The Creative Cost of Convenience

9

October

2025

No ratings yet.

While it’s now part of an exercise to write blog posts in which we reflect on our experience with AI tools, this topic has been on my mind for quite some time. I often find myself wondering: who am I without the assistance of these AI things? What is my added value?

Most interesting is that it hasn’t been long since the first consumer-facing AI tools entered our lives, and yet I increasingly hear from people, both within and beyond the university environment, that they can hardly remember what life was like before these tools existed. That’s wild, especially considering how quickly we’ve become reliant on them.

And I’m no exception. Although I was a late adopter of the technology, I now use AI regularly, across a wide range of tasks. In academic settings, I mostly use Copilot and ChatGPT for refining my ideas, generating feedback on my work, and correcting my writing, especially since English isn’t my first language. Outside of the university environment, I recently started to experiment with image and video generation tools, as they allow me to express my creativity in a completely new and faster way. In those moments, AI feels like a complementary creative partner, and using it that way is genuinely fun and empowering.

However, I also notice a growing trend: more and more people are outsourcing entire workflows to AI, from brainstorming all the way to final drafts. And honestly, I can’t blame them. The efficiency gains from automating repetitive tasks are undeniable. But as others have pointed out in their blogs as well, this shift comes at a cost. I really feel like we’re gradually offloading our human capabilities, our creativity, our critical thinking, to machines. If we continue down this path, those skills may slowly fade away.

And I feel like it’s already affecting most of us, at least I know it has affected me. It changes how we think. A part of our problem-solving ability simply gets outsourced, and we don’t always notice it happening. That’s why I’ve started to pull back a bit in how I use generative AI tools. I’m worried that if I rely too much on these tools for my day-to-day tasks, my own creative and critical thinking skills might fade. And if that happens, what do I really bring to the table in future workplaces? If I depend on machines for everything, how can others depend on me?

That’s why, currently, I am working to restore my balance between thinking on my own and seeking ‘advice’ from these tools. And I believe we all should. AI can really be a great support, but it shouldn’t take over the parts that make us human. It should solely complement us, for instance to actually BE creative. The real challenge is to keep thinking for ourselves, stay curious and critical, and make sure we’re still using our own minds, even if it is so tempting to outsource our whole existence to these machines.

What do you think, is AI a step toward empowerment in the human environment, or could it become our downfall?

Please rate this

Generative AI in Schools: A Double-Edged Sword for Student Development

21

October

2023

No ratings yet.

Last week at work I was speaking with one of my colleagues whose son attends the same high school I used to attend. We were discussing his son’s experiences at school and comparing them to when I attended this same school from 2010 to 2012. One big difference that came up was the use of generative AI, especially ChatGPT.

I personally see great benefit in how generative AI such as ChatGPT can enhance our knowledge and our learning experience, but I view this from the point of a university student in his 20’s who had to go through his entire secondary education without the benefit of such tools. My colleague told me that his son has used ChatGPT for almost all his homework assignments and even to write book reports and essays and this is something that worried both him and I.

Your years spent in high school are when you develop yourself and your brain most. By becoming too reliant on AI this can diminish children’s critical thinking and problem-solving abilities that are crucial in their personal development. Also, I think the over-usage of generative AI in school will promote laziness and this can cause negative long-term affects when the person reaches higher education or begins professional life. I personally do not think the current education system, at least in the Netherlands is equipped to be able to handle the current digital landscape. Schools and teachers must find a way to incorporate AI technology into classroom learning in a way that supports critical thinking, problem-solving ability, and independent learning.


According to a recent survey in Australia 43% of over 1000 polled students admitted to using ChatGPT to complete assignments or cheat on exams (Technology News Australia, 2023). According to this same report Australian schools are now considering banning the use of ChatGPT. Public schools in 5 Australian states have already put forth measures to ban its use (Technology News Australia, 2023). Will this become a global trend?

I personally think that the years a child spends in high school are of upmost importance to their development and that changes in our education system need to happen soon. I do not believe in banning the use of Generative AI as it is a tool that can be of great benefit however, a way must be found to limit the negative effects of AI on teenagers. Australia is already implementing measures, are The Netherlands and other nations next?

References:

Technology News Australia. (2023). ChatGPT May Lead To The Downfall Of Education And Critical Thinking. Tech Business News. https://www.techbusinessnews.com.au/blog/chatgpt-may-lead-to-the-downfall-of-eduction-and-critical-thinking/

Please rate this