Platformization at Different Speeds: Why Some Industries Lag Behind

8

October

2025

5/5 (1)

What do some of the best-known tech companies have in common? Surely, they all are incredibly successful. But they all are also platform-based organizations that through the agility with which they are able to innovate and scale, have redefined entire industries by creating ecosystems and connecting users, data, and services in ways traditional firms could never match (Blumberg et al., 2020). Over the past decade, platform business models have revolutionized entire industries. Airbnb reshaped hospitality without owning a single hotel. Uber transformed urban transport without a fleet of cars. Spotify turned music into a service rather than a product. Yet, while these consumer-facing industries have been transformed almost overnight, others — like procurement, manufacturing, or healthcare — have been far slower to “platformize.”

The difference lies in how easily digital platforms can generate network effects. Platforms thrive when they connect fragmented markets, reduce transaction costs, and create standardized interactions between users (Madanaguli et al., 2023). If you think of a ride, a song, or a stay, transactions here are relatively simple. In sectors such as hospitality or entertainment, data is abundant, trust can be built through ratings, and users switch platforms easily.

In contrast, industries like B2B procurement involve complex relationships built on trust, quality assurance, and long-term contracts (Beard, 2025). Transactions are high-value, and negotiations are delicate and require time. As a result, even if the benefits of digital matching are clear – transparency, efficiency, and data insights – adoption takes time. Even emerging B2B platforms such as Torg or Wonnda, which connect food and beverage buyers with suppliers, must first overcome structural and cultural barriers before achieving the same level of network-driven momentum as Uber or Airbnb. Still, things are changing. Advances in AI and automation are reducing friction in traditionally “offline” sectors. As information flows become more standardized, we can expect a new wave of platforms to emerge — this time not for your next ride or vacation, but for sourcing ingredients, manufacturing components, or managing supply chains.

The question is no longer if platforms will disrupt every industry, but how fast and who will lead the change.

References

Beard, N. V. (2025, September 8). Optimising B2B procurement for the future (2025). BigCommerce. https://www.bigcommerce.co.uk/articles/b2b-ecommerce/b2b-procurement/

Blumberg, S., Kürtz, K., Bossert, O., & Richter, G. (2020, March 12). The power of platforms to reshape the business. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved October 5, 2025, from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/tech-forward/the-power-of-platforms-to-reshape-the-business

Madanaguli, A., Parida, V., Sjödin, D., & Oghazi, P. (2023). Literature review on industrial digital platforms: A business model perspective and suggestions for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122606

Soares, I., & Nieto-Mengotti, M. (2024). Network effects on platform markets. Revisiting the theoretical literature. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 71(4), 605–623. https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2024-0029

Please rate this

The Real Cost of Convenience: Are We Trading Ownership for Access?

27

September

2025

5/5 (1)

Digital disruption is often illustrated to us through the dramatic stories of startups taking on the giants. But a quieter but more profound change is happening: the shift from owning products to subscribing to services. This change, driven by digital platforms, is redefining business models by applying the economics of digital goods to physical products.

Platforms are driving this change by exploiting the characteristics of information goods which have high upfront costs but low reproduction costs. As researchers highlight, digitalization allows manufacturers to switch from selling products to offer data-driven services (Kowalkowski et al., 2022). We can see this in the automotive industry where companies such as BMW are now offering monthly subscriptions to unlock features like heated seats and automatic high-beam headlights (Levin, 2023). In doing so, the car becomes a platform that generates revenue beyond the initial sale and not just a product.

This shows a powerful form of digital disruption that changes how value is created and delivered. The move to service-based models allows companies to build continuous relationships with their customers, creating stable revenue streams through what is essentially a rental economy (Kindström & Kowalkowski, 2015). This goes beyond cars to everyday items. For example, Signify (formerly Philips Lighting) offers a Light-as-a-Service (LaaS) model where businesses pay for high-quality illumination and lighting services rather than the products themselves.  This service includes design, installation, maintenance, upgrades and even replacement of lighting systems, with Signify owning and responsible for the equipment’s lifecycle (Signify, n.d.).

In my opinion, this subscription model has both advantages and drawbacks. While it offers lower upfront costs and continuous updates for consumers, it raises important questions about long-term expenses, repair rights, and consumer autonomy. Are we creating a future where we truly own nothing? The sustainability of this model will depend on whether companies prioritize transparent pricing and fair consumer practices over locking users into perpetual payments.

What has been your experience with subscription services for physical products? Have you found the convenience worth the potential trade-offs?


References:

Kindström, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2015). Service-driven business model innovation: Organizing the shift from a product-based to a service-centric business model. In N. Foss & T. Saebi (Eds.), Business model innovation: The organizational dimension. Oxford University Press.

Kowalkowski, C., Tronvoll, B., Sörhammar, D., & Sklyar, A. (2022). Digital servitization: How data-driven services drive transformation.

Levin, T. (2023, October 20). Car companies want to make billions by charging monthly fees for features like heated seats, but buyers won’t pay up. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/car-feature-subscriptions-add-ons-bmw-ford-toyota-gm-2022-2

Signify. (n.d.). Light as a service. Signify. https://www.signify.com/global/signify-services/managed-services/light-as-a-service

Please rate this