Falling Asleep While Driving: Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Software

10

October

2021

5/5 (3)

Elon Musk has recently been dropping hints about the Full Self-Driving Software in his Twitter messages. For a 199 dollar subscription per month, Tesla drivers will very soon be able to get the Full Self-Driving package. The beta testing is currently ongoing, the moment many Tesla fans have been waiting on for years. The company has made a promise back in 2016, ambitiously claiming that all the new vehicles will have the hardware capability for “full self-driving” and that it would soon offer complementary software to make the cars drive autonomously. Musk has personally said that he believes people will be able to fall asleep in Teslas while they are driving.  

The videos from recent testers show that the software is able to recognize traffic signs and crossings, and also takes pedestrians and other vehicles on the road into account. But despite its name, the actual Full Self-Driving Software is not capable of allowing the car to drive completely autonomously. Another video of the testers showed that the software is still quite far from copying human driving and often makes mistakes such as driving right into objects. This could be very dangerous, this is proven as car crashes while using the AutoPilot mode have been more and more prevalent. Hence, the company emphasizes that the driver should stay alert at all times when using AutoPilot and Full Self-Driving. 

There are not only safety concerns surrounding the software, there are also ethical concerns. There are moral considerations that the programmers have to keep in mind when developing the software. A common hypothetical involves a choice between taking an action that will kill either 5 people or only 2 people. What instructions will the autonomous driving computers have pre-loaded?

In conclusion, Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Software seems to be full of promises, but in reality, the safety and ethical concerns should be kept in mind for the software to be truly successful.

Please rate this

Would you fly with a pilotless plane?

25

September

2017

5/5 (2) Autonomous driving is currently one of the hottest topics in the field of artificial intelligence. However, a much less talked-about mode of transportation that could also become autonomous in the future is flying. The airline industry is known for its low profit margins, and in 2012 airlines made an average of $4 per passenger carried. It thus makes sense that airlines always try to find ways to cut costs and one of the ways to do that is by cutting the number of crew members per flight. The number of crew members in the cockpit has already declined over the years, but will we soon see commercial airplanes without a cockpit at all?

 

During the 1950s, when commercial flying began to grow rapidly, there were five crew members in the cockpit: a pilot, a co-pilot, a flight engineer, a navigator and a radio operator. As technology improved, the tasks of the navigator, the radio operator and the flight engineer were replaced by computers. And with the introduction of the autopilot, constant hands-on control by a human was not necessary anymore. It is however important to note that the autopilot cannot replace human operators, as it merely assists them in controlling the aircraft. The pilot and co-pilot have to constantly monitor and adjust the aircraft’s navigation and systems, communicate with air traffic control and prepare for the next phase of the flight.

 

Tests have been done to reduce the number of pilots from two to one, but this reduction is not expected to come in the very near future. If the reduction from two to one is already such a difficult task, how likely would it be to go from two pilots to no pilots at all? Last June, Mike Sinnett, Boeing’s vice president of product development, announced that Boeing wants to test aspects of self-flying passenger aircrafts next year. He also stated that the basic building blocks of the technology are already available. These are however only tests on the aspects of self-flying aircrafts and an aeronautics professor at the Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida says that even optimists predict that pilotless flying is at least 50 years away from now.

 

However, even if autonomous flying would be possible, it would be difficult to convince people to actually fly with an autonomous aircraft. A survey of 8.000 people done by UBS found that only 17% of respondents would buy a ticket for a pilotless flight. Nevertheless, I think that this percentage could rise with the commercialization of autonomous transportation for other modes of transport. For many people, autonomous transportation still sounds like something from movies, but if there are more and more autonomous cars on the road, the consensus on autonomous transportation including autonomous flying could drastically change. Even though it seems likely that we will not see any pilotless commercial flights in the next 50 years,  I am wondering what your current thoughts are on getting on a pilotless flight. Do you feel safer on a flight knowing that there are human operators on board or do you think taking out the human error factor makes flying safer?

