redefine how we evaluate students (Jones, 2023).

Jones (2023) emphasises that incorporating generative AI into education transcends the mere adherence to predefined formulas. It’s about delving deep into the underlying theories and models, signalling a shift from rote memorisation to comprehensive comprehension. Just as in mathematics, where showcasing the process is as vital as the final answer, generative AI challenges us to grasp the principles guiding its responses.

Generative AI models, unlike calculators, possess a unique set of capabilities. They can craft new content, a realm far beyond the reach of traditional calculators that merely crunch numbers (Jones, 2023). Trained on vast datasets, these AI models discern intricate patterns and relationships within data, contrasting calculators that adhere to rigid predefined rules (Jones, 2023). Generative AI has the ability to make creative decisions, deviating from training data to produce innovative outputs, an aspect where calculators fall short (Jones, 2023). Yet, this complexity comes with a caveat—AI models, being intricate, can yield unexpected results, unlike the reliable and straightforward calculators.

My personal experience with ChatGPT illuminated these distinctions vividly. Initially, using ChatGPT felt like an academic shortcut, almost akin to cheating. However, as I delved deeper, I realised its true potential lay in enhancing the learning experience. ChatGPT became my virtual companion, a tool that encouraged exploration and fostered deeper understanding. Engaging in interactive discussions, posing complex questions, and receiving thoughtful responses was akin to having a personal tutor, guiding me through the labyrinth of knowledge.

Incorporating generative AI into education doesn’t diminish the importance of individual effort. Instead, it transforms learning into a collaborative journey, blurring the lines between independent exploration and AI assistance (LinkedIn, 2023). It challenges us not to view it as a threat but as a catalyst, propelling us toward a more profound educational experience.

As we navigate this transformative wave, let’s embrace generative AI as a partner in our educational endeavours. It’s not merely a tool; it’s an opportunity for growth, a gateway to a world where understanding, critical thinking, and creativity blend seamlessly. Like the calculators of the past, it’s not the tool itself but the wisdom of its user that defines its impact. Let’s harness this technology to elevate our learning experiences, making education a thrilling voyage into uncharted intellectual territories. What do you think?

LinkedIn. (2023). Generative AI: A Powerful Tool, Not a Substitute. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/generative-ai-powerful-tool-substitute-connie-warren-m-ed-/ 

Jones, S. (2023). Generative AI is not a calculator. Medium. https://blog.metamirror.io/us-v-eugenerative-ai-is-not-a-calculator-6ef6e0fdc763 

Please rate this

Using AI is not cheating, or is it?

18

September

2023

No ratings yet.

AI-assisted cheating, academic integrity and dishonesty – some challenges that universities have been coping with since the release of ChatGPT. Since the introduction of ChatGPT, many students including myself are using or have used ChatGPT. From my experience, it has made many tasks more efficient such as assignments. However why does it feel like a bit of cheating (depending on how generative AI is used).

Why is it not cheating? Well, generative AI is not solely used for generating text, also filtering, improving and correcting existing or self-written texts (Vázquez-Cano et al., 2023). So, it can be seen as a helpful tool that is widely accessible on the internet similarly to search engines. In addition, it could help students in term of managing time, anxiety and stress from the overpowering assignments and ultimately improving the efficiency and effectiveness (Bin-Nashwan et al., 2023). For instance, spending less time looking for suitable sources and allocating the saved time towards reviewing and analysing.

Why is it cheating? Some academicians believe that using generative AI is the same plagiarism in terms of ethics (Bin-Nashwan et al., 2023). It might restrict the potential improvement of skills of students (Ali, 2023) similarly to cheating. Currently, different versions of ChatGPT are available which are not accessible for every use and a more advanced version might put students without access at a disadvantage (Cotton et al., 2023). Especially when it is said that peers using ChatGPT receive better grades compared to student not using any generative AI tools(Vázquez-Cano et al., 2023). As much as ChatGPT creates advantages, it can also increase the discrimination between students with or without access and willing or not willing to use. Even some students avoid using ChatGPT to avoid receiving cheating accusations and concerns about reliability (Vázquez-Cano et al., 2023). It is claimed that students with higher academic integrity use ChatGPT less in their assignments (Bin-Nashwan et al., 2023).

Research show not all academicians think that using AI is cheating, what do you think?

Let me know your thoughts on this topic in the comments below!

In my next post I will touch upon whether we should ban ChatGPT, so stay tuned!

REFERENCES

Ali, F., & ChatGPT OpenAI. (2023). Let the devil speak for itself: Should ChatGPT be allowed or banned in hospitality and tourism schools? Journal of Global Hospitality and Tourism, 2(1), 1–6. https://www.doi.org/10.5038/2771-5957.2.1.1016

Bin-Nashwan, S.A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370

Cotton, D.R.E., Cotton, P.A., & Reuben Shipway, J. (2023). Chatting and cheating: ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Vázquez-Cano, E., Ramírez-Hurtado, J.M., Sáez-López, S.M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). ChatGPT: The Brightest student in the class. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101380

Please rate this