The Disruptive Potential in the Payments Industry

12

October

2017

5/5 (1)

Although fintech companies – generally small, technology enabled new entrants – have succeeded in changing the way financial services are structured, provisioned and consumed, they failed to establish a new ecosystem and infrastructure, besides severely underestimating customer switching costs. Instead of overtaking incumbents as the new dominant players in the industry, fintech startups seek strategic alliances with powerful, established firms who may deploy new capabilities through acquisition and partnership.

In 2015 the major disruptive trends were mobile payments (e.g. Apple Pay [2014], Samsung Pay [2015], Android Pay [2015]), alternative payment rails (e.g. Ripple and blockchain) and seamless/frictionless payment (e.g. Uber) that increased pressure on margins whereas intra-industry competition intensified and the local regulatory environment shifted. Although payments have continued the migration to digital channels while the popularity of online and mobile purchases grew driven by the ability to shop 24/7, compare prices as well as lower price levels in general (KPMG, 2017), customer acceptance of nontraditional payment schemes remains insignificant since innovative solutions have not yet exceeded the functionality of pre-existing technologies.

The World Economic Forum identified the following key uncertainties regarding the future of the payments industry:

  • Whether the future of payments diverge into two worlds, retail and online respectively?
  • Who is best positioned to benefit from the monetization of payment data?
  • Will PSD2[1] successfully create new payments value in Europe?
  • Will mobile payments ever capture a major share of retail payments in card based countries?
  • What will the first national digital currency look like, and how far it is?

Depending on the resolution of these questions, three scenarios are likely to play out:

  1. Loss Leader: As incumbent credit card issuer revenues decline due to governments limiting interchange rates, furthermore real-time payment systems become widely deployed and alternatives to revolving credit stay available to most customers, market leaders may seize the chance to create new revenue streams through data monetization (payments as information) or use payments to lock customers into an ecosystem.
  2. Two Ecosystems Post-PSD2: Imminent regulatory standardization forces incumbent players to adopt simple, secure and effective APIs (application programming interface) open to third party vendors which facilitate collaboration with stakeholders and enables seamless – customer – data sharing. By implementing widespread technology solutions that are compatible with bank APIs, online retailers become capable of diverting traffic away from the traditional card-based infrastructure. Subsequently, because point-of-sale behaviors lag behind in adaptation, we can expect two distinct, online (collaborative banking platforms) and retail payments ecosystems to emerge.
  3. Increasing Fragmentation: As a result of merchants, banks and fintech companies’ efforts to differentiate their services, the payments customer experience will fragment whereas customized payment solutions combined with loyalty/reward schemes are developed, then released. Considering the solutions are based on credit card usage, customers can easily manage the different payment mobile applications and tools in order to maximize their utility (i.e. rewards). In this scenario, only banks have insight on customer’s spending patterns, which data they can monetize.

Based on the current market trends, which scenario do you think is more likely?

Source

Accenture (2016). Seizing the Opportunities Unlocked by the EU’s Revised Payment Services Directive. Available at: https://www.accenture.com/t20160831T035645Z__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/PDF-19/Accenture-Banking-Opportunities-EU-PSD2-v2.pdf#zoom=50 (Accessed 11 Oct. 2017).

Capgemini (2017). Financial Services Analysis – Banks Strategic Response To Structural Changes. Available at: https://www.worldpaymentsreport.com/The-New-Payments-Ecosystem#key-enablers-of-thenew-payments-ecosystem (Accessed 12 Oct. 2017).

Capgemini (2017). Financial Services Analysis – Key Enablers of the New Payments Ecosystem. Available at: https://www.worldpaymentsreport.com/The-New-Payments-Ecosystem (Accessed 12 Oct. 2017).

KPMG (2017). The Truth About Online Consumers – 2017 Global Online Consumer Report. Available at: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/01/the-truth-about-online-consumers.pdf (Accessed 11 Oct. 2017).

World Economic Forum (2017). Beyond Fintech: How the successes and failures of new entrants are reshaping the financial system. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/beyond-fintech-a-pragmatic-assessment-of-disruptive-potential-in-financial-services (Accessed 11 Oct. 2017).

 

[1] Payment Services Directive 2 (Directive 2015/2366/EU): “A data and technology-driven directive that aims to drive increased competition, innovation and transparency across the European payments market, while also enhancing the security of Internet payments and account access.” Banks are required to grant access to third party providers to a customer’s online account/payment services in a regulated and secure way. (Accenture, 2016)

Please rate this

Technology of the Week – The Book Publishing Industry

21

September

2017

5/5 (4)

Amazon, a well-known USA based e-commerce and cloud computing company, was founded by Jeff Bezos in 1994. Starting as an online bookstore, it later successfully transformed into a full-fledged retailer (Hartmans, 2017). Nevertheless the expansion, in 2014 books still accounted for 65% of Amazon’s total online sales in the US market, nearly half of which were e-books, generating $75 billion revenue (Bercovici, 2017). By 2016, the worldwide sales of e-books from Amazon further increased by 4% (Friedman, 2017).

