ChatGPT as a free tutor, not a cheating a tool 

10

October

2024

5/5 (1)

I am really annoyed when I hear other people portraying ChatGPT merely as a cheating tool for lazy students, because it is such an unfair and simply false description of what it really is. What ChatGPT has been for me over the past 2 years is first and foremost a digital tutor. I cannot possibly count the number of instances when this incredible GenAI app helped me understand a certain theory when the definition presented in a class was not enough. ChatGPT has proved to be my empowering tutor also whenever I was preparing for exams and needed to test my knowledge. By prompting the chat to ask me questions related to the material, I was leveraging the technology to learn more efficiently, not to just learn less in overall, as some argue. I have always been treating the OpenAI’s application as a tool which can help me process and acquire new knowledge, by generating customized explanations of complex problems, just like real tutors do. I never use it to simply write things for me, as I see value in knowing how to independently formulate and express my ideas. 

However, it is true that my approach to ChatGPT is not universal. Many students take advantage of this and other generative AI applications to free themselves from time consuming writing assignments and gain more leisure time. Thus, the reality is that whether ChatGPT will be used as an empowering tutor or a cheating tool which hinders development of one’s academic skills, depends solely on the user’s intentions. Having said that, I believe that the chat’s adversaries should focus on changing the student’s approach to the system, rather than just try to kill it which I think cannot be done. The generative AI, including ChatGPT is here to stay. Forcing students to abandon it can lead to only counterproductive results. What we can do is to teach people how to use it wisely. 

Please rate this

Author: Maciej Wiecko

BIM student from Poland, 23 yo.

Is ChatGPT safe?

16

September

2024

No ratings yet.

With its latest o1 model released, OpenAI developers claim that the ChatGPT is now able to do human like reasoning and solve problems at the level of PhD physics’ courses. However, it may also imply a greater than ever risk of undesired misuse cases of generative AI for example, to create biological weapons. As the iconic saying goes: with great power comes great responsibility. But, does it really?

On last Thursday (September 12th) Sam Altman’s firm announced the launch of a new AI model, backing their ChatGPT search tool, called o1. The firm declared that the model significantly outperformed previous models, such as GPT-4o in for example, solving the International Mathematics Olympiad exam, where it achieved a score of 83 per cent, compared to 13 per cent of its predecessor.

Moreover, many users have already praised online the new model for its priorly unmet level of problem solving and the ability to write high end code.

Although, the further development of the AI technology is something which we all applaud and cheer for, we shall not forget about the associated risks that come with it.

According to OpenAI’s engineers the o1 model was deemed as bearing “medium risk” when tested for threats pertaining biological, chemical, radiological and nuclear weapons. It is the highest risk level that OpenAI has ever given for its models. One of the firm’s employees pointed out that their latest genAI solution may improve the ability of expert agents to create bioweapons.

When facing such serious potential danger, the issue of AI regulation is being brought up again by many. While, the general public (now, even in the EU) agrees that the safety policies should be implemented with caution, so that the AI technology development would not be suppressed too much, it has zero trust in big tech companies’ self-regulation.

Therefore, the question remains whether the governments can work out a satisfying compromise solution, which would increase the safety of us all, and at the same time preserve the current speed of AI technological advancements.

References:

  1. https://www.ft.com/content/af6b293c-113d-4aac-b9d8-d4f65596f645
  2. https://www.ft.com/content/37ba7236-2a64-4807-b1e1-7e21ee7d0914

Please rate this

Author: Maciej Wiecko

BIM student from Poland, 23 yo.