Analogue Travel Giant Thomas Cook Fails Miserably In The Digital World

1

October

2019

5/5 (1)

Thomas Cook’s bankruptcy was all over the news in the last week of September. The travel giant employing 22.000 people worldwide (BBC, 2019a) failed to keep up with the digitalization of its industry and had to cease operations. New entrants, such as Booking.com, Airbnb and Expedia disrupted the travel industry with digital platform solutions. Thomas Cook is the first analogue giant we see to fail but probably not the last one.

The 178 years old conglomerate started off in 1841 by organizing railway outings for the members of the temperance movement in Market Harborough (BBC, 2019b). The company’s core competence remained the same ever since. Thomas Cook was organizing journeys for the public taking care of every little detail. The package tour concept required a vertically integrated firm managing flight, hotel and restaurant bookings and arranging activities for the traveling customers. As BBC (2019b) notes, the company diversified in the early 2000s’ and started to operate its own airline managing a fleet of 34 aircrafts as of 2019.

Financial markets have been signalling the potential catastrophe of the firm. Their stock price has been sharply decreasing from 136 GBP in May 2018 to zero by September 2019 (yahoo! finance, 2019). The firm has been struggling with restructuring itself while analysts were worried about the frequent exceptional one-off items on the P&L accounts which is always a red flag (BBC, 2019b). Thomas Cook accumulated £1.7bn debt and announced the need to secure £200m of extra funds to prevent bankruptcy (Bailey, 2019). Financiers have lost faith and refrained from further investments.

What were the root causes of the flop of this established British giant with a strong brand and huge customer base? The travel bookings business has moved online at a glance, but Cook’s business remained offline, operating 600 physical stores (Sims, 2019). In the pre-online era Cook’s business model was based on filling the information asymmetry between travellers and destinations. The rise of internet penetration and online platforms dramatically cut search costs for the end users. Thomas Cook also functioned as a platform. A platform far behind its online competitors in efficiency and scalability. Providing trustworthiness also ceased to differentiate the company from competitors as people rely on online review sites such as Yelp or Tripadvisor nowadays.

Besides missing the digital transformation of its industry, Thomas Cook also failed to recognize that changing consumer tastes made their package tour proposition less and less appealing. Millennials admire freedom and prefer to plan their trips themselves. Online competitors decoupled Cook’s business model and youngsters prefer to put their itinerary together using multiple service providers. No doubt that it is hard to imagine a group of teenagers sitting in a Neckerman office flicking through a magazine before consulting with their designated travel agent on which flight to chose for the weekend’s trip.

References

Bailey (2019) Thomas Cook Goes Bankrupt Leaving 600,000 Passengers Stranded https://simpleflying.com/thomas-cook-goes-bankrupt/

BBC (2019a)  Thomas Cook collapses as last-ditch rescue talks fail https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49791249

BBC (2019b) Thomas Cook: What went wrong at the holiday firm? https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46452374

Sims (2019) How Could Travel Giant Thomas Cook Fail? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/23/travel/why-thomas-cook-travel-collapsed.html

yahoo! finance (2019) Thomas Cook Group plc (TCG.L) https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/quote/TCG.L

Please rate this

The rise of the sharing economy in a time where trust levels have reached a downfall

16

October

2017

Airbnb, Peerby, Snapcar, Uber, a list that seems to grow day by day. All these companies have something big in common, their business models are based on the principles of trust.  But in a time where suspicion, mistrust and fear overrule faith, hope and believe, how can these companies thrive?

The current decade has shown us that people have lost their trust in companies, governments, NGO’s and other institutions. (The Trust barometer Global report, 2017) The most recent and painful occurrence that marks this era was the decision of the United Kingdom to leave the European Union. While on one side we seem to lose faith in the power of governments and institutions, we have arrived in a worldwide where companies thrive on the fundaments of sharing. One of the companies that absolutely shook the world upside down with a business model based on the principles of the sharing economy is Airbnb. Joe Gebbia Co founder of Airbnb pitched the following idea to his investors:

We want to build a website where people publicly post pictures of their most intimate spaces, their bedrooms, the bathrooms — the kinds of rooms you usually keep closed when people come over. And then, over the Internet, they’re going to invite complete strangers to come sleep in their homes. It’s going to be huge!” – Joe Gebbia

After his pitch he was disappointed to hear no one was interested. But no wonder the investors were not interested, this was so new, so risky and so not like anything else. Luckily Joe Gebbia did not give up on his idea. Now an average of 425000 people use Airbnb every night worldwide. Airbnb is one of the biggest ‘hotels’ in the world, without physically owning a single hotel. It is currently valued at $31 billion, almost twice the value of the 98-year old Hilton which does own actual real estate. (Overfelt, 2017)

Now the question remains, why does it work? How come people felt this idea was idiotic and ridiculous back in 2008 and are now happy to share their car, drill or even their home?

