Record deliveries amid a global supply chain crisis: how Tesla prospered in Q3

9

October

2021

5/5 (1)

Over the last two years, the Covid-19 pandemic had a profound effect on the automobile industry, especially in regard to the microchip shortage which has had an impact on nearly every automobile producer as of late (Forbes, 2021). With an estimated cost of $210 billion in revenue for the auto industry, major producers like Toyota and Volkswagen having to cut their production by 40%, and no end in sight, it is clear that the consequences of the chip shortage are far reaching (Wayland, 2021). One automobile producer, however, has remained resilient during this crisis, and even recorded record deliveries in Q3. As others slashed production, Tesla increased their production by 20% in 2021 and was able to deliver 241,300 vehicles in Q3: a new record for the company (Wayland, 2021). How did Tesla manage to increase production while others were forced to cut production? A quick explanation below.

Modern Vehicle Architecture

When you compare Tesla to other auto giants like Daimler and Toyota, they are relatively new to the game: allowing Tesla to be more adaptable and quicker to change (Forbes, 2021). In Q1 & Q2 2021, Tesla was able to acquire different chips that would normally not work with their vehicle’s, however, due to Tesla’s advanced software engineering capabilities, they simply updated the software of their vehicles, allowing them to use different chips (Forbes, 2021). This form of adaptability not only allowed Tesla to have record deliveries, it also gave them a clear advantage over their competition. Large auto producers are still struggling to source chips and are relying on legacy chips/ systems in their vehicle’s, causing significant losses (Gartenberg, 2021).

Booming Business in China

Another reason for Tesla’s strong Q3 deliveries is their booming business in China. Nearly 40% of Tesla’s total production capacity is in China, and sales in the region have been growing exponentially (Forbes, 2021). With factories in China and powerful trade partners, Tesla holds a major advantage over its competitors in sourcing chips. Most micro-chips cars use are produced in China, however, many auto companies have little investment in China and nearly no bargaining power. Tesla on the other hand has quite a bit of bargaining power and investment in the area (Vercoe, 2021).

Future of Tesla

Tesla seems to be moving at lightspeed in terms of technological advancements and investment. In addition to this, they are planning on moving all car production from their California factory to a brand-new factory in Texas (Vercoe, 2021). Being at a clear advantage in the current chip shortage, Tesla is poised to continue being successful and could be a prime example of what competitors should be attempting to do.

Sources:

Forbes (2021) How Did Tesla Post Record Q3 Deliveries Despite The Chip Shortage? Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2021/10/08/how-did-tesla-post-record-q3-deliveries-despite-the-chip-shortage/?sh=35b907111041 [Accessed 8 October 2021].

Wayland, M., (2021) Chip shortage expected to cost auto industry $210 billion in revenue in 2021. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/23/chip-shortage-expected-to-cost-auto-industry-210-billion-in-2021.html [Accessed 8 October 2021].

Vercoe, P., (2021) Musk Says Chip and Ship Shortages Top Threats to Tesla Growth. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-10-08/musk-says-chip-and-ship-shortage-are-top-threats-to-tesla-growth [Accessed 8 October 2021].

Gartenberg, C., (2021) The chip shortage will likely get worse before it gets better. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/23/22547826/chip-shortage-cars-playstation-5-gpus-semiconductors-time-foundaries-tsmc [Accessed 8 October 2021].

Please rate this

Environmental Impact of Blockchain Technologies: What Solutions Exist?

7

October

2021

No ratings yet.

Whether people like it or not, blockchain technologies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum are here to stay (Blinder, 2018). These technologies have the potential to change global society for the better through, among other things, providing individuals in impoverished countries with access to a bank account and eliminating cross border transaction fees (Wintermeyer, 2018). But with every revolutionary technology, not everyone benefits, and with blockchain technologies, this is often the environment.

At the centre of the problem with blockchain is the unintended consequence of “mining”. Several cryptocurrencies use mining in order to produce more cryptocurrencies. A simplified definition of mining is the creation of new coins made possible by solving complex computational math problems (Frankenfield, 2021). However, in order to “mine crypto” at a profitable level, an insane amount of power is required (Blinder, 2018). To put this into perspective, blockchain technologies used more power than Denmark in 2020 (Blinder, 2018). With such intense use of power and blockchains environmental impact, public and governmental scrutiny rained down on the blockchain industry. But instead of looking for solutions, many simply opted for either heavily regulating the industry or a total ban of such technologies (Frankenfield, 2021). Nonetheless, blockchain technologies have flourished and solutions to their environmental impact have presented themselves.

Efficient Blockchain Systems

Bitcoin and Ethereum both use a “Proof of Work” (PoW) system to mine their coins. Although this system is secure, it is inefficient. Two energy efficient and secure solutions to PoW exist: Proof of Stake (PoS) and Delegated Proof of Stake (DPos) systems (Binance, 2018).

PoS systems require “validators” (PoS version of miners) to invest enough into the system called “staking” and in return, the validator is chosen via an algorithm which gives them permission to add blocks to the blockchain. This system does not require the computational power that a PoW system requires, and validators can be removed for misbehaving; keeping the system accurate and secure (Blinder, 2018).

DPoS systems are a more democratic and modern approach to PoS systems. With this system, voting privileges are allocated to cryptocurrency holders and each user has the opportunity to vote on which servers are allowed to create more blocks. This allows users to choose servers that are more efficient and less energy intensive if they wish. These servers also tend to process transactions much more effectively while using less resources (Binance, 2018).

With blockchain technologies becoming increasingly prevalent and environmental concerns more important, this industry must adapt to the changing needs of society and reduce its environmental impact. This short blog presented certain solutions to the environmental impact of blockchain, and instead of banning such revolutionary technologies, society and governments should motivate blockchain producers to be more environmentally conscious.

Sources:
Blinder, M., (2018) Making Cryptocurrency More Environmentally Sustainable. Available at: https://hbr.org/2018/11/making-cryptocurrency-more-environmentally-sustainable [Accessed 6 October 2021].

Binance Academy (2018) Delegated Proof of Stake Explained. Available at: https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/delegated-proof-of-stake-explained [Accessed 6 October 2021].

Frankenfield, J., (2021) Bitcoin Mining. Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bitcoin-mining.asp [Accessed 6 October 2021].

Wintermeyer, L., (2018} The Role of Cryptocurrencies in Future Society. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/lawrencewintermeyer/2018/10/26/the-role-of-cryptocurrencies-in-future-society/ [Accessed 6 October 2021].

Please rate this