The Effect of Social Media on Adolescents

2

October

2021

No ratings yet.

The fact that children use social media is not news. However, what social media does to adolescents is perhaps lesser-known to parents and those around them. Considering social media has not been around for too long, it is not absurd that the effects of social media on children and their development and health are rather foreign.

A common mentioned negative effect of social media usage by adolescents is mental health decline. Heavy usage is associated with hyperactivity, inattention, ODD, anxiety, depression symptoms (Barry et al., 2017). Besides this, the fear of missing out (FoMo) is also suffered by many adolescents, combined with feelings of loneliness. Heavy usage is even connected to deliberate self-harm and suicide in youths (Biernesser et al., 2020). Sleep disturbance and obesity are also connected to adolescent social media usage (Khajeheian et al., 2018). Moreover, research suggests that intense social media use is detrimental to the relationship between father and child, mothers and daughters, yet not between mothers and sons (Sampasa‐Kanyinga et al., 2020). Another risk for children on social media is grooming. In child grooming, an adult (predator) engages with a minor (victim) with the intent to meet in person (Cano et al., 2014). Social media usage by paedophiles is a greater societal concern (Cane et al., 2014). Tunick et al. (2011) also raise ethical concerns, such as psychologists being able to see their client’s online activities, which may cross professional lines as self-disclosure, informed consent and confidentiality are at risk. 

On the other hand, social media can also be used to promote health. Informing about diets, exercise, sex, smoking, alcohol and parenting issues (Hamm et al., 2014). Nevertheless, the positive effects of healthy food information are nullified under the constant promotion of fast food by social media influencers (Khajeheian et al., 2018). Beyens et al. (2020) argue that the effects, whether they would be beneficial or detrimental to well-being, are heavily person-specific. Thus, research, prevention and intervention should consider person-specifics.

References:

Barry, C. T., Sidoti, C. L., Briggs, S. M., Reiter, S. R., & Lindsey, R. A. (2017). Adolescent social media use and mental health from adolescent and parent perspectives. Journal of Adolescence, 61, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.08.005

Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., van Driel, I. I., Keijsers, L., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2020). The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67727-7

Biernesser, C., Sewall, C. J., Brent, D., Bear, T., Mair, C., & Trauth, J. (2020). Social media use and deliberate self-harm among youth: A systematized narrative review. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105054

Cano, A. E., Fernandez, M., & Alani, H. (2014). Detecting Child Grooming Behaviour Patterns on Social Media. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_30

Hamm, M. P., Shulhan, J., Williams, G., Milne, A., Scott, S. D., & Hartling, L. (2014). A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of social media in child health. BMC Pediatrics, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-138

Khajeheian, D., Colabi, A., Ahmad Kharman Shah, N., Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi, C., & Jenatabadi, H. (2018). Effect of Social Media on Child Obesity: Application of Structural Equation Modeling with the Taguchi Method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), 1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071343

Sampasa‐Kanyinga, H., Goldfield, G. S., Kingsbury, M., Clayborne, Z., & Colman, I. (2020). Social media use and parent–child relationship: A cross‐sectional study of adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(3), 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22293

Tunick, R. A., Mednick, L., & Conroy, C. (2011). A snapshot of child psychologists’ social media activity: Professional and ethical practice implications and recommendations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 440–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025040

Please rate this

Social media: the breeding ground for conspiracy theories

24

September

2021

No ratings yet.

It is easy to believe scientific evidence, but have you tried questioning everything around you? Conspiracy theories have been whispered through society for ages, yet believers seem more vocal in recent times. Through social media, such theories can be spread easily and quickly  (Min, 2021). Believing in conspiracy theories and falling for misinformation has been associated with social media usage by many authors (Enders et al., 2021). The so-called “echo chamber” is often blamed, as it efficiently places individuals in silos of like-minded others, purposely feeding them information that suits their ideological beliefs (Sunstein, 2017). As such, social media has shamelessly promoted conspiracies and misinformation, facilitating it to spread substantially in the process (Enders et al., 2021).

Conspiracy theories have a top-down (e.g., covid is a hoax to vaccinate everyone with 5G-chips), bottom-up (e.g., capitol riots) or event-driven shape (e.g., the moon landing)(Stuttaford, 2021). While some theories seem harmless, others have real societal impacts. The “anti-vax” movement or the storming of the U.S. capitol at the beginning of 2021 are examples of those real-life repercussions (Min, 2021). Perhaps the most troubling development is the decreasing institutional trust through active social media usage (Mari et al., 2021). However, social media alone does not appear to be capable of starting a certain belief system, there has to be a hospitable environment beforehand (Enders et al., 2021).

Epistemic (understanding and certainty), existential (control), and social needs are argued as the forces behind believing in conspiracy theories (Douglas et al., 2017, Cherry, 2020). Lower levels of education have also been related to believing in conspiracy theories (Cherry, 2020), which may stem from epistemic needs. A higher level of uncertainty avoidance, feelings of disempowerment or anxiety and vulnerable population segments are ingredients for conspiracy development or acceptance (Mari et al., 2021). Enders et al. (2021) argue that when one sees conspiracy theories in all types of events, the likelihood increases for believing, or even seeking out, dubious ideas online.

Moderating conspiracy theories is argued as a mitigation strategy for social media platforms (Min, 2021). Auto-detection through machine learning is getting more accurate every day and is employed frequently on such platforms to combat the spread of conspiracies and misinformation (Marcellino, 2021). Even though platforms pledge to improve regulation and moderation, their effectiveness is doubted as theories and misinformation continue to dominate (Grimes, 2020). Social media regulation cannot be ignored longer and might require legal obligation as well as public pressure to oblige platforms to effectively combat this very real threat (Grimes, 2020).

Sources:

Cherry, K. (2020, September 19). Why Do People Believe in Conspiracy Theories? Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/why-people-believe-in-conspiracy-theories-4690335#explanations

Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261

Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Seelig, M. I., Klofstad, C. A., Wuchty, S., Funchion, J. R., Murthi, M. N., Premaratne, K., & Stoler, J. (2021). The Relationship Between Social Media Use and Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation. Political Behavior, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09734-6

Grimes, D. R. (2020). Health disinformation & social media. EMBO Reports, 21(11). https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202051819

Mari, S., Gil De Zúñiga, H., Suerdem, A., Hanke, K., Brown, G., Vilar, R., Boer, D., & Bilewicz, M. (2021). Conspiracy Theories and Institutional Trust: Examining the Role of Uncertainty Avoidance and Active Social Media Use. Political Psychology. Published. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12754

Marcellino, W. (2021). Detecting Conspiracy Theories on Social Media Improving Machine Learning to Detect and Understand Online Conspiracy Theories. RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA.

Min, S. J. (2021). Who Believes in Conspiracy Theories? Network Diversity, Political Discussion, and Conservative Conspiracy Theories on Social Media. American Politics Research, 1532673X211013526.

Stuttaford, A. (2021, March 2). ‘The Nature of Conspiracy Theories’ Review: The Truth Is Out There. WSJ. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-nature-of-conspiracy-theories-review-the-truth-is-out-there-11614640961

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.

Please rate this