The key principle according to Joe Gebbia is “The connection beyond transaction”. (Gebbia, 2016). The foundation of the business model is still is based on the economic transaction made, regardless the nature of this trade. And the connection made is more than just a bonus. It means you actually share a part of yourself with this stranger, which in some cases even leads to a real friendship. However, you also bear a responsibility with you since the renter trusts you with his or her personal belongings. The fact that all these business models work so well is that people can step out of their comfort zone but at the same time a safety net is provided by means of a review and reputation system. In all business models the review aspect is at the center of success.

According to a recent study by PWC on the sharing economy, 89% of consumer panelists agreed that the sharing-economy marketplace is based on trust between providers and users, and 69% said they would not trust a sharing-economy company unless recommended by someone they personally trust. (PWC, 2015)

This emphasizes the bridge that people have to build in order to participate and engage in the sharing economy. People need a confirmation that the stranger they are about to do business with is indeed a trustworthy person. Bias is something that we can’t ignore and will always be present. One of the strongest biasness we have is that we tend to trust people based on their similarity only, which is called homophile. However, a good rating and review system can help to counteract as shown by a study from Stanford University. If a person has more than 10 positive reviews, the perception will change and reputation is seen as more important than similarity. (Gebbia, 2016) This shows that their is a way to break through the ceiling of bias.

That the sharing economy is booming is well known, and it has been flourishing by promising new technologies. Especially the ease at which individuals can connect and exchange information and goods is ground-breaking. However, one must not forget that these platforms and business models can only truly thrive when supported by a good, well-established political and societal context.(PWC, 2015) Especially legislation and governance has not proven to be ready for these transformational companies.


Sources

Edelman. 2017. The 2017 Trust Barometer Global Report, I [online]. Available at: https://www.edelman.com/global-results/ (Accessed: 12/10/2017)

Gebbia, Joe. 2016. Ted Talks. How Airbnb designs for trust. [online].https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16cM-RFid9U (Accessed: 12/10/2017)

 Overfelt. M May 2017. It’s been a trip to $31 billion. Now Airbnb wants to remake the entire industry. [online] Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/15/its-been-a-fantastic-voyage-to-31-billion-what-airbnbs-next-big-trip-isnt-booked.html (Accessed 7/10/2017)

Stein, J. January 2015. Sharing Economy: Baby, You Can Drive My Car, and Do My Errands, and Rent My Stuff… [online] available at: http://time.com/3687305/testing-the-sharing-economy/  (Accessed 8/10/2017)

Price Waterhouse Coopers C.  2015.  The Sharing Economy Consumer Intelligence Series. [online] available at: http://www.pwc.com/CISsharing (Accessed 9/10/2017)

No ratings yet.

Please rate this

4.5/5 (8) 50k views and counting, how to get MASSIVE views!!!

9

October

2017

 

 
Hello fellow BIM students,

Some of you might have noticed that certain posts are getting massive amounts of views.

all time high

The first thing that pops into your mind might be that these guys are actively sharing their content on social media. This is unlikely though because getting this many unique views on one post in one day (see images below) is really really hard to accomplish through that method.

13k views one day

13k views one day

The next possibility you might think about is that they are hiring a group of people through some view boosting website like the one below.

viewbotwebsite

However, we are all students, meaning that we have low budgets and would rather spend our money on partying, Netflix/Spotify subscriptions and other more rewarding activities. So I don’t consider this option viable in our situation.

So how do the top posts get their crazy amount of views? Did they press F5 non-stop for a couple of weeks in order to reach the top?

f5 broken

There must be some sort of secret method to their success. In this post, I would like to share my easy method with you guys to help boost YOUR view count up to 5k, 10k or even 50k! Let’s go!

