No Cash, No Card, No Phone, Just Your Face – The New Age of Payment Technology

27

September

2017

5/5 (1)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLAtO7RgVM4

Just a few years ago bank card scanners were introduced, eliminating the pin-code function. Just a year ago phone scanning payment systems were introduced. Just a few months ago companies introduced face-scan payments. Although facial recognition is nothing new, its accuracy has only just become sufficient to secure financial transactions. The advancement of payment systems has been exponential over the past years, and is expected to only intensify in the future.

Chinese companies are currently using face-detecting systems to synchronize many daily tasks. These systems can be used to authorize payments, access facilities and even track down criminals, being described as beneficial for both surveillance and convenience.

Face payment systems are something so advanced for the most of us that I will take a minute to explain how it works. Chinese start-up Face ++ has already begun realizing this new payment opportunity. Through scanning one’s face, one gets placed in a database. The database allows over 83 points of one’s face to be tracked and analyzed simultaneously. In tracking this “unique” points on one’s face, the system can recognize a client in the database and access their accounts to authorize payments, access facilities and even track down criminals. (Knight, 2017) In order to avoid people tricking the technology they have also implemented a “liveness” algorithm to ensure that people are not using a photo or video of someone else. (Wang, 2017) The entire system works through users uploading their “live” faces into the database, integrating facial biometric data and tracking the 83 mentioned points from various angles. (Stray, 2017)

Face ++ technology’s popularity has been growing rapidly, with approximately 120 million people in China making use of the Face++ app to confirm their payments. (Stray, 2017) The company has already partnered with commercial banks such as Ant Financial and has already been incorporated into various apps in China, such as Alipay, in order to complete payments. (Knight, 2017) The popularity of face-payment systems has even spread to restaurant chains in China. Chinese high-tech versions of KFC, known as KPro, installed face-scanners earlier this month, being the first physical store in the world to use facial recognition software for processing payments (Wang, 2017). Deep learning and artificial intelligence techniques are employed for image recognition in order to increase identification reliability. (Knight, 2017)

The initial benefit of such facial recognition payments was to increase customer convenience, thereby enhancing customer experience. As these payments have become more abundant, their benefits have become more noticeable. Facial-recognition payments are believed to ease the customer experience as customers will no longer have to carry wallets or phones with them. Furthermore, the experience is believed to be more “personalized” as the payment systems can recognize who a customer is, how often they have been somewhere, and their ordering preferences. Facial-recognition payment software is being found to be beneficial not only for payments and convenience, but also for surveillance. Local governments in China are currently using the Face ++ technology to identify criminals from surveillance cameras. (Stray, 2017)

However, the risks associated with facial-recognition payments are the reason why these payments have not yet achieved success in Western countries. The main risk, which you may have already guessed, is the privacy issues at hand. Implementation of such a system which is reliant on a large database may be difficult in countries outside of China. China already has a large database of ID card photos of its inhabitants, which lowers the intensity of possible privacy issues, as inhabitants already have their information stored in a large, government controlled database. One’s personal data: finances, whereabouts, habits, frequently visited locations, etc. are all stored in a database. If this database were to be accessed by someone outside of the allocated authorities, then there could be a tremendous problem. Furthermore, everywhere one goes, their personal data shows up, how safe is this? People are often hesitant in sharing data, especially regarding financial data. In storing all of this data in one large database, there is a high risk of this ending up public.

Furthermore, it is believed that the integration of facial-recognition software into our daily activities will greatly transform everything from policing to the way people act everyday. (Knight, 2017) In making our day-to-day interactions more mechanical, will we soon lose normal social skills that we use when going to the grocery store, or the bank? It has been proven that people receive endorphins from social contact (Krach, 2010), where will we now receive these endorphins from? Will people turn into worlds of isolation?

Furthermore, if people become used to walking around without wallets, what will they do when faced with other situations in countries where privacy regulations are such that these payments are not possible, or not feasible?  In India they are still struggling with mobile wallets, it will take decades before they are able to implement such a facial-recognition system. How will people go about having a “back-up” for when travelling to less advanced countries if they have gotten rid of all of their wallets?

Although facial-recognition is not a new concept, and facial-recognition payments sound convenient, there are many aspects which must be considered before implementing this system across more countries, especially across countries with more privacy limitations.

“We hope one day in the future people can go out without their cell phones or wallets” – Dong Liyun (Wang, 2017). What do you think, will this technology soon be implemented in Europe? How do you think the EU will deal with the aforementioned privacy issues? How do you think facial-recognition will change society?

References

Knight, W. (2017). In China, you can pay for goods just by showing your face. [online] MIT Technology Review. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603494/10-breakthrough-technologies-2017-paying-with-your-face/ [Accessed 27 Sep. 2017].

Krach, S. (2010). The rewarding nature of social interactions. [online] Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2889690/ [Accessed 27 Sep. 2017].

Stray, K. (2017). Paying With Your Face++. [online] Coin Telegraph. Available at: https://cointelegraph.com/news/paying-with-your-face [Accessed 27 Sep. 2017].

Wang, J. (2017). Pay with your face at this KFC restaurant in China. [online] CNNMoney. Available at: http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/01/technology/china-alipay-kfc-facial-recognition/index.html [Accessed 27 Sep. 2017].

 

Please rate this

The Future of Fintech – Collaboration or Cannibalization?

29

September

2016

4.92/5 (12)
Fintech Investment Financial Internet Technology Concept
Source: Fintech Investment Financial Internet Technology Concept

 

According to M. Porter: “the “new economy” appears less like a new economy than like an old economy that has access to a new technology” (Porter, 2001). While this statement may be true for some industries, it is not entirely valid for the banking sector which got completely transformed through IT advancements during the last 30 years.

