The Streaming Wars: when streaming services become a more expensive cable

20

September

2019

Netflix is more than just an online digital platform; it has become a cultural phenomenon. Three years ago, Netflix became this one channel to watch virtually anything: from Jurassic Park to Breaking Bad to Toy Story. Many people take their first-month-free subscription because they don’t want to miss out on the latest season of Stranger Things, and never left since. It introduced a trend of binge-watching shows, finishing hours of series in one go until the screen blacks out and asks “Are you still watching?” Television became a device that streams Netflix instead of being its own thing. It lost its meaning so much that many people become cord-cutters – ditching their expensive cable TV subscriptions for a mere $9.99 per month Netflix accounts. It seems that the development of internet goods has yet again made life much cheaper and simpler.

 

Or so we think.

 

Direct-to-consumer distribution model

As Netflix’s popularity and valuation grow, linear (traditional) TV suffer. It is not long when media companies such as WarnerMedia, NBC Universal, and Disney start to launch their own streaming platforms, too. These networks apply a direct-to-consumer distribution model (Sherman & Evans, 2019); instead of selling the licensing rights of their shows to Netflix, they use their brands to make their own platform. These so-called streaming wars prompt TV networks to spend millions of dollars to buy the rights to their most popular shows – such as The Office, Friends, and every Disney movie – back from Netflix to be streamed in their own online platforms NBC’s streamer, HBO Max, and Disney+, respectively (Steinberg, 2019).

Just like most industries, giant tech companies also plans to infiltrate the entertainment industry. Following Netflix’s path of bringing more on-demand consumer base by introducing original content, Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV+ are also in the game with their exclusive contents. For streaming services, the ability to deliver quality content for their platforms is crucial. Take Disney+ as an example: people most probably already have the physical form of their movies, so they need to add value to this new channel (Horner, 2019).

 

Pricing plans

Netflix’s current monthly subscription fee of $9-16 is one of the highest among competitors, Amazon Prime Video ($13), and Hulu ($6-12). However, newcomers’ subscription prices are way lower; with Disney+’s $7 per month and Apple TV+’s mere $5 per month, these prices will definitely damage Netflix’s subscriber count. Other platforms also continue to respond by cutting their subscription prices, like NBCU’s free for cable or satellite subscribers ($12 for non-subscribers). Rao et al. (2000) mentioned that cutting prices may not always be a good retaliation move on their parts as it reduces the overall pie of the market. The other route that each player can take to win is to maximise their platform’s value. Disney, with its extensive collection of movies and series, definitely has the upper hand on this matter. Everything Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars, National Geographic, 21st Century Fox will be on its platform, which will launch in November this year. Not only that, Disney+ also has a subscription bundling plan with other streaming platforms Hulu and ESPN+; both of which are owned by Disney Corporation as well.

Streaming platforms are, in general, a great innovation because it decouples watching TV and watching advertisements (Texeira & Jamieson, 2014). Nonetheless, it seems that the losing party in this war are the consumers. Taking all the pricing plans mentioned above (plus HBO Max’s rumoured subscription price of $16-20 per month), subscribing to all of these platforms would cost – if not more – the same as cable TV subscriptions. The only difference is that giant tech companies have now also entered the battlefield.

Although we have more choice in what to purchase, more options often mean that we might (reluctantly) spend more money than we should have. “Unbundling” Netflix would only create a fragmented market, which will generally increase prices for content (Steinberg, 2019), and induces the need to – yet again – have a platform that bundles everything together again. So, how many loops will it take before the system breaks?

 

References

Horner, A. (2019, July 3). Streaming wars: Why Disney and Apple rivalling Netflix is good news for fans of great TV. Retrieved September 17, 2019, from Independent: https://www.independent.co.uk/

Rao, A., Bergen, M., & Davis, S. (2000). How to Fight a Price War. Harvard Business Review, pp. 107-116.

Sherman, A., & Evans, D. (2019, August 10). How the streaming wars between Disney, Netflix, Apple and everybody else will change TV forever. Retrieved September 17, 2019, from CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/

Steinberg, B. (2019, July 18). Why Consumers Are Already Losing in the Streaming Wars. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from Variety: https://variety.com/

Teixeira, T., & Jamieson, P. (2014, October 28). Disruption Starts with Unhappy Customers, Not Technology. Harvard Business Review.

5/5 (1)

Please rate this

Disney’s Billion Dollar Investment In The Internet Of Things – Was it Worth It?

11

October

2016

5/5 (9)

Disney’s parks in the US are incredibly popular. Due to this popularity mainly at peak vacation dates, waiting times to enter the park or go into certain rides can be excessive. In 2008 Meg Crofton, president of Walt Disney World requested research be done into ways to help relieve these ‘customer pain points’.

The development team came up with RFID wristbands called MyMagic+. Visitors to Disney World would be able to buy wristbands with RFID chips that had several functions within the park. It would function as a hotel key, automatic payment system, and even allow visitors to make reservations at certain rides so that they could enter them immediately at their designated time and did not have to wait in line. The investment for this project was significant, a $1 billion budget was drawn out to create and launch MyMagic+. The question is, was this large investment worth it?

According to Disney’s financial report of 2015 they are currently still losing money to MyMagic+. However the investment is still relatively new, so this is not out of the ordinary. Customers are very positive about the MyMagic+ experience, and waiting times have been cut significantly. Waiting times at the entrance of the park have been cut by up to 35%. More than 18 million guests have now used the MyMagic+ wristbands.

However the problem with technology now a days is that it becomes obsolete very quickly. RFID technology is now compatible with most modern day smartphones. When asked if MyMagic+ would be expanded outside of Walt Disney World, Disney executives answered that it would, but most likely in different ways. They acknowledge that smartphones are most likely the way to go. In the new $5.5 billion dollar park in Shanghai, that just opened this spring, Disney will not be introducing the wristbands. Instead the park will make use of a mobile application and smartphones. Disney will also not be introducing the wristbands in its other two parks in California.

MyMagic+ was an interesting approach to applying the internet of things to an entertainment park. Whereas it does make the park more efficient and result in more customer satisfaction, it may have been the wrong way to go about using this technology. If Disney had made use of smart phones from the beginning onwards, investment costs would most likely not have been as high. MyMagic+ might have been a cheaper project and might have had better business results. In the end it is still a very interesting case related to the internet of things to look at, and many companies, including Disney itself, can learn from the project.

Sources:
Disney’s Annual Report 2015 – https://ditm-twdc-us.storage.googleapis.com/2015-Annual-Report.pdf
Bloomberg Report MyMagic+ – http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-03-07/disney-bets-1-billion-on-technology-to-track-theme-park-visitors
Themepark Report MyMagic+ – http://www.themeparktourist.com/news/20141107/29594/5-important-facts-tucked-away-disney-s-quarterly-and-yearly-earnings-report
Steven Van Belleghem About MyMagic+ – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtQKVEk1aig
Orlando Sentinel on MyMagic+ – http://www.orlandosentinel.com/travel/attractions/the-daily-disney/os-disney-magicbands-phones-20160408-story.html
Shanghai and MyMagic+ – http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-10/why-disney-won-t-be-taking-magic-wristbands-to-its-chinese-park

Please rate this