Step 1: Decide the post that you want to boost!

This is obviously a very basic step, in order to get views on a post, you need to have posted at least some content. In this example, I use a very basic article I wrote about IBM’s supercomputer Watson (check it out: http://bit.ly/2y71SxK).

IBM watson article 2

 

Step 2: Download the Opera browser and open the blog post in multiple tabs!

Viewbotting on 5 tabs

Step 3: This is where the magic comes in, download the Super Auto Refresh extension for Opera!

Super Auto Refresh extension Opera

Step 4: Start the Extension and make it run on all tabs at a speed of 30 seconds!

Super refresher extension Opera browser

Why do I give you guys the advice to run it on 5/6 tabs max at a speed of 30 seconds? Because I encountered many many errors on the first days using this method running it at faster speeds. These error messages, see below, cause not only me but every other user trying to access the website to experience problems.

Internal Server Error

Service Unavailable

So if you don’t want a group of angry students chasing you because they couldn’t upload their blog posts please take this advice.

IS blog troubles


Step 5: Get some spare laptops, plug them into their chargers and don’t touch them for a couple of days/weeks!

This will help you feel like a real hacker and boosts the feeling that you can join Anonymous because you know your computer stuff.

3 laptops setup

 

Step 6: Watch your article reach some magic milestones! You are finally reaching the top of the list!
1000 views mark

2000 views mark

9999 views

20000 views

30k views

WAIT FOR IT…. 50k VIEWS WOAH!

50k views

Step 7: Sit back and relax, you did some really awesome hacking and can now enjoy your success for the rest of your life! You will always be remembered as that BIM student that knew how to reach the top!

all time high

As much as I enjoyed abusing the view count system behind https://digitalstrategy.rsm.nl// I would like to give some quick advice to the website admin. As soon as I realized that F5 views were counted as unique views although they came from the same IP-Address I started to look for ways to maximize my view count. I think that this in no way reflects the quality of my blog post and can actually destroy the intention of this web page. So to prevent things like this happening in the future please try to cap the number of views per IP-address or find some other way to achieve this.

Thanks for reading guys and enjoy your road to success!

Please rate this

Airbnb Gets Support in a Fight for Business Travelers

7

October

2017

No ratings yet.

Airbnb has gained reputation as the world’s largest online community marketplace that connects people looking to rent their homes with people who are looking for accommodations. It has taken away profits from hotels all over the world, and is valued nowadays at $31 billion (Thomas, 2017), which is more than the market value of Hilton ($23.33 billion) and Hayat chains combined ($6.87 billion) (Skift, 2016).

Nevertheless, the war between Airbnb and traditional hotel chains is not yet over. In 2008 Airbnb entered the fight by targeting leisure consumers who required cheaper prices and larger variety of accommodations than traditional hotels could offer. Nowadays, the growth area with a largest potential for Airbnb is the business market. Even though business guests have for long remained loyal to traditional hotels, their approach to travel is changing. They demand the opportunity to immerse themselves in the area they are travelling to fully.  In order to win business travelers’ attention, Airbnb launched a “Business Travel Ready” feature in 2015, which helps users select accommodation that matches specific search requirements, such as comfortable desk and Wi-Fi.

This year it is time for Airbnb to make the next move in a fight for business consumers. Airbnb has recently announced a trial partnership with WeWork (Mogg, 2017). WeWork is the world’s largest provider of shared work spaces, renting desks to freelance workers, startups and larger companies that don’t want to sign an office lease (Zaleski, 2017). It offers everything you need: a super-fast internet, business-class printers, micro-roasted coffee, office suppliers, daily cleaning, fresh fruit water, comfortable common areas. While booking a room on Airbnb’s site during the trial period, business travelers will be able to reserve a Spot at WeWork location closest to the place where they are staying. This partnership is expected to strengthen both platform businesses. Airbnb hopes to attract some business travelers who need to focus away from their unmade bed, and WeWork expects to enlarge its customer base by getting closer to young entrepreneurs.

Even though the platforms have not signed any permanent deals yet, the efforts of Airbnb show that the platform wants to extend its services beyond just accommodation. Would you book a spot in a modern and stylish WeWork location via Airbnb? Do you think the partnership will succeed?

