Criminals working from home

9

October

2020

No ratings yet.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the time we spent on our screens has increased drastically. Everything became remote and most of our human interaction consisted of our online contact. Instead of being able to speak with our colleagues, most of our face-to-face conversations turned to emails and Zoom calls. People who started a position while working from home may not even be able to recognize their colleagues if their cameras were not on during the virtual meetings. Working from home became the new normal, but is this transition safe? Will the threat to our cybersecurity be greater as we spend more time and share more online?

The need for keeping our data safe online has become increasingly important during the pandemic, as we spend more time interacting online, sharing more information, and working from home. Remote working has had an impact on the average cost of a data breach already, increasing it by $137,000. Employees working on private home networks rather than secure company ones are left more vulnerable. The pandemic has also limited the number of activities we can enjoy outside of our houses and provided us with more spare time. For hackers, this time was not wasted as pandemic related fraud reports, in the US, have cost around $114.4 million by mid-August 2020. Even when it comes to Zoom, our data has not been safe. In April, more than 500,000 users have been victims of a breach and the accounts were sold on the dark web. It is increasingly important for people to be aware of online threats, and for companies to ensure their cybersecurity strategies sufficiently protect our data, both as consumers and employees.

It has become increasingly attractive for cyber-criminals to attack as the value of data increases and we become more vulnerable. Individuals are not the only ones at risk, companies and other institutions have also felt the increase in cyber-crime. The laboratory at the University of California had their system frozen and ended up having to pay 116.4 bitcoins ($1.14m) to the hackers. The system was worth the money to the laboratory, since it had contained research relating to the search for a Covid-19 cure.

As more companies find ways to monetize data, there will be more money and value for cybercriminals to extort. There are many ways to protect ourselves such as checking our emails for phishing, using an anti-virus, using a VPN, strong passwords, two-factor verification, etc. However, even if we take the necessary steps to protect ourselves, we may still become victims. Facebook is constantly involved in data breaches and third-party misusage of users’ information. In 2019, 267 million Facebook user accounts were compromised with phone numbers and names obtained, then offered for sale on the dark web. Do you trust companies with protecting our data? I believe cybercrime will become an increasingly important issue as we transition to hybrid ways of working in the post-pandemic life (hopefully). Are you concerned about cybercrime and the safety of your data?

 

Sources:

https://www.pandasecurity.com/mediacenter/news/covid-cybersecurity-statistics/

https://www.ibm.com/security/data-breach

https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/how-to-think-about-cybersecurity-era-covid-19

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2020/04/20/facebook-users-beware-hackers-just-sold-267-million-of-your-profiles-for-540/

https://www.ft.com/content/935a9004-0aa5-47a2-897a-2fe173116cc9

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/12/20/facebook-personal-details-267-million-users-exposed-online/

Please rate this

Consumer Data: Currency of the Future. 5/5 (1)

10

October

2016

Google Home – the always-listening connected speaker. Welcome to the next generation of consumer data collection. At Alphabet’s hardware launch event last week, the company unveiled it’s answer to Amazon’s Echo: a wireless speaker with a set of microphones built into it, allowing the neat little device to continuously listen to you. A physical “mute” button on top let’s you tell it to stop listening, and actually, that’s the most interesting thing about it – Google Home listens to you by default.

Our personal devices are becoming more personal than we ever could have imagined, and Google Home is a clear testament to that. The company has positioned itself right at the heart of consumer data, with access to unlimited, highly personal information. It’s always listening, always learning. TechCrunch’s Natasha Lomas put it perfectly, “in other words, your daily business is Google’s business.”

Personal spaces like your home and office are being turned into gold mines of consumer data, all fueling Google’s AI technology. That’s the nature of machine learning, it needs information to become useful. In order to give you suggestions on where you might like to eat or what the traffic’s like on your commute to work, it needs to continuously harvest your personal information, preferences etc. and learn, infinitely. It sounds a little paranoid, but that’s the raw truth. When I first heard about Google Home (and the rest of Google’s hardware line), I was pretty excited, to be honest. Besides its good-looks, it seemed Google was in a better position than anyone to pull off an AI-powered home device, which added huge appeal. Having had a bit of a think, however, I’m somewhat nervous about giving them total unobstructed access to the most personal aspects of my life…

AI is becoming an integral part of our lives, the more we find utility in it, and businesses like Google are tapping directly into that in order to profit in a multitude of ways. Google Home offers direct access to our most personal spaces, and it’s difficult to deny that it feels a little invasive – but then that depends on your perspective, I guess. In any case, it seems we may have come to a crossroads; we need to ask ourselves if we’re ready to give up that access and, perhaps more to the point, are we to gain or to lose from doing so?

It seems pretty clear to me: consumer data is the currency of the future, and Google is going to be absolutely swimming in it.


Sources:

  • https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/04/say-hello-to-google-home/
  • https://madeby.google.com/home/
  • https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/05/not-ok-google/
  • http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/technology/google-to-introduce-its-voice-activated-home-device.html?_r=1
  • https://thescene.com/watch/wired/google-is-changing-its-gadget-game?source=player_scene_logo

Please rate this

Smart containers: How do they lead to operational savings?

13

September

2016

No ratings yet.

When in the 1950s, Malcom McLean revolutionized international trade by introducing the intermodal container, most likely no one envisioned the invention becoming “smart” in the future. Once the pioneering  method of transporting goods was commercialized, new versions of the container began to appear. Soon enough the reefer, also known as a refrigerated container, was added to the intermodal container fleet.

Designed to provide a temperature controlled environment for the transport of perishable goods, reefers allow us to ship not only fruit and vegetables but also pharmaceuticals, wine or frozen meat. Try to imagine having 270,000 of such containers at your disposal and the need for thorough physical pre-trip inspections (PTI). As every reefer operates using its own integral refrigeration unit and, at times an additional diesel powered generator, this process can be quite a challenge.

Maersk Line, the world’s largest container shipping company decided to tackle this problem using the data recording process. Remote Container Management (RCM), the system enabling this to happen, is rather simple but extremely effective. Through a modem, GPS, wireless SIM card and a satellite link, the company gives the concept of supply chain visibility a new meaning.

The mentioned components are able to collect data on reefer’s position, its atmospheric conditions and power status, while the satellite transmitter installed on the vessels receives them from the modem. Real-time information are further sent to the satellite, which delivers them back to RCM teams placed around the world.

The vast amount of data provided by the RCM, is used to analyze the running conditions of the reefer equipment. Through the continuous process of live monitoring, time and labour consuming PTIs have been reduced by 50%. The risk of not discovering reefer malfunctions in time is now negligible, meaning that the commodities will remain safe and sound. Through the value of information, Maersk Line is able to maintain their reputation as a top tier shipping company.

In fact, Maersk Line already focuses on a more innovative approach on their road to “operational and commercial excellence”. Their desire for the future is to connect individual sensors on ships to monitor the whole fleet’s operational performance, and ultimately integrate entire supply chains. With the current technology progress, I am certain this is possible within a decade. What is your opinion?

 

Krystian Palczewski 384439

Sources:

https://www.cma-cgm.com/products-services/reefer/containers-fleet

http://www.en.ipu.dk/Indhold/refrigeration-and-energy-technology/cases/2016-04_MaerskRaps.aspx

http://www.maersk.com/en/the-maersk-group/about-us/publications/group-annual-magazine/2015/smart-containers-listen-and-talk

Please rate this