 


 

[1] – IATA. (2013, March). Strong Passenger Growth Trend Continues. Opgehaald van IATA: http://www.iata.org/pressroom/pr/Pages/2013-07-03-01.aspx

[2] – Kottasová, I. (2017, August). Pilotless planes could save airlines billions. But would anyone fly? Opgehaald van CNN: http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/07/technology/business/pilotless-planes-passengers/index.html

[3] – Lerner, P. (2017, August). Would You Fly on an Airliner Without a Pilot? Opgehaald van Air & Space Magazine: http://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/02_aug2017-airplanes-without-pilots-180963931/

[4] – Scott, A. (2017, June). Boeing wants to build a futuristic plane that can fly without a pilot. Opgehaald van Business Insider: http://www.businessinsider.com/r-boeing-studies-pilotless-planes-as-it-ponders-next-jetliner-2017-6?international=true&r=US&IR=T

 

Please rate this

Why self-driving cars must be designed to kill

9

October

2016

5/5 (1) Would you buy a car that sacrifices the driver on occasion, or a car that preserves the driver on all occasions?

Researchers in a recent study published in Science (2016) “The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles” asked exactly that, and the results were quite interesting, raising implications for the programming of self-driving vehicles and governmental regulation.

Driverless vehicles may hold the promise of saving millions of lives around the world. In 2015 in the US alone, 38,300 people were killed and around 4.4 million people sustained injuries due to vehicle related accidents. Most of the accidents happen because of human error and by replacing the human with a highly calculated robot, which does not get drunk or distracted and drives within speed limits, automated vehicles could prevent a large number (according to research, up to 90%) of accidents.

A major question arises in the rare occasion of a no-win scenario that a fatal accident can’t be avoided by the autonomous vehicle. For example, you’re riding along in your car, when suddenly a group of pedestrians appear in the way and the car must decide in a split-second whether to drive over the pedestrians or sacrifice the driver by swerving off the road towards a concrete block.

In the study with 2000 respondents, 76% thought that autonomous vehicles should be programmed to be utilitarian, meaning they should be programmed to save the most lives while sacrificing as few lives possible. In the case of the accident, the majority believed it to be moral to sacrifice the driver rather than a group of pedestrians.

However, when asked if they themselves would buy a car that is programmed to be utilitarian, a large majority of the respondents said they wouldn’t buy one and instead prefer to ride in autonomous vehicles that protect the driver and passengers at all costs. This is the dilemma: most people would like others to drive cars that minimize casualties, but everybody wants their own car to protect them at all costs.

Figuring out how to build ethical autonomous vehicles is one of the most difficult challenges in artificial intelligence today for car-manufacturers and governments. Governmental regulation could insist that all cars be programmed to save as many lives as possible, but then people would not be eager to adopt them. Therefore programming the cars to make the “right” moral decision may be one of the biggest impediments to autonomous vehicle adoption. But if manufacturers and buyers are given the choice of self-preservation above everything else, are they liable for the harmful consequences of the programmed decisions? For the time being, there is no clear-cut answer on how the cars should be designed in a no-win scenario like this, but we as a society need to address if we want to hand the responsibility of driving over to a computer.

Try out the http://moralmachine.mit.edu/ to test your responses compared to others on moral decisions made by self-driving cars.

What do you think? Write your opinions in comment section below.

Sources:

Bonnefon, Jean-François, Azim Shariff, and Iyad Rahwan. “The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles.” Science 352.6293 (2016): 1573-1576.

http://europe.newsweek.com/2015-brought-biggest-us-traffic-death-increase-50-years-427759?rm=eu

Please rate this

Forget Self-Driving Cars: Amsterdam Is Getting Autonomous Boats!

25

September

2016

5/5 (2) While the first prototypes of self-driving cars are taking the roads, Amsterdam will get the first autonomous boats on its canals next year. “Roboats” will completely change the city’s infrastructure.

Researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (AMS Institute), Delft University of Technology (TUD), and Wageningen University and Research (WUR) announced the first major research project on autonomous vessels in metropolitan areas. The project will take five years and has a grand budget of 25 million euros.

