I wanted to know whether generative AI could make my work faster without compromising quality. To find out, I used it for two concrete projects: preparing a podcast episode and setting up a small website for a friend.
For the podcast research, I used NotebookLM. I uploaded an outline, a transcript, and a few articles. Within minutes, I received a clear overview of the key themes, contradictions were highlighted, and I got surprisingly sharp interview questions, such as “ask for a concrete failure metric rather than just impact.” This gave structure to my preparation and made my questions more focused and relevant. I even turned the material into a short podcast episode so I could listen back later and learn the content on the go. This was perfect for a busy schedule, since I could review key ideas while commuting or doing other tasks. It felt like having a research assistant who saved me time but left the content decisions entirely up to me.
Gamma GT is what I chose for the website. Over the course of one evening, my friend and I managed to create a basic yet useful website that included a contact form. Entering the text, selecting a layout, and publishing went smoothly. Without the difficulties of a lengthy design process or the complexity of a full CMS, it was an effective method to quickly create a professional online presence.
The fact that AI eliminates the noise rather than replacing the work I do is what excites me. Structure, summarization, and simple formatting tasks that typically need time become quicker and more reliable. This provides me more energy for the tasks that require critical thought and creativity. I remain cautious, though, because AI is capable of confidently presenting false facts. Source transparency and verification are still essential.
For me, AI is not a shortcut but a tool that creates more space for better, more thoughtful work.
