How information platforms have changed the classroom

19

October

2017

4.67/5 (6)

The way classes are taught has gone largely unchanged over the past 30-40 years. The format is relatively standard: a teacher stands in front of the lecture hall and speaks for 2-3 hours to a lecture hall filled with 100+ students. Some technical changes are that we have moved from chalkboards to PowerPoint presentations, and some teachers are recording their lectures, which allows students to watch at 1.5x speed from home. Further changes are that students now take notes with laptops instead of with a pen and pencil.

The part that is changing rapidly through digital platforms is the way in which students are making assignments and studying for exams. When study groups are made, the primary method of communication is facebook chat/groups. The first initiative in a group is often that someone makes a new GoogleDocs document and invites everyone. This easy to use technology has given us the ability to work together digitally and more importantly, remotely.

Besides working on projects together through digital platforms, education is also changing in the way that we follow lectures. The current method of studying is that you take your own notes during the lecture, which means that you miss a few things here and there due to distraction. The new way, which I just learned about a few days ago and expect to grow in popularity, is that multiple students have a GoogleDocs document open, and simultaneously take notes, creating synergies by working together to effectively capture all the information. This means that you not only get all the information from the lecturer, but you also have a well-prepared document if you miss a lecture.

Finally, the way we learn is changing due to educational platforms that are available to anyone with an internet connection. Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) are opening up education to the masses, which allows anyone to learn anything about a certain subject, usually free of charge (Alcorn, 2015). In my own experience with calculus, I have relied largely on YouTube videos to explain certain concepts, as it allows you to stop, rewind, and move through the content at your own speed. Furthermore, online platforms allow you to easily ask questions, which are often answered by other students, which is easier than asking a question mid-lecture to a professor that is trying to keep to his/her time plan.

Concluding, education has gone largely unchanged in the manner that it is taught in universities, as there is still a professor standing in front of a lecture hall filled with students. However, the biggest change to education has been the addition of information platforms such as Facebook groups, GoogleDocs, and YouTube, which allow students to effectively work together on assignments and learn from each other.

What other tools do you foresee changing education? Is there reason to believe that school students should also use online-resources for learning?

 

References:

Alcorn, B. (2017, March 17). Who’s Benefiting from MOOCs, and Why. Retrieved October 19, 2017, from https://hbr.org/2015/09/whos-benefiting-from-moocs-and-why

 

 

Please rate this

Author: shaffy roell

453478sr@eur.nl

When you’re 80, your best friend may be an AI companion

2

October

2017

5/5 (1)

In 1900 you ask someone:

Is it possible for a machine to fly in the sky?

Is it possible for a machine to fly up to the moon?

Is it possible for a machine to bring a man up to the moon, let him walk around, and safely come back?

If you had asked any individual in 1900 these questions, you would most likely get a strange look, followed by a no to all three questions. Some may have heard about plans to fly a plane, which they could somehow imagine, but flying up to the moon? That’s just out of the question.

In 1903, The Wright brothers defied the odds and successfully flew and landed the first airplane. Just 55 years later, the USSR sent the first satellite into orbit. Just 13 years later the USA sent the first man up to the moon. This just goes to show how technology is changing, and how we cannot fathom the changes that are coming within our own lifetime, because they seem too far out of reach.

One interesting development, which I think will shape our future way of life is the AI driven companion. Amazon’s Alexa and Apple’s Siri are to artificial companions, as the Wright Brother’s flight were to flight. Consider the possibilities that open up when we combine virtual reality, augmented reality, and AI companions.

One group that will significantly benefit from these advancements is elderly individuals. By 2060, 1 in 5 individuals will be over 60 years old. The loss of social ties and social roles in the elderly means that this population group is prone to depression and associated health problems. Tech start-ups such as Intuition Robotics are looking to combat loneliness by providing AI companions for elderly. Although the products are still in their infancy, I would like to imagine that by the time we are 65+ years old, we will be able to actually see holograms of the companion through augmented reality, or that we will be able to put on virtual reality goggles and actually see and communicate with our AI companion through the various programs that will be available for VR by that time.

What technology do you think will be developed for the aging demographics to combat loneliness? Do you think AI companions will play a role in everyday life?

References:

Michaels, V. (2017, March 07). Public Access – Artificial Intelligence Robot Companion for the Elderly. Retrieved October 03, 2017, from https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/17/artificial-intelligence-robot-companion-for-the-elderly/

Dunbar, B. (2015, April 16). NASA Glenn’s Historical Timeline. Retrieved October 03, 2017, from https://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/about/history/timeline.html

Please rate this

Author: shaffy roell

453478sr@eur.nl

How the internet is revolutionising international payment

14

September

2017

5/5 (1)

You have all experienced the following situation in one way or another: You’re at a social gathering chatting and one friend brings up Bitcoin or another obscure cryptocoin and explains how it’s the future. Although there are a lot of arguments for and against digital currencies, I would like to dive into one use case, which I find the most interesting: international transactions. Without going into technical details regarding blockchain protocols, digital currencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Litecoin allow digital funds to be safely transferred from account to account, without needing to pass through a central institution (bank), which significantly reduces transaction costs.

Developing countries are negatively affected by high international transaction fees

According to the World Bank, last year, international migrants sent USD 441 billion home to their native (developing) countries. Sending money to your native country is called a remittance payment. To show how much developing countries receive from individuals we can compare it to what developing countries receive from the west as aid. Western countries send about USD 150 billion to developing countries, or 1/3 of the amount that individuals send. The problem is that sending money as an individual is expensive due to the numerous intermediary institutions that international transactions need to pass through, which each drive up the price per transaction. According to the World Bank, the global average transaction fee for transferring money across borders is 7.45% of the total amount, which means that last year about USD 33 billion didn’t reach developing countries due to intermediary institutions such as Western Union and Moneygram. Developing countries are thus at a disadvantage, as intermediary institutions charge significant fees to transfer money internationally. Below is an overview of what it costs to send USD 50 to a developing country. The figures are from the World Bank.

 

What will happen to Western Union and Moneygram?

The market leaders facilitating remittance payments are Western Union and Moneygram. Due to the large sums of money that developing countries aren’t receiving due to intermediary payment-institutions, developing countries have a greater incentive to start regulating the use of popular digital currencies for remittance payments. For this reason, the Philippines recently legalized Bitcoin for the benefit of remittance payments. It’s likely that governments of countries that receive significant remittance payments will continue to make strides easing regulation of digital currencies for remittance use, reducing barriers to entry. Numerous remittance start-ups have popped up, making use of cryptocoins with low transaction costs. Individuals transferring money are unlikely to stay loyal to Western Union, opting to make use of a cheaper service. With numerous countries taking up different positions on Bitcoin and digital currencies, the question remains whether

Concluding 

With numerous countries taking up different positions on Bitcoin and digital currencies, the question remains whether digital currency will ever be mainstream accepted by governments. Whether mainstream acceptance comes or not, international payment inefficiency is one of the strongest reasons for why digital currency should be implemented by start-ups and large organizations if they want to decrease transaction costs.

Do you know any other interesting actual use cases for digital currency?

Could there ever be an E-Euro if we continue making strides towards a cashless society?

 

References: 

Remittance Prices Worldwide . (2017). World Bank, (21). Retrieved September 22, 2017, from https://remittanceprices.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/rpw_report_march_2017.pdf.

 

 

Please rate this

Author: shaffy roell

453478sr@eur.nl