Roboats is the first large-scale research on exploring and testing the rich set of possibilities for autonomous systems on water. The scope of the project is not just autonomous boats for the transport of goods and people. The researchers are also looking into dynamic and temporary floating infrastructure like on-demand bridges and stages that allow assembly and disassembly in just a couple of hours.

roboat 1

“Roboat offers enormous possibilities,” says Professor Arjan van Timmeren, AMS Institute’s Scientific Director, “as we’ll also be exploring environmental sensing. We could for instance do further research on underwater robots that can detect diseases at an early stage or use Roboats to rid the canals from floating waste and find a more efficient way to handle the 12,000 bicycles that end up in the city’s canals each year.” These underwater Roboats will also gather data on environmental aspects like water quality, air quality, and noise to keep track of these features of an urban area over time.

This means Roboats are not just a form of transport. They are platforms that should be able to join together to form temporary bridges or extend the shore at times of peak demand. Think of the opportunities during rush hour or during a festival. I can tell from my own experience that more efficient transportation and infrastructure like mentioned above are very much needed during those times.

roboat 2

So, why do we need Roboats? The project aims to improve transportation, mobility and water quality in metropolitan areas. With 60% of the world population living around coasts, riverbanks and deltas, researchers expect the Roboat project to become an example for urban areas around the world. In addition, it could be a source of international entrepreneurial initiatives and start-ups researching autonomy in the marine world. Finally, Roboats can give insights for assessment and predictions on ecological quality.

The first Roboat prototypes are expected to be floating on the canals of Amsterdam in 2017. What do you think about this new research? Do you think it will be valuable for metropolitan areas all around the world, and in the future?

 

 

Sources:

http://www.ams-institute.org/roboat/

http://fortune.com/2016/09/19/amsterdam-roboat-autonomous/

http://www.itnews.com/article/3121748/emerging-technology/autonomous-boats-yes-boats-to-hit-the-water-in-2017.html

Please rate this

Self-driving Ubers hit the road!

18

September

2016

5/5 (1) This week, Uber launched its most promising project: Self-driving taxi’s!

Don’t get too excited. The first handful of self-driving Ubers is currently only available to the lucky residents of downtown Pittsburgh. In this pilot-stage of the project, the cars come with an engineer on the driver’s seat and a co-pilot to take down observations. Passengers taking this experimental taxi get their ride for free, instead of paying $1,05 per mile.

Uber co-founder and CEO Travis Kalanick mentions that in the long run, prices will fall so low that the per-mile cost of travel, even for long trips in rural areas, will be lower in a driverless Uber than in a private car.

And that is where things become interesting!

Imagine every time you need a ride, you push a button on your mobile phone and an autonomous car appears. Who needs a car, when a driverless Uber is more affordable than owning a private car? Technology poses the question of whether it’s necessary to own an automobile. Already, “millennials” appear to value car ownership less than previous generations do.

“That could be seen as a threat,” says Volvo Cars CEO Hakan Samuelsson. “We see it as an opportunity.” Earlier this year, Uber and Volvo signed a $300 million pact to develop a fully autonomous car that will be ready for the road by 2021. But the Volvo deal isn’t exclusive. Besides, Uber plans to install self-driving kits into existing vehicles. With its a plan to build an autonomous vehicle empire, Uber aims to replace more than 1 million human drivers with self-driving cars as soon as possible.

With the rise of autonomous vehicles and car sharing services, McKinsey recently predicted that by 2050 we can do with 75% less cars!

Has Uber, disruptor of the taxi-industry, given the start signal for the disruption of the car industry?

 

 

 

Sources:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2016-08-18/uber-s-first-self-driving-fleet-arrives-in-pittsburgh-this-month-is06r7on?utm_content=business
https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2015/08/21/stap-jij-straks-in-een-zelfrijdende-uber-tesla-taxi-niet-zo-snel-a1495264

Uber Launching Its Self-Driving Cars This Month


http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/a-road-map-to-the-future-for-the-auto-industry
http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/ten-ways-autonomous-driving-could-redefine-the-automotive-world

Please rate this