This blog, I will dive further into the impact generative AI has on media and if it will change how we perceive media.
During the last few months, I started to notice that people on LinkedIn use the same format over and over again. This is the format I perceived: people start of with a catchphrase and one or more emojis to tell you what the article is about and the rest of the post they start of each different part with a relevant emoji. Here is an example:
Figure 1, LinkedIn post
In light of my first blog, I decided to further dive into this. My first step of investigation was to ask ChatGPT to write me a LinkedIn post. Given the fact that ChatGPT is currently up to date, I should receive a post in this same format if this style of posting is indeed common on LinkedIn. And what do you know, when I asked ChatGPT to write a LinkedIn post a format that is popular in 2023, I got exactly the same result as I was seeing on LinkedIn.
In light of this confirmation, I started to wonder: does my perception of the value of LinkedIn post change if I think it is likely that they are written with the help of ChatGPT or another Gen AI? Personally, I became a bit more skeptical of LinkedIn posts due to this discovery. I think at the core of this lies the question:
Once you are unsure whether media is written by a person or AI, what does this do to the value of the media?
So, what do you think? Do you think your perception of media changes if you know or suspect it is written by AI?
References
Will AI-generated images create a new crisis for fact-checkers? Experts are not so sure. (z.d.). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/will-ai-generated-images-create-new-crisis-fact-checkers-experts-are-not-so-sure