Kindle, one of Amazon’s most innovative products enables users to browse, buy, download, and read e-books, newspapers, magazines and other digital media via wireless connection to the Kindle Store (launched in January 2017), was first introduced to the market in 2007. Nowadays, an increasing number of customers favors Kindle over physical books, not only because e-books are readily accessible and highly portable, but also because of the much cheaper subscription-based plans that provide access to thousands of books for a monthly fee.

Understandably, the introduction of ebooks and e-readers brought about significant changes in the book publishing industry:

  1. The emergence of self-publishing (the publication of any media without an established publisher) enables authors to oversee the entire publishing process;
  2. The shifting behavioral patterns of readers while e-reader devices become more affordable;
  3. The reduction of printing, inventory and distribution costs;
  4. The declining number of independent stores as a result of online bookselling.

Due to the digital nature of ebooks, distribution and reproduction costs are negligible. However, e-books have yielded the same profit percentage as print book does (Wilson, 2014). Considering readers’ perspectives, ebooks are superior to print books in terms of portability, price and availability (i.e. many titles are free). Ultimately, ebook lies at the intersection of appropriate technology, content, economic viability and user convenience, all which factors kicked off the industry disruption.

Furthermore, ebooks also prove to be a low-risk format for self-publishing since fixed costs are low, there is no need for an inventory, and responding to market demand is relatively easy. Although electronic publishers are unable to provide the promotion which is customary in traditional publishing, they can increase the share of revenues available for author royalties (Wilson, 2014) besides granting a chance for clear access to potential readers. After all, “e-books and e-readers are complementary products in a market that connects authors to readers.” (Gilbert, 2015)

Overall, digitalization does have a remarkable impact on the future of book publishing industry. The trend of self-publishing will continue to gain strength with small presses, independent authors and Amazon imprints accounting for over 50% of market share, further bolstered by shifting reader perceptions, the dismissal of traditional publishing products (Kizer, 2017). Additionally, behavioral changes like how and when people listen to content, will boost the popularity of audiobooks, the fastest growing format in the current market (Association of American Publishers, 2016). Moreover, established publishers must rise to the challenge raised by subscription-based models (e.g. Kindle Unlimited) and increased competition in ancillary services (i.e. marketing) particularly within the indie community.

Brought to you by Team 12 (G. Li, M.Q. Nguyen, T.T.A. Nguyen and Y. Wang)

Please visit our video: https://youtu.be/3PFyzx5OdVk


Sources:

Please rate this

An On-Going Battle: Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity

14

September

2017

4.5/5 (2)

Whether we are aware or not, cyber-attacks are increasingly part of our daily lives, with global, headline-grabbing ransomware attacks which utilized ‘WannaCry’ (May 2017) and ‘Petya’ (June 2017) being only the tip of the iceberg. Just for last month Symantec reported the highest global spam rate (55.3 percent) since March 2015, besides elevated web attack activity and increased email malware rate. In this situation, turning to artificial intelligence seems like a rational next step to enhance cybersecurity but it is actually far from the perfect solution.

The heart of the problem lies in the fact that artificial intelligence (AI) can be wielded by both the cyber attackers and everyone else on the other team. Hence, while IT professionals use AI to automate and augment manual tasks (e.g. screen security incident logs), analyse data as well as look for anomalies which may hint at a threat, hackers could apply the same technology to process stolen consumer big data, enabling them to quickly identify and target the next victims. Without doubt, cyber criminals are turning machine learning (ML) to their advantage, whereas security experts wrestle with the drawbacks of current solutions (e.g. ML algorithms might have difficulties when handling data with many overlapping point or abstract and unclear data points.)

Another aspect of the situation is that most AI systems require human expertise, at the very least to manage exceptions which leads us to the next obstacle: the global shortage of cybersecurity professionals. Frost & Sullivan forecasted more than 1.5 million unfilled positions in the field by 2020, despite rising salaries, increased budgets, high job satisfaction rates and low changes in employment status. Clearly, organisations must reconsider their workforce strategy, review their talent management practices and adjust their recruiting and hiring efforts accordingly.

Nonetheless, the outlook of AI in cybersecurity is bright, considering the advancement in unsupervised learning and continuous retaining. Additionally, smart technologies such as biometric authentication and user behaviour analysis promise to cover a broad set of attack vectors, further enhancing AI-powered threat detection and mitigation.


Sources:
Symantec Security Response: Monthly Threat Report, https://www.symantec.com/security_response/publications/monthlythreatreport.jsp (Accessed: 2017/09/13)

Juliette Rizkallah: Is Cybersecurity A Second Coming For AI? https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2017/05/23/is-cybersecurity-a-second-coming-for-ai/#617606b7c400 (Accessed: 2017/09/13)

Simon Crosby: Separating Fact From Fiction: The Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Cybersecurity, https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2017/08/21/separating-fact-from-fiction-the-role-of-artificial-intelligence-in-cybersecurity/3/#572c3c392516 (Accessed: 2017/09/13)

Julie Peeler:  Study: Workforce Shortfall Due To Hiring Difficulties Despite Rising Salaries, Increased Budgets And High Job Satisfaction Rate,
http://blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/2015/04/isc-study-workforce-shortfall-due-to-hiring-difficulties-despite-rising-salaries-increased-budgets-a.html (Accessed: 2017/09/13)

Please rate this