Smart Glasses: Convenience or Necessity?

5

October

2025

No ratings yet.

I’ve always been a tech-heavy user. Ever since primary school, I gave up taking notes on paper, everything I learned was through technology. My backpack, once packed with textbooks, gradually became lighter as the years passed, replaced by different devices. So naturally, I’ve become more and more detached from using papers and pens. In the past few year, I’ve been buying or trying out different innovative technologies, until recently, I got the chance to try on the Xiaomi Smart Audio Glasses.

The integrated features honestly surprised me: real-time recording, instant translation, scanning QR codes for payments (a huge convenience in China). Yet, one question immediately popped into my mind: why do I need smart glasses in the first place?

In class, we discussed how VR and AR are transforming industries. For example, in aviation, engineers are already using VR to detect errors and damages on aircraft components, or to simulate and describe objectives in training.

But for an everyday user like me, who doesn’t work in fields requiring heavy inspection, it’s harder to see the necessity. Sure, the features are fun and convenient. But they still feel more like an extra gadget than a must-have tool, unlike smartphones, which have become essential. Therefore, it made me wonder: what would it take for smart glasses to truly become indispensable?

A Different Perspective: Helping the Visually Impaired

That’s when I came across a YouTube channel run by a visually impaired content creator. She shared how Meta glasses had genuinely helped her, features like Aira Talk, Meta AI real-time answers, text translation, and image analysis all provided her with new independence.

It was truly insipiring. While I had been seeing smart glasses as the lens of convenience, for her they were a life changing tool. But even she admitted the current technology isn’t perfect. Limited battery life and difficulty prompting the AI make it unreliable. And from my perspective, I don’t think companies have invested heavily enough into making these glasses truly accessible for the blind.

Where Smart Glasses Could Go

Smart glasses today sit in an awkward middle ground. For tech lovers like me, they’re cool, but not essential. For industries, they’re powerful but niche. For the blind, they hold massive potential, but haven’t yet lived up to it.

For instance, in China, I often see how difficult daily navigation can be for blind people. The pathways built for them are often blocked by parked vehicles or street vendors, making it nearly impossible to walk safely with just a cane.

This made me think: what if smart glasses could integrate real-time navigation for the blind? With faster AI response times, improved battery life and accuracy, they could guide visually impaired people around obstacles in real life, not just describe text or translate signs. That would turn smart glasses into something far beyond a fancy gadget, they could become a necessity that truly changes lives. Thus, maybe the real breakthrough for smart glasses won’t come from adding more “convenience” features for the average consumer. Instead, it might come from redesigning or improving them as tools for accessibility, giving independence and freedom to people who need it most.

Please rate this

Who Will Own TikTok? What the U.S.–China Deal Teaches Us About Platforms and Competition

18

September

2025

5/5 (1)

Context

Back in 2020, President Donald Trump announced the plans to ban TikTok in the United States. At the same time, the justification was national security concerns over the potential access of data by the Chinese government through TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance. The ban was never materialized, but it marked the first moment when a social media app became the center of a geographical standoff. Fast forward to today, with Trump now back in power, he is once again pushing for a “solution”. This time, according to CNN News, the proposed deal with Chinese President Xi is that the majority of the shares would be transferred to the American investors, like Oracle, while ByteDance would only retain a minority stake. The arrangement is meant to resolve concerns without killing the app that has 139 million active American users (Castmagic, 2025)

But, as U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed this week, China was clearly not in favor of the “deal” and resisted giving up control of such a valuable platform. According to Bessent:

“What turned the tide was a call that Ambassador Jamieson Greer and I had with President Trump the night after the first day of negotiations, and President Trump made it clear that he would be willing to let TikTok go dark,” Bessent told CNBC on Tuesday.

In other words, the threat of a complete shutdown forced China back to the table and created a path for the current ownership deal, which is going to be announced in the coming weeks.

Comparison with TikTok vs. Kwai

This global drama reminds me of the case we studied in class about Douyin (Chinese TikTok) versus Kuaishou (Kwai) in China. Both platforms benefited from strong network effects: more content creators attracting more viewers, which attracted even more creators, reinforcing a positive feedback loop. But the competition also showed how differentiation matters. TikTok is relying on its recommendation algorithm and global expansion, while Kwai has built more community-driven interactions and is turning its focus to lower-tier Chinese regions. That rivalry was shaped by market forces and strategy. In the U.S., TikTok’s rivalry is not with another substitute app, instead, it is with the government itself. Here, geopolitics has become the real “competitor” reshaping the platform’s future.

Further Discussion

My personal opinion regarding this geopolitical tension between China and US is balanced. While the new deal may reduce the immediate tensions, it does not fully solve the deeper issue below the surface. The algorithm that drives TikTok’s content is still developing in China and liscensed out, which means concerns about influence and data insecurity won’t simply vanish in America or any parts of the world. Meanwhile, splitting ownership or separating TikTok and Douyin could reduce TikTok’s innovation cycle since ByteDance is no longer involved or barely involved, this could give more rooms for rivals to grow and expand.

What I found most intriguing is whether this U.S.-China split will create a two-parallel TikTok and Douyin world, similar to how TikTok and Kwai co-exist in China. Could the US-owned TikTok evolve differently from Douyin in China, with separate features, rules, and communities? Or will this separation weaken TikTok’s vision, strategies, reputation, network effects, and so on until the point where potential competitors (e.g. RedNotes) finally catch up and replace it?

References

Castmagic. (2025). TikTok Users by Country in 2025: Global Stats & Rankings. Castmagic.io. https://www.castmagic.io/post/tiktok-usage-by-country#which-country-has-the-most-tiktok-users

Treene, A., & Goldman, D. (2025, September 16). We now know who the new owners of TikTok will be – if Trump gets his deal done with Xi. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/16/tech/tiktok-ban-extension-trump

Imran Rahman-Jones. (2025b, September 16). TikTok to stay in the US as Donald Trump says deal is done. BBC. http://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7847q9xvwgo

Please rate this