 

References:

Mogg, T., (2017). Business Travelers, Airbnb Is About To Make It Easier To Find A Workspace. Available from: < https://www.digitaltrends.com/web/airbnb-wework-business-travelers/> Accessed [07-10-2017].

Skift, D., (2016). Airbnb’s Latest Investment Values It as Much as Hilton and Hyatt Combined. Available from: Accessed [07-10-2017].

Thomas, L., (2017). Airbnb just closed a $1 billion round and became profitable in 2016. Available from: Accessed [07-10-2017].

Zaleski, O., (2017). Airbnb Teams Up With WeWork to Lure Business Travelers. Available from: Accessed [07-10-2017].

Please rate this

Should we regulate companies like Uber and Airbnb?

30

September

2017

5/5 (1)

In the last decade, there have been a lot of popular businesses like Uber and Airbnb operating in the sharing economy (Penn & Wihbey, 2016).  With Airbnb valued at $10 billion and Uber at $18,2 billion, they are disrupting the traditional hotel chains and taxis companies respectively (Cannon & Summers, 2014). It is not hard to see why since the pricing is lower, more transparent and on top of that gives both suppliers and users more flexibility (Zervas, Proserpio & Byers, 2014).

While there have been a lot of upsides, especially from the customer’s perspective, there are also some negatives. For example, Uber and Lyfe still have a lot regulatory issues in multiple countries and are even banned from some areas (GCF, 2017). The Uber drivers don’t have to abide all these rules traditional taxi drivers are bound by, which leads to an unfair competitive advantage. Furthermore, traditional hotels are held to a certain standard, have regulations and are being inspected for safety risks like firetraps. The apartments on Airbnb have none of the aforementioned rules and safety checks, so the customer could possibly be exposed to one or more risks.

Although services like Uber have unwritten rules, for example, an Uber drive is expected to take the shortest route. If the customer is not happy with the driver or the route he took, there is an option to leave a bad review or even ask Uber for a compensation. So in a way, Uber and similar companies are already being regulated, although not in the traditional way with rules but by the users themselves. If you add more rules and regulations to this system, it may hinder the natural process.

The sharing economy gives back power to the user, but this also comes with downsides. In general, these companies do give customers more options to pick from, though you have to be aware of the added risks. Rules do not always mean better service and could even hurt what makes the sharing economy so strong, a user regulated service. It is an interesting question how many rules exactly should be in place if any.

 

 

References:

  • Cannon, S., & Summers, L. H. (2014). How Uber and the sharing economy can win over regulators. Harvard business review, 13(10), 24-28.
  • Edelman, B.G., Geradin, D. (2015) Efficiencies and regulatory shortcuts: How should we regulate companies like Airbnb and uber?
  • Koopman, C., Mitchell, M.D. and Thierer, A.D. (2015) The Sharing Economy and Consumer Protection Regulation: The Case for Policy Change. The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law, Vol. 8 Iss 2, 2015
  • GCF, n.d. Sharing Economy: Legal and Safety issues in the Sharing economy. [Online]
    Available at: https://www.gcflearnfree.org/sharingeconomy/legal-and-safety-issues-in-the-sharing-economy/1/
  • Penn, O. & Wihbey, J., 2016. Uber, Airbnb and consequences of the sharing economy: Research roundup – Journalist’s Resource. [Online]
    Available at: https://journalistsresource.org/studies/economics/business/airbnb-lyft-uber-bike-share-sharing-economy-research-roundup
  • Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. W. (2014). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. Journal of Marketing Research.

Picture:
http://dailysignal.com/wp-content/uploads/airbnb-1250×650.jpg

Please rate this

The end of AirBnB?

22

October

2016

5/5 (4)

The founders of AirBnB have been in a nice and educational rollercoaster: starting with an air mattress in the living room to an international platform with accommodation in 34,000 cities in 191 countries.

Their strategy was different from that of other disruptive organizations. Where a company like Uber heartlessly attacked the taxi market from day one, for example totally ignoring the current market and its employees, AirBnB chose a seemingly social way. To the outside world in recent years it seems to be a great success story that sounds like a optimistic entrepreneurs lecture.

