How job hunting and recruitment has changed

23

October

2016

No ratings yet.

The internet has changed the job hunting and recruitment process drastically. Now job seekers are applying for jobs  and connecting with employers over Social Media. If you haven’t been paying attention to social media, in particularly to LinkedIn, you have some catching up to do. You cannot afford to ignore LinkedIn today.

LinkedIn

LinkedIn has become an increasingly popular way to network with people in the same industry. More and more employers are using LinkedIn as a recruitment and hiring tool  and students and professionals are using it in their job searches. Treat it like more than a resume. Sure, they both convey your current and former professional roles. But your resume is a formal document used for the specific purpose of gaining the attention of a hiring authority and motivating them to call you to initiate an interview process. Your LinkedIn profile is social. It is for networking and interacting with a wide variety of people, not just hiring authorities. Consequently, it is an important part of the job hunt aside from a formal job request. It allows you to demonstrate what you really care about as a professional, and it can help you build relationships with people who are in a position to positively impact your job hunt.

Also the traditional way of a job interview has changed. Besides face-to-face interviews there are now also mobile interviews and video interviews.

Mobile interview

More than 70% of active job seekers use their mobile phones to look for jobs. Unfortunately, companies are struggling to keep up despite the enormous opportunity mobile provides: just 20% of companies have mobile-optimized career sites, and a mere three percent have a mobile app. It order to keep up with the changes companies need to use IT.

Video interview

A video interview uses online video technology to allow job seekers and hiring professionals to connect earlier in the hiring process. Video interviews take place remotely and use video technology as the communication medium. Since so much communication occurs at the nonverbal level, seeing and being seen is extremely important. And video interviews give people a better way to present themselves, both verbally and nonverbally. There are different kinds of video interviews: Live video interviews (synchronous) and one-way video interviews (asynchronous). Synchronous interviews are conducted live over the Internet. In contrast, an asynchronous video interview is pre-recorded by the job seeker and submitted to the employer.

Please rate this

Is it really good to have too many options?

3

October

2012

No ratings yet.

Hello Everyone 🙂

In LinkedIn case, it is said that LinkedIn opened its APIs to outsider developers in 2007, but unlike Facebook, they control the quality of all the apps that is going to be launched, if not approved by LinkedIn, developers cannot launch their widgets or apps. Thus the huge gap between number of apps in Facebook and LinkedIn.

I am going to introduce you a theory by Barry Schwartz –http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Schwartz_(psychologist).

It is called the “paradox of choice”. But rather than explaining the theory and bore all of you with my long post, I think its better to watch him to explain what his theory is all about.

I really recommend you to watch this video in full, because its really interesting and funny too. You can also apply his theory in any subject, even in your life.

My understanding of Schwartz theory is that having too many choices makes us miserable, takes too much time come to a conclusion, eventually when we made our minds we regret it, and think that we are not good decision makers.

So how this theory is related to LinkedIn case issue I stated above?

I don’t know if you remember Steve Jobs was showing off about how many apps they had in the app store – the current number is around 700k. When Android introduced itself they criticize that many apps in Apple App store pretty much useless, and that what makes Android Store great is that every application has a purpose and is useful.

So is it really  terrible for LinkedIn to have a strict control over the apps and widgets, and having few apps and widgets compared to Facebook?

I believe the answer is no. Mainly because rather than being frustrated about the useless apps and their pop-up message bombs everyday in Facebook, I believe most people would chose to have less but sophisticated and working apps and widgets. Especially in LinkedIn, where people gather not for fun but for academic and/or work-related issues, subjects, and professional networking.

Hopefully you’ll enjoy my first entry.

 

Please rate this