Before the advent of digital computers and the rise of the Internet, employees in financial firms had to keep record of all transactions on paper. Job hunting and advertising efforts were being conducted through newspapers. Nowadays every single bank department is transformed – through the introduction of various software programs, the Internet and IT enhancements in general (both software- and hardware-wise). Consequentially, new processes, jobs, and business models are continuously emerging.

Fintech

IT has helped financial institutions offer higher quality services and convenience, creating a potential for collaboration and mutual profit. There is a buzzword to describe the phenomenon – fintech.

But what gives fintech companies an advantage over traditional market players? The trick is that IT companies can engage in the banking business without having to go through strict regulations and complex processes. Exactly this window of opportunity threatens the old-fashioned and traditionalistic banks and favours technology firms.

So what new business models will emerge from the recent technology disruption? There are two major scenarios: banks will get stronger and improve their reputation through collaboration with tech companies or technology companies will get greedy and eventually start eating up bank’s market share.

Scenario 1: Collaboration

The sweet spot called fintech offers new opportunities for collaboration between fin and tech companies as the fin part (financial sector) is highly regulated while the tech part (technology sector) is not. Currently, tech firms are mainly concentrating on providing complementary products and services that do not require banking license. In the future, as they exhaust growth opportunities, tech companies might lose interest in entering the complex areas (products and services) of the banking sector, which require proper infrastructure, processes, and sufficient capital. On the other hand, banks enjoy a good reputation in the financial world and possess a valuable know-how. Thus, a future collaboration between financial and technology companies seems like a profitable opportunity for both sides.

Start-up Programs

Banks have shown great interest in start-ups by attending entrepreneurship- focused events or even sponsoring fintech start-ups. Examples are Fintech Innovation Lab, Startupbootcamp and other. Some banks take part in programs that allow them to benefit from IT developments by getting involved in various types of agreements.

Partnerships

Banks are also interested in partnerships with established IT companies. Such partnerships allow financial firms to buy services and/or products and implement them under their own brands. Additionally, by participating in business networks, banks and IT organisations can provide complementary products and services that better meet consumers’ needs. Examples are online and mobile banking platforms which are often not developed by banks themselves.

Scenario 2: Cannibalization

Cannibalization is the perfect term to describe the other option for fintech’s future. The term refers to the process of one kind eating species of its own kind. Since technology companies have started offering financial services and products, they have been eating up the profits of banks.

Banks – too big to fail?

A comparison of the Fortune 500 firms from 1995 and 2015 shows that only 12% of the largest corporations still exist (Perry, 2015). This means that the largest banks of today might not exist in 10 or 20 years. On the other hand, tech companies have been very successful in offering better financial solutions that are time-saving, convenient and correspond to the latest customer preferences shifts. The tech giants have sufficient capital, human resources and the advantage of technology know-how so one could argue that they have the capacity to replace the traditional banks.

Financial products and services offered by tech companies

Customers no longer need debit/credit cards to make payments and execute financial transactions. Mobile payments have become easier with the recent hardware and software advancements. Companies such as Alibaba (its affiliated company Ant Financial Services Group), Google Wallet, Paypal, etc. offer mobile payment services, without keeping customers money under custody (in their own premises). Ant Financial Services Group sells insurance products online and provides small loans to business owners that use Alibaba’s retails website. As tech companies continue to offer convenient financial solutions, banks might abandon less profitable products and services, and focus on highly complex solutions.

Conclusion

In order to keep their market shares and for some – to survive, banks need to consider new business models that involve collaboration with IT companies. The future of banks depends on their adaptability as well as on their willingness and success in embracing new technologies. On the other hand, technology companies should as well evaluate the pros and cons of entering new areas of the financial industry.

In the long term, I expect the financial industry to go through continuous transformations in terms of hardware and software. My personal predictions are that robots will replace bank tellers, programs will completely replace financial advisors and mobile payments will make money obsolete.

What do you think – what does the future of fintech hold?

If you are interested in additional fintech analysis and prognosis, you can find more information on Deloitte’s Banking Industry Outlook.

 

References:

“Banking Industry Outlook | Deloitte US | Center For Financial Services”. Deloitte United States. N.p., 2016. Web. 29 Sept. 2016.

“Fintech”. Investopedia. N.p., 2015. Web. 29 Sept. 2016.

“Fintech’S Golden Age: Competition To Collaboration – Accenture”. Accenture.com. N.p., 2016. Web. 29 Sept. 2016.

“Future Of Fintech And Banking – Accenture”. Accenture.com. N.p., 2016. Web. 29 Sept. 2016.

Group, Ant. “Ant Financial Services Group: Private Company Information – Businessweek”. Bloomberg.com. N.p., 2016. Web. 29 Sept. 2016.

Perry, Mark and Mark Perry. “Fortune 500 Firms In 1955 V. 2015; Only 12% Remain, Thanks To The Creative Destruction That Fuels Economic Prosperity – AEI”. AEI. N.p., 2015. Web. 29 Sept. 2016.

Porter, Michael E. “Strategy And The Internet”. Harvard Business Review March 2001 (2001): n. pag. Print.

“The Challenges And Pathways For “Fintech” Companies To Break The Traditional Financial Model”. Centrodeinnovacionbbva.com. N.p., 2016. Web. 29 Sept. 2016.

“Traditional Banks And Fintech Firms: New Collaboration Models”. ICAR. N.p., 2016. Web. 29 Sept. 2016.

Please rate this