Personalization with Purpose: Zalando’s Digital Stylist and the Future of Conscious Shopping

17

October

2025

No ratings yet.

Team 44: Aysenaz Cimsit (633875); Marianna Tabaczyk (647650); Sasha Mballa Ambani Ledji (777624); Sem Gelderblom (647994)

Online shopping marketplaces are responsible for the unsustainable practices of fashion consumption that contribute to the deterioration of environmental conditions globally. As a fashion marketplace, Zalando has the opportunity to reduce over consumption by leveraging a virtual try-on (VTO) tool to reduce item returns. Zalando itself indicates that about 50% of ordered items are returned (Zalando, 2022). Flexible return policies also encourage buyers to shop more, and accelerate supply chain activities that worsen environmental conditions (Velazquez & Chankov, 2019). It can thus be explored how Zalando can be positioned as a leader in the sustainable consumption of fashion. The VTO tool, Digital Stylist, creates a personalised experience for buyers to visualise digitally how their chosen items would look on them before purchase. The gap of doubt is therefore minimised, and subsequently return rates are reduced and customer satisfaction is improved. The pilot project with Zalando aims to promote an IT-driven change that implements AI and machine learning to transform the impersonal buying experience of online shoppers. In effect, Zalando management gained insights on buying behaviour and customer satisfaction to improve their competitiveness in the market. 

Current VTO tools are generic and use an avatar to model items on a body. The Digital Stylist prototype initially prompts users to upload a full body image, their body measurements, and their selected items. Using language models and generative models, the tool produces a render of the user wearing their selected items. An AI assistant additionally serves as an online personal stylist to support the interactivity of the tool. Two versions of the tool are created to serve audiences with a significant difference in digital literacy and shopping habits. The AR-ready version gives customers the ability to view how clothing behaves and fits from multiple angles. The light version is optimised for speed by providing lower quality outfit previews directly on uploaded 2D photos of the individual. At the pilot testing phase of the launch, the prototype will be limited in functionality and capacity to allow for multiple testing iterations. The next phase of the product launch focuses on the tool at scale, which requires an in-house development of the tool to increase its capacity and processing power. The two phases are guided by the following key metrics; an 8% decrease in return rates, 15% increase in conversion rates, and a 10 point increase in Zalando’s Net Promoter Score. The metrics not only evaluate the economic effect, but also position Zalando as a leader for responsible consumption and production in the fashion industry.

The success of the launch requires management to effectively create alignment between teams to manage the potential areas of risk; security of personal data, public backlash on image alteration, and the complexity of the tool in comparison to competitors. Management must require research to be conducted on the potential risks, and for alignment to exist between the required elements of the product and customer needs. 

The Digital stylist will not only allow Zalando to strengthen their competitive position through innovation, it will also help the world as a whole by contributing to lowering world wide pollution on a planet that is in desperate need of help.

References:

Velazquez, R., & Chankov, S. M. (2019, December 1). Environmental Impact of Last Mile Deliveries and Returns in Fashion E-Commerce: A Cross-Case Analysis of Six Retailers. IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978705

Zalando. (2022). Returns at Zalando. Zalando Corporate Website. https://corporate.zalando.com/en/about-us/what-we-do/returns-zalando

Please rate this

Not Just Code, But Guidance: What AI Taught Me About Learning

1

October

2025

No ratings yet.

I have classes that require me to use Python and R programming. I expected
countless hours of going through textbooks and tutorials, but I decided to use generative AI
(primarily ChatGPT) to help me learn and improve my programming skills. This learning
process not only helped me with my coding, but I also figured out how to effectively learn
with AI.

At first, I was struggling; I was putting in exercises or vague prompts, and the AI generated
lines of code that I did not understand. I realized that it was not about understanding code
but about understanding how to ask the right questions to get answers tailored to my
needs. I decided to experiment with this, and I treated the AI not like a search engine, but
like an online tutor. The ‘study and learn’ mode on ChatGPT helped a lot. I provided the AI
with a coding task, and it responded with a detailed guide: from organizing to creating the
code and then improving it. The positive aspect was the momentum—I didn’t get stuck.
However, the downside was that if I followed every step blindly, I learned less. What helped
me was changing the AI to “explain-first” mode: I requested the reason behind each step, a
simple example, and a brief self-assessment I could perform before proceeding further
with the coding content I had provided. If I encountered an error, I requested to identify the
cause instead of just asking for the correct solution. That transformed the tutorial from a
solution guide into genuine teaching.

Reflecting on my experience with improving my coding skills with generative AI, I believe
that there are both promises and limits. On the one hand, it offers personalized learning
and support tailored to your needs and at any time, but on the other hand, it promotes
passive learning. I think there needs to be a balance: anyone using generative AI should
experiment with how it can support their work effectively, while still making sure they
remain in control of the process. If I could change anything in these tools, such as the
‘Study and Learn’ ChatGPT, I would make them function more like a teacher: make it ask
questions to assess skill levels, clarify the solutions, and give additional exercises to check
if the content is understood. By using generative AI in that way, for educational purposes, it
does not eliminate the process of learning; in fact, it enhances it.

Please rate this

From Chatbots to CEOs: How Far Can GenAI Go?

18

September

2025

5/5 (3)

When chatbots such as ChatGPT emerged, they were regarded as novelties: entertaining tools for trivia, composing brief texts, or generating ideas. Within just a few years, Generative AI (GenAI) has entered strategic areas — creating legal documents, developing marketing campaigns, predicting trends, and even crafting new products. The focus is changing from what GenAI is capable of to what its limits might be. Might we eventually witness an AI serving as a CEO?

A few companies are currently trying out new methods. In 2022, Chinese tech company NetDragon Websoft gained attention for naming an AI-driven virtual humanoid, “Ms. Tang Yu,” as the CEO of one of its subsidiaries. The organization stated that the AI would enhance operational efficiency and deliver impartial decision-making (Business Insider, 2022). Though mainly symbolic, this action underscores how AI is starting to be placed in roles resembling leadership.

Researchers indicate that AI is subtly reshaping leadership dynamics. A report from Capgemini (2023) states that executives are increasingly depending on GenAI for decision-making assistance, trend analysis, and performance tracking. The issue arises when innovation frequently outpaces governance, resulting in a “responsibility gap” where ethical supervision fails to keep up with technological implementation (NTT DATA, 2025).

There are also dangers to human motivation. A study from Harvard Business Review (2025) discovered that although GenAI enhances short-term productivity, it might diminish intrinsic motivation if employees feel excluded by algorithms. This implies that an “AI supervisor” may enhance workflow efficiency but may have difficulty in inspiring, empathizing, or motivating — traits crucial to human leadership.

What might a CEO powered by AI resemble? In my opinion, it is probable that it won’t be an independent machine “operating” a business but rather a combined system: humans offering vision, ethical guidance, and emotional insight, while AI manages data-focused optimization and quick decision assistance. Ultimately, regardless of the emergence of a formal “AI CEO,” the path is evident: GenAI is infiltrating more complex roles that influence strategy, culture, and innovation. The real challenge will be if leaders can incorporate AI as a collaborator instead of a substitute, guaranteeing that efficiency does not sacrifice accountability, trust, and human relationships.

References

Business Insider. (2022). A Chinese gaming firm appoints AI-powered CEO. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com

Capgemini. (2023). Generative AI in leadership. Retrieved from https://www.capgemini.com

Harvard Business Review. (2025). GenAI makes people more productive — and less motivated. Retrieved from https://hbr.org

NTT DATA. (2025). AI responsibility crisis: Why executive leadership must act now. Retrieved from https://us.nttdata.com

Please rate this