Virtual Reality in society. Can it be beneficial?

22

October

2016

No ratings yet.

Virtual reality is generally associated with entertainment and especially with games. But it is so much more than just a new gaming technique, it can be a great benefit for the society as a whole. It often gets a negative image of a technique which creates isolated people and dangerous situations because people do not pay attention to the outside world. But I think that it is so much more than just a new entertainment technique. It can definitely benefit people in other ways than just joy and excitement. This blog will demonstrate three different ways in which virtual reality is going to benefit the way of living of different groups of the society, and because of that the society as a whole.

 

Virtual reality can be used by social anxiety disorders. The technical university of Delft in cooperation with the University of Amsterdam designed special trainings with virtual reality to help people with a social anxiety, like for instance agoraphobia. The phobias will be trained with help of a virtual situation. The patients can get used to the situation in a controlled environment and take little steps at the time by training their social fears. This can improve their lives in foremost manners because they feel less isolated and they can participate again in the society.

 

Virtual reality can also be used by processing of a traumatic experience, like sexual abuse, a robbing or by a post-traumatic stress syndrome for soldiers. In their therapy they can go back to the situation where they experienced the trauma, the so called exposure therapy. By reconstructing the situation, traumas can be processed, which is already widely done but Virtual reality can be of great use to make it really visual.

 

The Dutch government is also using it within preventive detention centres, so called TBS klinieken. Very aggressive convicts which are not safe for themselves and society can be trained to cope with their aggressive behaviour, by using virtual reality. Convicts who stay in such closed environment do not experience the real world and that makes it difficult to practise real world complex situations but Virtual reality can actually provide this ‘real world’. The therapist can measure how those patients react in those situations and track their improvements.

 

Unfortunately, there are also some hitches at the virtual reality. The glasses are getting more affordable in a fast phase but making the virtual environment is still very costly and time consuming. Another downside of this way of therapy and training is that you have to be careful how far you go with the reality, the users are mostly vulnerable people who should be treated very carefully. If the wrong method is used people can be more scared of shocked if they have a phobia or trauma. But if it is used right by trained professionals I think that it will greatly benefit our society and especially the individuals who are now excluded from it.

 

Let me know what your opinion is. Do you think that virtual reality is positive for the society or do you think that it is a threat?

https://decorrespondent.nl/2562/gaat-virtual-reality-ons-betere-mensen-maken/262656240-64da7127

http://www.ggznieuws.nl/home/virtual-reality-geeft-unieke-inkijk-patienten-en-angsten/

http://nos.nl/artikel/2138918-van-je-angststoornis-af-dankzij-virtual-reality.html

 

 

Please rate this

Digital Transformation Project – New ERP System

12

October

2016

No ratings yet.

Due to confidence agreements we replaced the company’s name by *company*

There is definitely need for change at *company*. This project conducted by four Master students of the Rotterdam School of Management will provide a basic understanding of the problem and its optimal solution. *company* is focused on the marine industry. The company is based in the Netherlands and is part of the German multinational which has over 138.000 employees. *company* has an annual turnover of almost 25 million euros and around 150 FTEs. However, *company* has an IT related problem which lowers its competitive advantage. The ERP system of *company*, Ridder R8, is outdated and should be replaced with a modern and fully functioning system. There are two key reasons why *company* should improve its current ERP system. First, in an ever changing world it is of great importance to adapt to new technologies to stay competitive. By having an ERP system which is only functioning partly competitive advantage will be for the competitors of *company*. Second, now is the time to conduct change, economic times have been better in the past but if the demand rises again, *company* has to be on the top of its game to outperform its competitors. The new ERP system should be compatible with *company*’s current systems, it should increase the efficiency and it should be relatively easy to implement. Since *company* is a medium sized company and due to falling turnover the costs of the system should be kept to a minimum. In our report we proposed three alternative solutions: Ridder IQ, SAP and Cloud computing. After analysing the possible solutions thoroughly, Ridder IQ is clearly best suited for *company*. To support this change, it is necessary to have upper management support, Ridder iQ should be implemented in an iterative manner and include future users of the software, involve a Ridder iQ specialist and evaluate the performance of the new ERP system periodically. In addition, further support should come from within the organization, instead of from a Ridder iQ specialist. Lastly, the video proposes a five-step plan for the implementation, consisting of strategic planning, procedure review, data collection, training and testing and lastly go live and evaluate.

Please rate this

Do we still need a wallet in 2020, or do we only need to bring our smartphone with us?

3

October

2016

4/5 (1)

The Dutch government (Rijksdienst voor wegverkeer, RDW) made an announcement today that from 2020 it will be possible to digitalize your driver’s licence. The government will introduce a special mobile application in which you can load your driver’s licence and show it directly on your smartphone. It is already possible to pay by using your smartphone, and there are multiple applications, like Stocard, that store your loyalty cards in one online environment accessible from your smartphone. So my question is: do we still need a wallet in 2020, or do we only need to bring our smartphone with us?

Paying by smartphone gains popularity in a fast pace, but is still in its infancy. Only 9% of the Dutch population uses a smartphone to pay, for instance at the grocery shop, and approximately one third of the population would like to pay by smartphone. So around 60% of the Dutch population says that it is not interested in paying with its smartphone in the near future.  But I think that this number will definitely decrease in the upcoming years. The use of applications which store your loyalty cards is also increasing. Besides, more and more shops make it possible to download an application instead of having to bring your loyalty cards to the store. So after the announcement of the RDW ‘everything’ can be integrated into your smartphone (since a Dutch license is also a ID card in the Netherlands). Your smartphone can store your Money, Personal details, License and loyalty cards.

But there are reasons why, I think, we still have to bring our wallets in 2020. I will discuss the three most important limitations briefly. Not all the current payment systems are compatible for the mobile payment yet. In march 2016 125 thousand of the 325 thousand pin devices were compatible with contactless payment, this is rapidly increasing but there will still be shops, restaurants or vending machines who cannot accept contactless payment in 2020. The second limitation is that not all (smart)phones can be used for paying, the phone must have a NFC chip incorporated. Currently in the Netherlands only the latest Android phones can be used for contactless paying.  And for instance, IPhone cannot be used, since Apple only accepts payments through its own payment application, which is not introduced in the Netherlands yet. Besides the banks and the mobile companies will have to go through severe negotiations about transaction fees for the mobile companies. The third limitation is resistance by the general public. People do simply not see the added value of paying by mobile phone or worry about their privacy, and others will first want to see how the early adopters react to it and follow later when the system is tested more intensively. Privacy has always been a critical point in the digital world, because there is a possibility that hackers hack into your phone.  If your money and personal details are all on it this may cause some huge problems.

 

I think in 2020, smartphones will still be a complement our wallet but not a total substitute yet. This will take a few more years, but I definitely think that the wallet will ‘disappear’ in the future.

What do you think? Let me know, in the comments below.

 

References

https://www.ing.nl/particulier/mobiel-en-internetbankieren/mobiel-betalen/index.html

http://www.marketingfacts.nl/berichten/de-staat-van-mobiel-betalen-in-nederland-in-2016

http://nos.nl/artikel/2135672-app-gaat-plastic-rijbewijs-vervangen.html

https://www.pin.nl/consument/contactloos-betalen-met-betaalpas-of-mobiele-telefoon/hoe-werkt-contactloos-betalen-met-een-mobiel/

https://www.rtvnh.nl/nieuws/192989/rijbewijs-in-2020-op-de-smartphone

Please rate this