E-Estonia: Are You Already An E-Resident?

12

October

2016

No ratings yet.

Estonia, a small country with only 1,3 billion inhabitants, located just underneath the Baltic Sea. There, accompanied by Finland, Lithuania and Russia, it disruptively rises as a leading country in information management. You probably did not expect e-Estonia to be so disruptive, and you probably do not even know more about Estonia than their annual Eurovision Song Contest participants. Therefore, I will give you a little introduction.

In 1991, the country got independent from Russia. During that time, only half of the inhabitants got a phone line. In 1997, 97% of the schools were online. Three years after, the cabinet meeting in Estonia went paperless. Half a decade after that, e-voting was introduced. In 2012 the country was almost fully covered on fiber network.  Also, 94% of the country’s tax returns were being made online. This made is possible for citizens to specify in their tax in an average time of only 5 minutes, since most parts were already filled in completely by the link between the tax office and the local banks.

In the end of 2014, Estonia introduced the concept of e-Residency as the first country in the world. As of beginning of May the next year, more than 10K people (from over 127 countries like Finland, Russia, and the Netherlands) had applied for e-residency. Today, every task of the government that can be done digitally, is being done digitally (http://www.zdnet.com/article/post-panama-papers-heres-how-estonias-e-residency-project-plans-to-head-off-banking-scandals/, 2016).

So, what is e-residency? “e-Residency offers to every world citizen a government-issued digital identity and the opportunity to run a trusted company online, unleashing the world’s entrepreneurial potential.“ (https://e-estonia.com/e-residents/about/, 2016). This means, that you do not have to live in Estonia to be an Estonian e-resident. In fact, the e-residency is a transnational digital identity available to anyone in the world interested in administering a location-independent business online. So, if you want to do business through Estonia, this can be done by becoming an e-resident. For example, because the Estonian tax is favorable (for other advantages check https://www.leapin.eu/articles/e-residency). If you become an e-resident, you get a digital ID card that contains a special chip. Using this card, you can enter Estonian public and private sector services and resources.

Since this blog is here for academic reasons, I would like to elaborate on a comparison introduced by Fletcher in the Digital Evolution Index (http://fletcher.tufts.edu/eBiz/Index, 2013). Due to the introduction of the e-Residency, Estonia is now ‘competing’ with other countries with its digital infrastructure. Fletcher has made 4 categories of states that countries are in (Figure 1). On the vertical axis, the status of the countries’ digital ecosystems are displayed. On the horizontal axis, the five-year rate of change of each country, positive or negative. The zones that are displayed are called evolution zones. Where do you think your country is placed? And where do think Estonia is placed?

Figure 1

I would like to put the focus on the Stand Out division, since these markets or countries offer a disproportionately high ROI in e-commerce. Policy and regulatory environments that promote rather than restrict the digital economy are a competitive advantage: Chile, Malaysia, and Estonia are reaping the benefits of their forward-looking governments.  However, a lack of effective institutions can deadlock the growth potential of e-commerce in some of the biggest emerging economies, including China, India, and Brazil. Therefore, the e-residency in Estonia creates growth potential for the e-commerce market, on a disruptive way.

In the figure below countries are placed in the Trajectory Chart, based on DEI data (2013). Estonia is on the Stand Out division of the graph, which is a nice sign for their economy.

Figure 2

Surprisingly (at least in my opinion) we see the Netherlands standing all alone in the Stall Out division. This means that the Dutch did well in the past, but now, they are going to lay behind. For Dutch residents and entrepreneurs, businesses, it would be beneficial that the Dutch policymakers take this seriously and make sure not to get too comfortable in this Stall Out division of the Trajectory Chart. As of this year, the Netherlands have agreed upon a project to improve their ICT. One of the companies consulting that, is the company that I work for (PBLQ). This is by the way also my source of inspiration for this blog post.

Thanks for reading,

Ruth de Vogel
388497


Nice links for more information:

http://www.zdnet.com/article/post-panama-papers-heres-how-estonias-e-residency-project-plans-to-head-off-banking-scandals/

https://e-estonia.com/e-residents/about/

https://www.leapin.eu/articles/e-residency

http://fletcher.tufts.edu/eBiz/Index

Please rate this

What information means for the public sector: from eGovernment to iGovernment.

4

October

2016

No ratings yet.

Several weeks ago, I had a training about what information management means for the public sector in the Netherlands, like the Dutch government. In this blog I want to discuss the growing importance and impact of information for governments and countries themselves in the digitizing society. An example of a leading country in information based society is Estonia. I will write my next blogpost about Estonia and their strategy on information. In the blog, I will first explain the differences between the two variants of digital goverments: the eGovernment and the ‘brand new’ iGovernment. Then, I will further elaborate on the pros and cons for the two latter types of governments. I will conclude in a forecast of what I expect governments will look like in the future. Before the training, I had actually never heard of a thing such as eGovernment. Off course, I knew that in the Netherlands we use an electronic resident number DigID to arrange stuff online, such as study financing, taxes, et cetera. But, what’s more? Is there a model behind that? I never thought about that.

The first variant of the digital governement is an eGovernment, or eGov. An eGov is an abbreviation for electronic government. This is a government which uses stand-alone applications, like a public transport ID card and an Electronic Health Record. This government thinks, discusses and handles based on those applications. This e-government mostly uses digitalization for the sake of improving their services. The European Union defines eGovernment as: “The carrying out of government business transactions electronically, usually over the Internet, but including all the related real-world processes. In our information society, customers increasingly expect government to be accessible and convenient. As customers’ expectations increase, governments must adopt eGovernment strategies”. The emergence of the eGov is highly correlated with the modernisation of the public sector. This is already on the political and policymakers’ agenda for more than two decades. The term eGovernment arose in the nineties. So, the eGov is not new at all. How come that we still don’t know it?

Next and in overlap to the eGovernment, we have the iGovernment (iGov). This is an abbreviation of information government. This government lies centrally in and uses a network of information, and uses flows of information on the back-end of all those applications that the eGov uses. This variant of digital government focusses on information flows. Numerous information flows are created by the usage of the applications coming from the eGov. In the future, other applications and devices will even further increase the amount of information flows. Think of the internet of things that can develop and send even more information continuously into the cloud that might be useful for governments too. The iGov passes boundaries of policy domains and even further. This sets some new subjects for the political agenda of a lot of countries: how do they cope with it and with the vulnerabilities arising (e.g. privacy concerns). Isn’t the eGov good enough, shouldn’t countries exploit that option first?

What do you think? Are politicians in countries aware of the existence of iGovernments? Should governments and policymakers that now focus on eGovernments, consider to quickly switch to the iGovernment model? What happens if countries fail to deal with the innumerable information flows that the digitization brings?
Let me know through commenting on this blogpost.

Thank you for reading :).


References:

WRR (2015) iGovernement [Online] http://www.wrr.nl/fileadmin/en/publicaties/PDF-samenvattingen/iGovernment.pdf

European Commission (2012) eGovernment Benchmark Report [Online] https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/sites/digital-agenda/files/eGovernment%20Benchmarking%20method%20paper%20published%20version_0.pdf

Bootcamp Information Management Course (2016) at PBLQ The Hague (www.pblq.nl)

 

 

Please rate this