But AirBnB is in trouble. The representatives of the State of New York filed a law that threatens the business model of AirBnb in New York. In the end of next week, Governor Cuomo decides whether to sign or veto the law. In 2010, New York passed a law which prohibits leasing apartment complexes in Manhattan for a period shorter than 30 days. But this is the core activity of Airbnb. The law is therefore not met. Therefore they have proposed an even stricter law: who rents his apartment through Airbnb for short term, will be fined with $ 7,500.

The big success of AirBnB, seems to destroy the company and forces AirBnB to make choices. Most important: short-term exponential growth or long-term sustainable existence. Growth is a conscious choice, but city authorities are not entirely happy with that growth. On the one hand they appreciate the new flow of tourists, but on the other hand they are responsible for defending the interests of the city and its inhabitants.

I think it is really important to think about the interests of the citizens, but cities need to give new developments like AirBnB a place in the current policy. For example policy about the affordability of houses, the occurrence of inconvenience and to make sure the business is fair. Because this kind of companies are the future.

The municipality of Amsterdam conceived as examples three very simple rules: 1. Do not exceed sixty days per year; 2. No more than four people at a time; 3. Not in social housing. Is this verifiable and will new regulations focused on disruptive companies safe AirBnB?

Interesting is to look at the website InsideAirBnB.com, which creates maps of the data from AirBnB.
When we take a look of the map of Amsterdam (sorry it’s my hometown and the site doesn’t contain a map of Rotterdam) we see that a solution for this conflict of interests is needed!

 

airbnbairbnb2

http://insideairbnb.com/amsterdam/

https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/10/20/new-york-bindt-strijd-aan-met-airbnb-4914291-a1527622https://
www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/08/29/airbnb-moet-zelf-de-regels-handhaven-4048140-a1518490https://
www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/10/20/new-york-vs-airbnb-strijd-om-toekomst-van-verhuursite-4902724-a1527496

Please rate this

Competing with Airbnb

11

October

2016

No ratings yet.

Yesterday the two European online accommodation platforms 9flats and Wimdu announced that they are going to merge, this in order to be able to compete with the well-known American market leader Airbnb.

Both companies were originally founded in Germany. 9Flats claims to offer 250.000 apartments worldwide and Wimdu offers around 300.000 residences, so together offering over a half million accommodations. Airbnb offers four times this amount through their platform, namely approximately two million accommodations (Techcrunch, 2016).

Important to notice is that online accommodation platforms are subject to increasing regulations in Europe. In 2014, Berlin implemented a law that prohibits short-term rentals, and checks properties actively to see if this implemented properly. Other cities, like Amsterdam, London, and Paris regulate the rentals through the number of rooms that can be rented, the number of persons and the rental period, which seems more favourable for the economy. In Brussels, homes can only be rented when permission is given from the owner, while this is not obligated in above-mentioned cities. The European Commission has stated in its 2015 digital single market strategy paper that sharing platforms ‘’offer opportunities for increased efficiency, growth and jobs, through improved customer choice, but also potentially raises new regulatory questions.’’ (European Commission, 2015, p11). At the moment sharing platforms are still supported by the European Commission, however legislation concerns the online accommodation platforms for the future.

Roman Bach, former CEO of 9flats, will lead the joint entity that is going to be headquartered in Singapore. 9flats already moved its business to Singapore, due to increasing limiting legislation. He stated that this merge would enable them to create a stronger value proposition for their guests and hosts, while simultaneously accelerating growth and improving long-term profitability (Wiwo, 2016).

I believe that if the new joint entity would be able to successfully increase their market share, by adding scale and entering more markets, it would have a chance against Airbnb. It has to mitigate the risk of increasing legislation by reaching into more markets and promoting their platform to both hosts and guests, in order to compete with the American current market leader.

 

References:

Airbnb rivals Wimdu and 9flats consolidate

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/568345/EPRS_BRI(2015)568345_EN.pdf

http://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0192&from=EN

http://www.nu.nl/internet/4333952/airbnb-concurrenten-wimdu-en-9flats-gaan-fuseren.html

Please rate this

Airbnb: Disrupting Your Neighbourhood Since 2009

7

October

2016

4.67/5 (3)

Airbnb is a well-known example of a company that promotes the sharing economy. This platform markets itself as a company that enables house owners to share their house, make money and meet new people. Sounds very promising, right? But things might be less auspicious than it seems…

I have to admit: the founders of Airbnb did a great job, they disrupted the hotel industry within a few years. But the founders probably didn’t expect that the social structure of a city would change dramatically due to a growing number of Airbnb stays. An example of such a city is Amsterdam, the documentary ‘Slapend Rijk’ of VPRO Tegenlicht gives an excellent overview of the situation in this city.

