Disintermediation vs Reintermediation: Does booking your next Trip directly from Airlines save your Money?

24

September

2017

4.95/5 (211)

 

It has been common sense for most of the people that book directly via airlines’ websites is cheaper than book the same flight through various online travel agencies (OTAs) such as Expedia, Orbitz, etc. Logically, this statement holds true because airlines do not need to pay any commissions to “middleman” (OTAs). Thus, airfares should be cheaper than those of OTAs. Now, you might think it is a good tip to help you book air tickets for your next family holiday. However, this is not always the case.

If you like travelling by air, and most importantly you have to pay the air tickets yourself, you are likely to have the same experience as I do: searching for ideal flights which fit my travelling plan best and comparing the fare among OTAs and the carrier’s website to get the most compelling one. In most of the cases, OTAs can offer the best deal.

You might be supersized by this irrational and raise a question why? This issue is also largely discussed by lots of individuals in different of platforms, ranging from social media to forums and from major online media to blogs. Indeed, the disintermediation which is known as the efforts for airlines to remove “middlemen” has been a significant trend in the air transportation industry. Compared with selling tickets to travellers via OTAs, airlines can get more money by selling the seat directly. Despite the fact that the direct presence of airlines is increasing (most of them have maintained social media accounts to publish promotions and slove travellers’ real-time problems) which pose threats to OTAs, the direct selling doesn’t replace the popularity of OTAs. In contrast, OTAs have become more and more important as they enable travellers to search all possible flights without limiting to only one airline or codeshared flights. This inherent advantage over airlines’ direct selling positions OTAs as indispensable players in the aviation industry. Therefore, The OTAs based selling model strengthens the force of the reintermediation for the industry.

Nevertheless, if you think to book the air tickets from OTAs is 100% cheaper than go directly to airlines’ websites, you are failing to the eDreams trick. To decide which platforms can truly offer you the best air prices, you need to ask yourself which services you need along with your flight. For example, most of the domestic flights in the USA would not include the checked luggage in the basic airfare. If you book directly with the airline, you have an option to add the additional check-in luggage for the reduced price. Whereas, this will not apply to most of OTAs, meaning that you can only pay the check-in luggage at the check-in counter, which means the price you paid for the language is doubled than the regular one, resulting in the higher airfare in total. Hence, one important factor we are talking about here is that when you are not sure which platforms to book your flights, the answer depends on your travelling demands: if you want just to fly “light” with the carried- on cabin luggage only, go for OTAs, otherwise, go directly.

From my point of view, the travelling industry has to be experiencing both the disintermediation and reintermediation in the foreseeable long term. On the one hand, airlines are trying to maximise profits by selling seats directly. Airfares are more much transparent and clear than those list by OTAs. The booking class can be more easily found by frequent flyers who need to make better “miles” decisions. Also, the prompt services are available if you have booked their flights directly. OTAs, on the other hand, feature unique characteristics which are impossible for airlines to imitate.

Source:

Should You Book Airline Tickets Through An Online Travel Agency?

https://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g1-i10702-k10159077-Why_I_buy_from_OTA-Air_Travel.html

 

Please rate this

Why iPhones again? The time for Apple to rethink.

13

September

2017

4.93/5 (320)

I think most of you have noticed that new iPhones are coming by this winner. Thanks to Sanne’s reminder (because I saw her post yesterday), I watched the annual event yesterday. Since I am not a fan of Apple (I am using OnePlus three anyway), it has been my first time to follow this event which might be a big day for most of Apple fans.

Actually, I googled “iPhone 8 and iPhone X” before the event started, tons of results with fancy titles were generated. All of them discussed the projected selling prices and associated times; however, two pages attracted my attention.

The first was doubting if new iPhone Series would be successful in Chinese market due to its premium pricing. I wholeheartedly agree with augmentations proposed. The astonishing prices charged for these phones particularly for iPhone X will render the majority non-core customers to other substitutes. As techniques for mobile phones tend to be matured these days, technical differentiation for mobile incumbents appears to be increasingly difficult. I would never be supervised if any phones feature dual lenses today, but this was not a case before Huawei released P9 at 2016. Besides, many Chinese mobile producers such as Huawei, Xiaomi, and other startups are offering mobile phones with similar technologies but much less money, so If you are not an Apple fan and you are not an active member of Apple ecosystem, here comes to a question: why not stick to Apple?

Another interesting journal came from World News, titling “How people in Netherlands get the new iPhone 7 for only 1 €”. Wait for a second, one Euro for iPhone 7? That is true, and this campaign is exclusive for Dutch market and still available until the moment I am typing. Apple lost nearly 35% market shares during last year in the Dutch mobile market. This dramatic and catastrophic drop has forced Apple to think differently- one Euro to most of us means just a bus or tram ticket, but the logic behind is that Apple wants to steal customers and lead them to the Apple ecosystem through this free trial (almost). Once, these customers have integrated and be locked to the entire system to some degree; it is not easy for them to give up any products from Apple. Rising switching costs indeed can prevent existing customers to “battery” the Apple brand in the short run, but, in the long term, this is not an efficient method, as every competitor is doing the same at the same time. Google is updating its synchronisation functions every day, and Apple is actually not alone! On the other hand, this kind of trial is not feasible to implement at a large scale. The associated costs must outweigh the gains between certain point. Perhaps, that’s the reason why the “1 Euro for Ipnone 7” campaign is only alive in the Netherlands.

Nevertheless, it is no doubt that Apple has done a quite good job in building its ecosystem. The connection of multiple Apple deceives, like iPhones, Ipads, Macs, Apple Watches, and even Apple TVs, and shared data among these platforms redefine the way of people’s daily life. Apple indeed has played pioneer role and disrupted the entire mobile industry during the “Jobs era”. However, with the Androids penetrating, the first mover privilege and advantages are increasingly getting blurring.

All in all, the mobile phone market has become more diversified, and many new entries have shared the big pie. If Apple doesn’t rethink its business model particularly pricing strategies, it would be expected that its premium strategy will not work and its market share will go down steadily. Perhaps, there is a new ear for mobile phones industry. However, there would not be only one big winner in the coming years.

Sources:
“Why iPhone X Isn’t The Answer To Apple’s China Problem”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ywang/2017/09/12/why-iphone-x-isnt-the-answer-to-apples-china-problem/#1e58a36110a2;

“How people in Netherlands get the new iPhone 7 for only 1 €”
http://world-news.site/iphone7/?ref=uprealtime.com&action=view&encrypt=yWksULp9hCJmAD4NwoPBW98nYLxGvyVxceVNK7dsD3IFD4&c=20486&utm_source=revc&utm_medium=cpa&utm_campaign=v2i&site=WEBtopic_16285_2257596_editorial_news

Please rate this