Digital Health Ecosystems to Improve US Healthcare?

12

October

2019

No ratings yet.

The healthcare sector in the United States is subject to several trends. First, driven by the growing population and higher life expectancy, healthcare spending is rising fast. Furthermore, investments in digital technologies within healthcare are enormous, and are rising fast, causing healthcare costs to escalate and profit margins to shrink (Allen, 2019). PwC reported that investors have poured $12.5 billion into digital health ventures in the years 2017 and 2018. Comparing this to 2013, the number depicts an increase in funding over 230%, and an increase of 67% percent of the average funding deal (Siwicki, 2019).

These trends are causing three main problems within this sector, which are strongly affecting patients in the US. Namely, the affordability, accessibility, and quality of healthcare (Allen, 2019). Despite the huge investments in digital technologies and the steady stream of technological advances that are being introduced in healthcare on a yearly basis, these technological advancements have not taken care of the three key problems of the healthcare sector. The lower costs, higher quality and greater accessibility have not yet come about in the way that one could expect with all the technological advancements that have come up in the past years (Hwang and Christensen, 2008).

According to Hwang and Christensen (2008) the lack of improvement in the healthcare sector is due to the fact that these advances are not being paired with business model innovations. This is exactly where digital health ecosystems come in. In the long term, digital health ecosystems could cause the disruption of the traditional business model in healthcare.

Digital health ecosystems connect different stakeholders in the healthcare industry. This means that providers, payers, policymakers and patients all have access to data in the ecosystem. In a digital health ecosystem, the digital innovations brought by technology start-ups, high-tech giants, providers and traditional healthcare equipment manufacturing companies can be interconnected (Friesdorf et al., 2019).

Then, what do digital health ecosystems actually change about the delivery of healthcare? For starters, one’s smartwatch could track and instantly upload information on a patient’s health status. Doctors could remotely monitor this patient’s health with the information that is being gathered. Furthermore, by storing and analysing data in real-time, doctors and managers can benchmark performance and increase the accuracy of their diagnosis and treatments. Next to this, patients have open access to providers of care from any setting, for example from the office or their home. By unbundling health care, the disposable part of a traditional visit, the time spent on travelling and the cost and efforts that come with it, can be saved. Healthcare will become more accessible, and customer centric if a doctor offers online coaching and tracking, as patients can monitor their health through different touchpoints (Harvard Business Review Analytic Services, 2017). Patients can choose facilities and appointments most suited to them, and they can be encouraged to engage (Siemens Healthineers, 2019). Engaging and educating patients will ultimately lead to healthier people.

Siemens is a company that tries to tackle the aforementioned cost, quality and accessibility issues by providing the health care sector with a digital health ecosystem platform, alongside their traditional healthcare technology. You can check out Siemens’ website for more information on digital health ecosystems: https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/en-us/healthineers-digital-ecosystem/digital-ecosystem.

 

References:

Allen, S. (2019). 2019 Global health care outlook: Shaping the future. [online] Deloitte, pp.2- 4. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Life-Sciences- Health-Care/gx-lshc-hc-outlook-2019.pdf [Accessed 5 Sep. 2019].

Friesdorf, M., Deetjen, U., Sawant, A., Gilbert, G. and Niedermann, F. (2019). Digital health ecosystems: A payer perspective. [online] McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our- insights/digital-health-ecosystems-a-payer-perspective#.

Harvard Business Review Analytic Services (2017). The Power of Digitalizing Healthcare. [online] Harvard Business Review Analytic Services. Available at: https://hbr.org/sponsored/2017/11/the-power-of-digitalizing-health-care.

Hwang, J. and Christensen, C. (2008). Disruptive Innovat1ion In Health Care Delivery: A Framework For Business-Model Innovation. Health Affairs, [online] 27(5), pp.1329- 1335. Available at: https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1329.

Siemens Healthineers (2019). Siemens Healthineers Digital ecosystem. Retrieved from https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/en-us/healthineers-digital-ecosystem/digital-ecosystem

Siwicki, B. (2019). Here are 6 major issues facing healthcare in 2019, according to PwC. Retrieved from https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/here-are-6-major-issues-facing-healthcare-2019-according-pwc

Photo by Natanael Melchor on Unsplash

Please rate this

Are Chatbots the Future of Customer Service for Small to Medium Sized Companies?

8

October

2019

5/5 (2)

Lately, Facebook has acquired an Israelian start-up, Servicefriend. This start-up builds “hybrid” chatbots based on artificial intelligence, imitating key traits of human beings, namely intelligence, empathy and understanding. Hybrid chatbots are often integrated with an existing user-to-agent communication process, which can be social media, webchat services or email. The hybrid chatbot will manage the conversation when it understands the user’s request, preventing annoying messages like: “I cannot follow your request” from popping up on the screens of users. Servicefriend has cooperated with Facebook in the past, building bots for the messaging platform Messenger. The bots developed for this platform, allow companies to complement teams of humans and increase the scale of their customer services on messaging platforms.

There are vast potential benefits to sophisticated AI powered chatbots and AI-based assistants. Smart Home assistants, such as Alexa and Google Home, have been extremely important in shaping the public’s perception of bots. These sophisticated bots are able to have extensive conversations with humans, and are able to present information to humans. However, the general consensus around the use of bots in an organisational context seems to be shifting these days.

Many organisations are specifically looking to make their customer service teams more efficient, by speeding up their service delivery processes. Also, chatbots can help in reducing customer service costs. Therefore, there is a huge interest from organisations in chatbots, Oracle surveyed over 800 professionals in different business disciplines on the adaptation of chatbots. The results speak to themselves: 80% of the surveyed brands plan on adopting chatbots for customer service efforts by 2020.

In 2018, Spicework announced the results of a survey they conducted among organisations. There were vast differences between the expected implementation of chatbots between large businesses and medium or small sized businesses. Of the large organisations, 40% indicated that they were expecting to implement one or more AI chatbots or intelligent assistants. Of the medium and small sized organisations, only respectively 25% and 27% of the organisation indicated that they are expecting to implement these technologies.

For the small to medium sized organisations in particular, the implementation of sophisticated chatbots comes with higher costs and a lot of difficulties during implementation. 25% of the organisations that Spicework surveyed, indicate that the high costs of implementing chatbots and intellectual AI assistants keep them from implementing these technologies. Next to this, only 20% of IT professionals that were surveyed in the study, think that the organisation they work for has the proper skills, talent, and resources to implement and support AI technology. Therefore, you could conclude that complementing customer service teams with bots is the practical way forward for these organisations, replacing these teams is not.

References:
Business Insider (2019). 80% of businesses want chatbots by 2020. Retrieved from
https://www.businessinsider.com/80-of-businesses-want-chatbots-by-2020-2016-12?international=true&r=US&IR=T

Lunden, I. (2019). Facebook has acquired Servicefriend, which builds ‘hybrid’ chatbots, for Calibre customer service. Retrieved from
https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/21/facebook-servicefriend/

Reddy, T. (2017). How chatbots can help reduce customer service costs by 30%. Retrieved from
https://www.ibm.com/blogs/watson/2017/10/how-chatbots-reduce-customer-service-costs-by-30-percent/

Spiceworks (2018). Spice works study reveals 40 percent of large businesses will implement intelligent assistants or chatbots by 2019. Retrieved from
https://www.spiceworks.com/press/releases/spiceworks-study-reveals-40-percent-large-businesses-will-implement-intelligent-assistants-chatbots-2019/

Photo by Jason Leung on Unsplash.

Please rate this