The popularity of Airbnb caused huge problems in the city center, the property prices increased with an average amount of €100,000. The consequence is that Chinese and Russians are buying these properties as an investment, their only intention is to rent the property on Airbnb. The balance between tourism and residents is disturbed and also nuisance is increasing (think about screaming tourists and clanging trolleys). In order to reduce nuisance, Airbnb signed an agreement with the municipality of Amsterdam in 2014. This agreement should reduce illegal rentals (limited to 60 days/year) and would force Airbnb to pay taxes (5%), but Airbnb didn’t want to share the data of their 18,000 owners.

The agreement didn’t solve the problems, so the residents and municipality are seeking other ways of reducing nuisance of Airbnb renters. They are e.g. hiring detective agencies to catch owners who rent their property illegally. Furthermore, GroenLinks Amsterdam (a political party) started a website called ‘Fairbnb’. This website pays attention to the problems in Amsterdam regarding Airbnb. It’s also possible to report a complaint or to come up with possible solutions to solve these problems.

The easiest solution for tourists, residents and investors is: go to Rotterdam! Another idea is that Airbnb changes their way of doing business. They need to take the social structures of a city into account by monitoring the rentals and by adhering the agreements with important Airbnb cities. The municipalities could improve the situation by forcing owners to register their house if they want to rent it (on Airbnb). There is nothing wrong with renting or sharing your house, but it should be done correctly.

Sources:
http://www.vpro.nl/programmas/tegenlicht/kijk/afleveringen/2016-2017/slapend-rijk.html
http://www.vpro.nl/programmas/tegenlicht/lees/bijlagen/2016-2017/slapend-rijk/airbnb-in-nederland.html
https://www.groene.nl/artikel/een-luchtbedje-met-ontbijt
https://www.fairbnb.amsterdam/

 

Please rate this

Is the growth of Airbnb sustainable?

4

October

2016

No ratings yet.

The rise of the sharing economy was introduced by several e-commerce, not so much anymore start-, ups. The peer-to-peer markets have replaced the traditional markets. The peer-to-peer markets introduce a business model formally unknown to the traditional markets. The markets no longer maintain their own resources to among other things decrease the costs of operating, but this also increases the risk that the growth of the company cannot be sustained. The intermediaries in the peer-to-peer market have an increasing stake in both sides of the supply and demand side of the market.  An example is Airbnb influencing the revenue made by hotels. The impact it has on the hotel market is yet not identifiable. The causal impact of this phenomenon on the market revenue created by hotels is unidentifiable because of the non-uniformly distributed impact it has on the consumers. (Zervas et al., 2016)

The rising of Airbnb
The company has outgrown the united states into a global company. The growth of the company into the European market and Asian market is facilitated by government guidelines. The European Commission is supporting the growth of a sharing economy as an opportunity for entrepreneurs and the overall economy (Taylor, 2016). The stated goal by Airbnb of 10 billion dollars of revenue by 2020 compared to the current revenue of 900 million dollars in 2015 also supports the opportunistic expected growth (Taylor, 2016; Kokalitcheva, 2015).

But is the growth sustainable
Several problems arise with the growth of such sharing economies. The rating of Uber drivers is often described as biased, with opinions influenced by among other things by racism (Harman, 2014). And, it seems that a similar effect is occurring within Airbnb. Research shows that members are able to among other things, charge more than other up to 12% because of their physical appearance. When members have increasing concerns about discrimination caused by the members despite the current policies by Airbnb against racism. It then might be justified to wonder such a sharing economy is economically sustainable. (Harman, 2014).

So at the end could the growing business model to exclude their own stock be sustainable or to secure the growth should sharing economies maintain their own stock for operations?

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=2366898
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/01/how-airbnb-is-growing-a-far-flung-global-empire.htmlhttp://fortune.com/2015/06/17/airbnb-valuation-revenue/
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2014/nov/12/algorithms-race-discrimination-uber-lyft-airbnb-peer

Please rate this