Do we deserve the right to repair?

10

October

2021

No ratings yet.
Apple breidt iPhone-reparatiediensten uit met honderden nieuwe locaties in  de VS - Apple (NL)

What is right to repair?

The right to repair simply means that if you own something, you should be able to repair it, and be provided the basic resources to help do that. These resources include reasonable access to manuals, schematics, and software updates, as well as publicly available parts and tools, and the ability to customize devices as you wish, and finally devices themselves should be made to facilitate repair as best as possible.

There’s been a steadily rising push from community and citizen action groups to make changes in legislation and empower the right to repair.

This push for legislation comes from an also steadily rising problem, as more and more companies make their products harder or even impossible to repair.

How big is the problem?

Big companies that service millions of customers are starting to increasingly lock down their products, so that self-repair becomes more difficult, and customers will have to rely on the firm’s repair center and the prices that come with it, or simply have to purchase a new device.

One example of this is a ‘feature’ introduced in new iPhones. It comprises of a software lock that disables several of the phone’s services when the battery has found to be tampered with, even when it has simply been replaced with another apple battery. The iPhone then displays a message indicating that it will need to be serviced by an apple approved repair vendor.

Another example is the joy-con drift, commonly found in Nintendo’s latest gaming console the Switch. In short, it’s very common for the controllers the “joy-cons” to start to experience drift after being used for some time, this means the controllers will automatically point in one direction. Solving an issue like this is relatively simple considering it just means a part of the inside of the controller is misaligned. The issue comes because Nintendo has come up with several ways to dissuade the repair of its product and encourages consumers to go through Nintendo’s own repair service.

A final controversial issue is the planned obsolescence controversy surrounding apple (they get into trouble for right to repair a lot!).  Planned obsolescence is when inherent and proactively chosen features of a device will make it obsolete or unable to perform as effectively in the future. Reddit users discovered that Apple had been intentionally feeding older phones updates that slowed down their performance, which would incentivize users to buy a newer iPhone.

Needless to say, companies are getting more brazen in their fight against the right to repair.

The case for right to repair

It’s easy to see the benefits of right to repair, it will allow consumers to extend the life of their products, and its exponentially more sustainable in practice. Currently, if one part of an iPhone is broken, often the entire phone ends up getting replaced, which creates far more electronic waste than is necessary.

Electronic waste is an especially dangerous problem for developing countries, where the infrastructure for getting rid of hazardous material is underfunded or simply does not exist. Therefore, it should be in everyone’s interest to limit the amount of electronic waste and make the personal device market a more sustainable and durable one.

Possible solutions?

Many solutions are being considered to strengthen the right to repair. As mentioned before there are several growing community advocacy groups that are lobbying for politicians to change the policy around the right to repair and inhibit the predatory practices that limit it.

Another solution is more of a market-based solution. France is one of the early introducers of this solution. They have written legislation that forces companies to provide a “repairability index” as part of their product offering. This index signals to consumers how repairable a device is and will hopefully influence consumers to make the right choice when purchasing devices. It is in the interest of the consumer since a high repairability score probably translates to better value for money in the end.

I don’t know what the final solution to help strengthen the right to repair will be, or if it will even be addressed and become a mainstream political topic anytime soon, but either way it is important for people to be aware of this issue as the world around them becomes increasingly digital and run by or through personal devices.

Sources:

https://www.ifixit.com/News/32343/apple-is-locking-batteries-to-iphones-now

https://www.techradar.com/news/nintendo-is-being-sued-over-joy-con-drift-again

https://www.howtogeek.com/731791/what-is-planned-obsolescence-and-how-does-it-affect-my-devices/

https://grist.org/climate/why-frances-new-repairability-index-is-a-big-deal/

Please rate this

Home Robots, where have they been and where are they going?

6

October

2021

No ratings yet.

Home robots have been a pipe dream for a long time. Since the 1940s at least, home or domestic robots have been a popular theme in pop culture, and have captured the imaginations of people everywhere. It would be great to outsource all of your chores to a robot that never sleeps, doesn’t require food (besides electricity), and gets to work immediately.

The problem with these dramatized conceptions of home robots is that they’ve always been misaligned with the technical capabilities of their time. This is why (although there has been failed attempts) none of these types of robots ever made it into the mainstream thus far. These robots simply could not handle the complexity of the tasks that people envisioned they could do.

It’s worth mentioning that the one home robot that has hit the mainstream is the vacuum robot (commonly a Roomba). It has achieved great commercial success, filling millions of homes around the world. And its easy to understand why this robot did work. Its task is very simple, it works on one plane and all it has to do is travel around that plane, make sure it doesn’t get stuck, and cover all possible areas. And even this it fails in often. A Roomba lying on its back like a turtle or jammed into a corner under the couch is an incredibly disappointing image if you’re looking at home robots with the rose coloured glasses of the 1950s.

But all hope is not yet lost, now that artificial intelligence, machine learning, and the wide availability of computing have empowered the potential for home robots, we are seeing strides towards those friendly robots envisioned long ago. Imagine an in home robot sommelier, that stores your wine, and can recommend and pour a glass for you instantly. Or the in home amazon security drones, that create digital models of your home and know the best ways to keep you safe. Maybe the ceiling mounted robotic arm being developed by Honda, that can follow you around and clean up your messes through clever AI and sensor systems.

Although people have been doing it for the last 100 years, it seems like maybe right now is actually a good time to be excited about home robots, they are getting closer and closer to being commercially viable, and I think the biggest indicator of that is the amount of companies that are getting heavily invested in these projects. But who knows, maybe I’m still just dreaming.

Sources:

https://www.wired.com/story/robots-use-ai-learn-clean-your-house/

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54285692

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelashley/2021/03/28/ai-and-robotics-are-finally-ready-for-your-home-and-i-dont-mean-the-roomba/?sh=76c3f6fb89d2

Please rate this